Unequal contributions of male and female gene pools from parental populations in the African descendants of the city of Melo, Uruguay
Abstract
In admixed populations, genetic contributions from males and females of specific parental populations can be of different proportions due to past directional mating during the process of genetic admixture. In this research paper, we provide evidence of such male- and female-specific differential admixture components of African, European, and American Indian origin in an admixed population from the city of Melo, in the northeastern region of Uruguay. From data on 11 autosomal markers from a sample of 41 individuals of mixed African descent, we estimated 47% African, 38% European, and 15% Amerindian contributions. In contrast, 6 mtDNA site-specific polymorphic markers showed that the mtDNA genome of these individuals was 52% African, 19% European, and 29% Amerindian, while from 3 Y-specific polymorphic sites, we estimated 30% African, 64% European, and 6% Amerindian contributions. We argue that this heterogeneity of admixture estimates results from disproportionate unions of European males with African and American Indian females from which this mixed African population was formed. Also, we argue that the asymmetry of the admixture estimates from the three sets of markers (autosomal, mtDNA, and Y-linked) is a result of the changes in the direction of mating during the history of the population. Implications of such evidence of directional mating are discussed, indicating the need of further demographic data for a quantitative assessment of the impact of directional mating on ge…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Consistent with previous studies, Latinos have 13% less European ancestry on the X chromosome than genome-wide, showing proportionally greater European ancestry contributions from males.
“Consistent with previous studies that show a sex bias in admixture in Latino populations,12–18 we estimate 13% less European ancestry on the X chromosome than genome-wide (Table 1), showing proportionally greater European ancestry contributions from males.”
From The genetic ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
Latinos across the Americas have differing proportions of Native American, African, and European genetic ancestry, shaped by local historical interactions with migrants brought by the slave trade, European settlement, and indigenous Native American populations.
“Latinos across the Americas have differing proportions of Native American, African, and European genetic ancestry, shaped by local historical interactions with migrants brought by the slave trade, European settlement, and indigenous Native American populations.12–18”
From The genetic ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
Cites
Estimating African American Admixture Proportions by Use of Population-Specific Alleles
Parra, E. J., Marcini, A., Akey, J., Martinson, J., Batzer, M. A., Cooper, R., Forrester, T., Allison, D. B., Deka, R., Ferrell, R. E., et al. (1998) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302148 · Cited by 771 · see citing works
Reed, T. E. (1969) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.165.3895.762 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The genetic ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States
Bryc, K., Durand, E. Y., Macpherson, J. M., Reich, D., & Mountain, J. L. (2015) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.11.010 · Cited by 712 · see citing works
Admixture analysis of a rural population of the state of Guerrero, Mexico
Bonilla, C., Gutiérrez, G., Parra, E. J., Kline, C., & Shriver, M. D. (2005) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20227 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sans, M., Weimer, T. A., Franco, M. H. L. P., Salzano, F. M., Bentancor, N., Alvarez, I., Bianchi, N. O., & Chakraborty, R.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- Hospital de Clínicas (UY)
- Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Celular (AR)
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sans, Mónica
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-04-05
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-44
- ISSN
- 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-8644
- OpenAlex
- W2045741747
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01gm045861-08)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-41399, GM 45861, GM 58545, R01GM041399, R01GM058545)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
- Keywords
- African admixture, European admixture, mitochondrial DNA, Y chromosome, autosomal markers, population structure
- MeSH terms
- Africa, Demography, DNA, Mitochondrial, Europe, Female, Genetic Markers, Genetics, Population, Humans, Indians, North American, Male, Reproduction, Uruguay, Y Chromosome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review