Cited by 249Primate Behavior and EcologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesMorphological variations and asymmetry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 190 of the 193 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Systematics and body size: implications for feeding adaptations in New World monkeys.

Ford, Susan M., Davis, Lesa C.·1992·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

The relationship between body size and feeding ecology is well established for primates. It is argued that the evolutionary history of modern New World monkeys and, in particular, the path to attainment of current body size is significant in understanding the similarities and differences between dietary strategies and other ecological parameters of similar-sized monkeys. Current interpretations of New World monkey evolutionary relationships are reviewed. Based on a synthesis of available body weights and the assumption that the earliest New World monkeys weighed close to 1 kg, similar to modern Aotus and Callicebus, predicted patterns of body size change in each lineage are given. Restrictions on directions of body size change in primates are discussed, and it is shown that "Stanley's Rule" offers a good explanation for differing body size ranges in New and Old World anthropoids. Predicted ecological correlates to body size drawn from the mammalian literature are offered and tested using data on New World monkeys, which show some concurrence and several interesting departures from predicted patterns. Sexual dimorphism in body weight of New World monkey species is reviewed, based on the new summary of body weight data given.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.1330880403

Cites

190 of 190 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 193 references

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. Ackerman D, 1991, A reporter at large (golden monkeys), The New Yorker June, 24, 36
  2. Aguirre AC, 1971, O mono Brachyteles arachnoides (E. Geoffroy)
  3. Altmann‐Schonberner D, 1965, Beobachtungen uber aufzucht und entwicklung des verhaltens beim grossen lowenaffchen, Leontocebus rosalia, Zool. Gart., 31, 227
  4. Ayres JM, 1981, Cebidae: Primates)
  5. Buchanan DB, 1981, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, 391
  6. Cheverud J, 1985, Phylogenetic autocorrelation and the correlates of sexual dimorphism in primates, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 63, 145
  7. Cicmanec JL, 1978, The Biology and Conservation of the Callitrichidae, 331
  8. Coimbra‐Filho AF, 1969, Mico‐leao, Leontideus rosalia (Linnaeus, 1766), situacao atual da especie no Brasil (Callithricidae ‐ Primates), Ann. Acad. Brasil Cienc., 41, 29
  9. Coimbra‐Filho AF, 1978, Biology and Conservation of the Callitrichidae, 105
  10. Coimbra‐Filho AF, 1981, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates
  11. Crockett CM, 1986, Primate Societies, 54
  12. DavisLC(1987)Morphological evidence of positional behavior in the hindlimb ofCebupithecia sarmientoi(Primates: Platyrrhini). M.A. thesis Arizona State University.
  13. Davis LC, 1988, Morphological evidence of locomotor behavior in a fossil platyrrhine, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 75, 202
  14. De Boer LEM, 1974, Cytotaxonomy of the Platyrrhini, Genen en Phaenen, 17, 1
  15. Dickinson C, 1989, Phylogeny of New World primates assessed by two‐dimensional electrophoresis of erythrocyte proteins, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 78, 214
  16. Eisenberg JF, 1990, Body Size in Mammalian Paleobiology: Estimation and Biological Implications, 25
  17. Fontaine R, 1981, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, 443
  18. Ford SM, 1986, Comparative Primate Biology, 73
  19. Freese C, 1981, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, 331
  20. GarberPA EncarnacionF MoyaL andPruetzJD(in press)Demography dispersal and polyandrous and polygynous mating patterns in an island population of moustached tamarin monkeys (Suguinus mystax). Am. J. Primatol.
  21. Gaulin SJC, 1977, Nutrition and the Brain, 1
  22. Glander KE, 1987, Morphometrics of the genus Alouatta, Int. J. Primatol., 8, 429
  23. Goldizen AW, 1986, Primate Societies, 34
  24. Grand TI, 1990, Body Size in Mammalian Paleobiology: Estimation and Biological Implications, 39
  25. Harvey PH, 1986, Primate Societies, 181
  26. Heltne PG, 1981, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, 169
  27. Hershkovitz P, 1982, Subspecies and geographic distribution of black‐mantle tamarins Saguinus nigricollis Spix (Primates: Callitrichidae), Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 95, 647
  28. Hershkovitz P, 1985, A preliminary taxonomic review of the South American bearded saki monkeys genus Chiropotes (Cebidae, Platyrrhini), with the description of a new subspecies, Fieldiana n.s., 27, 1
  29. Hill WCO, 1960, Primates: Comparative Anatomy and Taxonomy
  30. Hill WCO, 1962, Primates: Comparative Anatomy and Taxonomy
  31. HoageRJ(1978)Biosocial development in the golden lion tamarin Leontopithecus rosalia rosalia (Primates: Callitrichidae). Ph.D. dissertation University of Pittsburgh.
  32. JansonCH(1975)Ecology and population densities of primates in a Peruvian rainforest. Undergraduate thesis Princeton University.
  33. Kay RF, 1989, A new small platyrrhine from the Miocene of Colombia and the phyletic position of the callitrichines, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 78, 251
  34. Kay RF, 1990, A possible “giant” tamarin from the Miocene of Colombia, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 81, 248
  35. Kinzey WG, 1981, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, 241
  36. Kleiman DG, 1988, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, 299
  37. Limos da SaRMandGlanderKE(in press) Morphometrics of the woolly spider monkey or muriqui (Brachyteles arachnoides E. Geoffroy 1806).Am. J. Primatol.
  38. Lindsay NBD, 1979, A report on the field study of Geoffroyi's tamarin Saguinus oedipus geoffroyi, Dodo, 16, 27
  39. McNab B, 1983, Advances in the Study of Mammalian Behavior, 664
  40. McNab B, 1990, Body Size in Mammalian Paleobiology: Estimation and Biological Implications, 11
  41. Meldrum DH, 1988, Morphological affinities of the postcranial skeleton of Cebupithecia sarmientoi, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 75, 249
  42. Milton K, 1982, The Ecology of a Tropical Forest: Seasonal Rhythms and Long‐Term Changes, 273
  43. MittermeierRA(1977)Distribution synecology and conservation of Surinam monkeys. Ph.D. dissertation Harvard University.
  44. Mittermeier RA, 1988, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, 13
  45. Mittermeier RA, 1988, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates
  46. Neyman PF, 1978, The Biology and Conservation of the Callitrichidae, 39
  47. Nishimura A, 1988, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, 577
  48. Ramirez M, 1988, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, 539
  49. Robinson JG, 1986, Primate Societies, 69
  50. Robinson JG, 1982, Mammalian Biology in South America, 329
  51. Robinson JG, 1986, Primate Societies, 44
  52. Rose KD, 1981, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, 111
  53. RosenbergerAL(1979)Phylogeny evolution and classification of New World monkeys. Ph.D. dissertation City University of New York.
  54. Rosenberger AL, 1981, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, 9
  55. Rosenberger AL, 1992, Feeding strategies in the past, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 88
  56. Snowdon PT, 1988, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, 223
  57. Soini P, 1981, Informe de Pacaya No. 4. Iquitos
  58. Soini P, 1988, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, 79
  59. Stevenson MF, 1988, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, 131
  60. Stirton RA, 1951, Ceboid monkeys from the Miocene of Colombia, Univ. Calif. Publ. Bull. Dept. Geol. Sci., 28, 315
  61. Stirton RA, 1951, A new monkey from the La Venta Miocene of Colombia. Compilacion de los Estudios Geologicos Oficiales en Colombia, Servicio Geologico Nacional Bogota, 7, 345
  62. Terborgh J, 1985, Key Environments in Amazonia, 284
  63. Thorington RW, 1979, Vertebrate Ecology in the Northern Neotropics, 97
  64. van Roosmalen MGM, 1988, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, 455
  65. van Roosmalen MGM, 1981, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, 419
  66. Wright PC, 1981, Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, 211
  67. WrightPC(1985)The costs and benefits of nocturnality forAotus trivirgatus(the night monkey). Ph.D. dissertation City University of New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 246

Metadata

Authors
Ford, S. M., & Davis, L. C.
Affiliations
Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-08
Volume
88
Issue
4
Pages
415-468
ISSN
  • 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8644
OpenAlex
W2130627208
Cited by
249
References
193
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
New World monkeys, primates, body size, feeding ecology, nutritional strategies, primate evolution, phylogenetic relationships, sexual dimorphism, body weight, Aotus, Callicebus
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Body Constitution, Cebidae, Eating, Ecology, Biological Evolution, Phylogeny, Sex Characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review