Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 11

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Group membership, geography and shared ancestry: Genetic variation in the Basotho of Lesotho

Montinaro, Francesco, Davies, Joseph, Capelli, Cristian·2016·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

Objectives: The investigation of the evolution of cultural and genetic traits and how they interact represents a vibrant area of research in evolutionary genetics, whose dynamics are particularly relevant for our species. One of the key assumptions of the “gene–culture coevolution” framework is the coinheritance of cultural and genetic traits. A corollary of the model is that culturally defined groups with a unique (or a limited number of) common origin(s) whose membership is inherited only through the male or female line are expected to show a relatively low intragroup variation for genetic markers similarly transmitted. Across human societies this is expected to be the case for cultural toponymies and family names within patrilineal and matrilineal groups considered in association with the nonrecombining region of the Y chromosome (NRY) and the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) portion of the genome, respectively. This study aims at exploring the degree of correlation between culture and genetics by investigating the genetic variation of culturally and geographically defined groups. Methods: We analyzed the genetic variation at NRY and mtDNA in 181 individuals from the Basotho, a Southern African patrilineal population from Lesotho, in combination with information about group membership and geographic origin. Results: Our results show that (a) the genetic distance between individuals belonging to the same culturally defined group is lower than the population as a whole when NRY markers are considered; (b) cultural traits have a bigger impact than geography for the within‐group variation of Y chromosome, but not mtDNA; and (c) within‐group genetic variation is compatible with a more homogeneous origin for less common groups. Conclusions: Our results provided additional evidence for the relevance of the dual inheritance model (culture and genetics) in understanding the patterns of human genetic variation, as implied by gene–culture coevolution theory. Am J Phys Anthropol 160:156–161, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.22933

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1002/9781444302714.ch13 · DOI
  2. Cavalli‐Sforza LL, 1981, Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach
  3. 10.1086/425938 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Ellenberger DF., 1912, History of the Basuto, ancient and modern
  5. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu393 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05406.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.2307/1390807 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/molbev/msp022 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Krause EF., 1986, Taxicab geometry: an adventure in non‐Euclidean geometry, Courier Corporation.
  10. 10.1101/gr.092759.109 · DOI
  11. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020053 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/nrg2734 · DOI
  13. Lévi‐Strauss C., 1963, Totemism
  14. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05689.x · DOI
  15. 10.1093/molbev/msu263 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/ejhg.2015.75 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s00439-005-0131-8 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Murphy RF., 1986, Cultural and social anthropology: an overture
  19. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Parkin R, 2007, Kinship and family: an anthropological reader, Blackwell Publ.
  21. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.038 · DOI
  22. 10.1073/pnas.0507611102 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/ejhg.2013.12 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1111/evo.12332 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/ejhg.2015.14 · DOI
  26. 10.1086/590119 · DOI
  27. 10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.001431 · DOI
  28. 10.2307/3001968 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Montinaro, F., Davies, J., & Capelli, C.
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-01-18
Volume
160
Issue
1
Pages
156-161
ISSN
  • 0002-9483
  • 1096-8644
Cited by
11
References
1
Language
en
Funders
Boise Fund Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review