Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Transition to agriculture in South-Eastern Arabia: insights from oral conditions

Munoz, Olivia·2017·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

Objectives: In Southeast (SE) Arabia, agriculture is supposed to expand around 3000 BC, but its tempo and its actual role in populations' subsistence is still debated by archaeologists. Here, we compare dental health conditions of 11 skeletal samples from coastal and inland sites, dated from the Late Neolithic (ca. 4500–3100 BC) to the Early Bronze Age (EBA), conventionally divided into Hafit (ca. 3100–2700 BC) and Umm an‐Nar period (ca. 2700–2000 BC). The goal is to assess long‐term trends in subsistence patterns and regional variability during the local transition to agriculture. Methods: Seven indicators of oral health and childhood stress were analyzed, including dental wear, calculus, caries, alveolar resorption, periapical lesions, ante‐mortem tooth loss (AMTL), and linear enamel hypoplasia (LEH). Results: Neolithic coastal populations are globally characterized by high dental wear, high calculus frequency, high LEH frequency, and frequent periodontal disease, whereas they exhibit low abscesses and AMTL frequencies and a total absence of carious lesions. Samples from the Hafit period present high dental wear, low rates of calculus and LEH, frequent periodontal disease, combined with low abscess and AMTL frequencies and absence of caries. By contrast, samples from the Umm an‐Nar period exhibit much lower dental wear, calculus and LEH rates, whereas caries, periapical lesions and AMTL frequencies increase significantly. Marked differences were observed between coastal and inland Umm an‐Nar groups, the latter presenting significantly higher frequencies of caries, periapical lesions, alveolar resorption and AMTL. Discussion/Conclusion: Oral conditions from the Neolithic coastal populations denote a diet mainly composed of unprocessed and abrasive food, with high protein and low carbohydrate intakes, and frequent stress episodes. Although Hafit populations display some changes in oral pathologies, which indicate modifications in their lifestyle and a diversification of the diet, no markers of high carbohydrate intakes were observed in our samples. The impact of agriculture on oral health appears clearly only from the Umm an‐Nar period, and is more intense inland than on the coast, where marine resources are still a main component of the diet.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.23307

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preservation of other types of bioarchaeological remains in southeastern Arabia, such as macrobotanical, faunal, and human remains, is variable, which limits information about ancient human dietary practices.

    “Preservation of other types of bioarchaeological remains in southeastern Arabia, such as macrobotanical [12], faunal [27,28], and human remains [29–31] is variable, which limits information about ancient human dietary practices.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. 10.1111/j.1600-0471.2009.00315.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. Al‐Jahwari N. S.(2015). The Hafit period in the Oman Peninsula: Cultural and economic changesProceedings of the Symposium: The Archaeological Heritage of Oman Unesco Paris September 7th 2012. Muscat: Ministry of Heritage and Culture (Oman) UNESCO.
  3. Azzarà V. M.(2012). The organisation of food processing at HD‐6 (Sultanate of Oman). In R. Matthews & J. Curtis (Eds.) Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East 12–16 April 2010 the British Museum and UCL London(pp.251–268). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
  4. Azzarà V. M.(2015).L'architecture domestique et l'organisation de la maisonnée dans la péninsule d'Oman à l'âge du Bronze ancien. (PhD Thesis) Université de Paris 1 Panthéon‐Sorbonne Paris.
  5. Beech M.(2004). In the Land of the Ichthyophagi. Modelling fish exploitation in the Arabian Gulf and Gulf of Oman from the 5th millennium BC to the Late Islamic period.BAR International Series 1217. · DOI
  6. 10.1017/S0003598X00052765 · DOI
  7. Benton J.(2006).Burial Practices of the third millennium BC in the Oman peninsula: A Reconsideration. (PhD thesis) University of Sydney Sidney.
  8. Biagi P., 1999, Excavations at the shell‐midden of RH6 1986–1988 (Muscat, Sultanate of Oman), Al‐Rafidan, 57
  9. 10.1080/01811789.1992.10827129 · DOI
  10. Blau S., 2007, Ancient health: Skeletal indicators of agricultural and economic intensification, 190
  11. Bökönyi S., 1992, South Asian archaeology, 45
  12. Bondioli L. Coppa A. &Macchiarelli R.(1998). From the coast to the oasis in Prehistoric Arabia: What the human osteodental remains tell us about the transition from a foraging to the exchange economy? Evidence from Ra's al‐Hamra (Oman) and Hili North (U.A.E.). In G. Afanas'ev S. Cleuziou J. Lukacs & M. Tosi (Eds.) The Prehistory of Arabia and Oceania Proceedings of the XIIIth Congress of the IUPPS Forli 8–14 September 1996(pp.229–234). Forli: ABACO.
  13. Brothwell D. R., 1981, Digging up bones
  14. Cavulli F., 2008, Stone vessels from KHB‐1, Ja'lān region, Sultanate of Oman, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 38, 89
  15. 10.1016/j.legalmed.2010.03.003 · DOI
  16. Charpentier V., 1998, Un village de pêcheurs néolithiques de la péninsule d'Oman: Suwayh 2 (SWY‐2), première campagne de fouille, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 28, 21
  17. Charpentier V., 2003, La nécropole et les derniers horizons Ve millénaire du site de Gorbat al‐Mahar (Suwayh, SWY‐1, Sultanat d'Oman): Premiers résultats, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 33, 11
  18. Cleuziou S., 2005, Aux marges des grands foyers du néolithique. Périphéries débitrices ou créatrices, 123
  19. Cleuziou S., 2007, The model‐based archaeology of socionatural systems, 213
  20. 10.1016/j.crte.2009.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.3406/paleo.1980.4278 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Cleuziou S., 1982, A l'origine des oasis, La Recherche, 137, 1180
  23. Coppa A. &Cucina A.(2007). The Anthropological Analysis.Journal of Oman Studies 14(pp.203–342). Muscat: Ministry of Heritage and Culture Sultanate of Oman.
  24. Costantini L., 2001, Plant and insect remains from the Bronze Age site of Ra's al‐Jinz (RJ‐2), Sultanate of Oman, Paléorient, 26, 143, 10.3406/paleo.2000.4705 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1600-0471.2011.00345.x · DOI
  26. El‐Mahi A. T., 2000, Traditional fish preservation in Oman: The seasonality of a subsistence strategy, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 30, 99
  27. 10.1002/ajpa.20362 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1600-0471.2005.00040.x · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.crte.2009.03.005 · DOI
  30. Goodman A. H., 1991, Advances in dental anthropology, 279
  31. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170354 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jas.2012.07.017 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1002/ajpa.22360 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Hammer Ø., 2001, PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis, Paleontologia Electronica, 4, 1
  35. Hoch E., 1995, The island of Umm An‐Nar, Vol. 2. The third millennium settlement, 249
  36. Højgaard K., 1981, Dentition on Umm an‐Nar, c. 2500 B.C, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 11, 31
  37. Højgaard K., 1985, South Asian Archaeology 1983, 151
  38. Kiesewetter H., 2006, The Archaeology of Jebel al‐Buhais, Volume 1 ‐ Funeral Monuments and Human Remains from Jebel al‐Buhais, 103
  39. Larsen C. S., 1991, Advances in dental anthropology, 179
  40. 10.1002/ajpa.1330920403 · DOI
  41. Lukacs J. R., 1989, Reconstruction of life from the skeleton, 261
  42. 10.1002/ajpa.1330870202 · DOI
  43. 10.1007/BF02443988 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/ajpa.1330780411 · DOI
  45. 10.1111/j.1600-0471.2007.00290.x · DOI
  46. McSweeney K., 2010, Death and burial in Arabia and beyond, 45
  47. Marcucci L. G., 2014, New investigations at the prehistoric shell midden of Ra's al‐Hamra 6 (Sultanate of Oman): Results of the 2012 and 2013 excavation seasons, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 44, 235
  48. Marcucci L. G., 2011, Recent investigations at the prehistoric site RH‐5 (Ra's al‐Hamra, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman), Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 41, 201
  49. Méry S., 2000, Les céramiques d'Oman et l'Asie moyenne. Une archéologie des échanges à l'âge du bronze
  50. Munoz O.(2011). Etude anthropologique des restes humains des cairns C2 et C3 du Jebel Hafit (1977). In S. †Cleuziou S. Méry & B. Vogt (Eds.) Protohistoire de l'oasis d'al‐Aïn Travaux de la Mission archéologique française à Abou Dhabi (Emirats Arabes Unis) Vol. 1 Les sépultures de l'âge du Bronze(pp.218–224). Oxford: BAR S2227 International Series.
  51. Munoz O.(2014).Pratiques funéraires et paramètres biologiques dans la péninsule d'Oman du Néolithique à la fin de l'âge du Bronze ancien (V‐IIIe mill. avant notre ère). (PhD Thesis) Université de Paris 1 Panthéon‐Sorbonne/Università di Roma La Sapienza Paris.
  52. Munoz O., 2015, Le funéraire. Mémoire, protocoles, monuments, 255
  53. Munoz O., 2012, Aux marges de l'archéologie. Hommage à serge cleuziou, 451
  54. Munoz O., 2010, Death and burial in arabia and beyond, 25
  55. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199903)108:3<333::AID-AJPA8>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI
  56. Potts D. T., 2001, United Arab Emirates. A new perspective, 28
  57. Salvatori S., 2007, The Prehistoric Graveyard of Ra's al‐Hamra 5, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, The Journal of Oman Studies, 14, 5
  58. 10.1016/j.jchb.2010.01.034 · DOI
  59. 10.1002/ajpa.1330630107 · DOI
  60. 10.1177/00220345660450054701 · DOI
  61. 10.1002/9781118845486.ch15 · DOI
  62. 10.1080/004382400409899 · DOI
  63. Tengberg M., 2008, The archaeology of Jebel Al‐Buhais, Volume 2 ‐ The natural environment of Jebel Al‐Buhais: Past and present, 83
  64. 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.11.022 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Tosi M., 1975, Notes on the distribution and exploitation of natural resources in ancient Oman, Journal of Oman Studies, 1, 187
  66. 10.1002/ajpa.1330510413 · DOI
  67. Uerpmann M., 2003, Archaeology of the United Arab Emirates, 74
  68. Uerpmann H.‐P., 2008, The archaeology of Jebel Al‐Buhais, Volume 2 ‐ The natural environment of Jebel Al‐Buhais: Past and present
  69. Usai D., 2006, A fourth‐millennium BC Oman site and its context: Wadi Shab‐GAS1, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 36, 275
  70. Willcox G., 1995, The island of Umm an‐Nar : the third millenium settlement, 257
  71. 10.1111/aae.1995.6.2.129 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1111/aae.12031 · DOI
  73. 10.1002/ajpa.22434 · DOI
  74. 10.1017/RDC.2016.3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Munoz, O.
Affiliations
UMR 7041 ‐ ArScAn, Team « Du village à l'État au Proche et Moyen‐Orient », Maison de l'Archéologie et de l'Ethnologie, 21 allée de l'Université F‐92023 Nanterre cedex France
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09-06
Volume
164
Issue
4
Pages
702-719
ISSN
  • 0002-9483
  • 1096-8644
Cited by
24
References
0
Language
en
Funders
Fondation Fyssen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review