Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The agricultural basis of Umm an‐Nar society in the northern Oman peninsula (2500–2000 BC)

Al‐Jahwari, Nasser Said·2009·Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy

Abstract

This paper argues that the agricultural aspect of the Umm an‐Nar economy has been largely ignored by researchers, due to an overemphasis on copper production and trade. This is true at the level of the smallest rural settlements, villages and settlements whose primary focus was agricultural production. The key social developments of this period have often been explained by linking them to the exploitation of copper ore and its trade with surrounding regions such as Mesopotamia and the Indus. However, this paper will argue — based on quantified pottery analysis — that it is during this time that we see the development, for the first time in the Oman peninsula, of widespread sedentary occupation that was based on small agricultural villages where there is no evidence of copper ore exploitation, thus suggesting that the economic basis of Umm an‐Nar society was essentially agricultural. Furthermore, it will be argued that, through the use of a new survey methodology, it is possible to locate such settlements, even where they have left no traces of monuments, such as tombs or round towers. The methodology allows preliminary comparisons to be made between the intensity of occupation in different periods. The paper also argues that the Umm an‐Nar period was one of the most intensive periods of occupation in pre‐Islamic history.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0471.2009.00315.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Umm an-Nar period is characterised by growth of sedentary settlements, changes in funerary practices, adoption of oasis agriculture, and expansion of long-distance exchange networks.

    “This period is characterised by many social changes, including the growth of sedentary settlements [10], changes in funerary practices[11], the adoption of oasis agriculture [12], and the expansion of long-distance exchange networks between regions around the Persian Gulf and Arabian Sea [13,14].”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Benton J.N., 1996, ABIEL I: New Research on the Arabian Peninsula, 34
  2. 10.1111/j.1600-0471.1996.tb00098.x · DOI
  3. 10.1017/S0003598X00088797 · DOI
  4. Brunswig R.H., 1989, Cultural History, Environment and Economy as seen from an Umm an‐Nar Settlement: Evidence from Test Excavations at Bāt, Oman, 1977/78, Journal of Oman Studies, 10, 9
  5. Charpentier V., 1994, A Specialized Production at Regional Scale in Bronze Age Arabia: Shell Rings from Ra’s al‐Junayz Area (Sultanate of Oman), South Asian Archaeology, 1, 157
  6. Cleuziou S., 1980, Three Seasons at Hili: Toward a Chronology and Cultural History of the Oman Peninsula in the 3rd Millennium B.C, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 10, 19
  7. Cleuziou S., 1982, Hili and the Beginning of Oasis Life in Eastern Arabia, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 12, 15
  8. Cleuziou S., 1989, Excavations at Hili 8: A Preliminary Report on the 4th to 7th Campaigns, Archaeology of the United Arab Emirates, 5, 61
  9. Cleuziou S., 2002, Essays on the Late Prehistory of the Arabian Peninsula, 191
  10. Cleuziou S., 2000, Ra’s al‐Jinz and the Prehistoric Coastal Cultures of the Ja’alān, Journal of Oman Studies, 11, 19
  11. Cleuziou S., 2007, In the Shadow of the Ancestors: the Prehistoric Foundations of the Early Arabian Civilization in Oman
  12. Cleuziou S., 1983, Umm an‐Nar Burial Customs: New Evidence from Tomb A at Hili North, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 13, 37
  13. Costa P.M., 1987, The Hinterland of Sohar: Archaeological Surveys and Excavations within the Region of an Omani Seafaring City, Journal of Oman Studies, 9, 93
  14. Costantini L., 2000, Plant and Insect Remains from the Bronze Age Site of Ra’s Al‐Jinz (RJ‐2), Sultanate of Oman, Paléorient, 26, 143, 10.3406/paleo.2000.4705 · DOI
  15. David H., 1996, Styles and Evolution: Soft Stone Vessels during the Bronze Age in the Oman Peninsula, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 26, 31
  16. David H., 2002, Soft‐Stone Vessels from Umm an‐Nar Tombs at Hili (UAE): A Comparison, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 32, 175
  17. 10.1525/aa.1992.94.1.02a00070 · DOI
  18. Frifelt K., 1985, Further Evidence of the Third Millennium B.C. Town at Bāt in Oman, Journal of Oman Studies, 7, 89
  19. Frifelt K., 1991, The Island of Umm an‐Nar: Vol.1, The Third Millennium Graves
  20. Frifelt K., 2002, Essays on the Late Prehistory of the Arabian Peninsula, 101
  21. Häser J., 2000, Formation and Transformation Processes of Oasis Settlements in the Sultanate of Oman: Preliminary Report on a New Field Project, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 30, 115
  22. Häser J., 2003, Archaeological results of the 1999 and 2000 survey campaigns in Wādī Banī‘Awf and the Region of al‐Hamrā’ (Central Oman), Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 33, 21
  23. Ibrahim M., 2000, Oasis Settlement in Oman: Pilot Study 1999–2000
  24. Al‐Jahwari N.S., 2008, Settlement Patterns, Development and Cultural Change in the Northern Oman Peninsula: a multi‐tiered approach to the analysis of long‐term settlement trends,
  25. Al‐Jahwari N.S., 2008, A field methodology for the quantification of ancient settlement in an Arabian context, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 38, 203
  26. 10.1111/j.1600-0471.1999.tb00126.x · DOI
  27. Meadow R.H., 1976, Proceedings of the IV Annual Symposium of Archaeological Research in Iran, 110
  28. Méry S., 1996, The Prehistory of Asia and Oceania: Trade as a Subsistence Strategy, Post Pleistocene Adaptations in Arabia and Early Maritime Trade in the Indian Ocean, 16 (Colloquium XXXII), 167
  29. Méry S., 2000, Les céramiques d’Oman et l’Asie moyenne: une archéologie des échanges à l’Age du Bronze
  30. Méry S., 2001, Re‐Excavation of the Early Bronze Age Collective Hili N Pit‐Grave (Emirate of Abu Dhabi, UAE): Results of the First Two Campaigns of the Emirati‐French Project, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 31, 161
  31. 10.2307/4200407 · DOI
  32. 10.2307/4200386 · DOI
  33. 10.2307/4200469 · DOI
  34. Potts D.T., 1978, Towards an Integrated History of Culture Change in the Arabian Gulf Area: Notes on Dilmun, Makkan and the Economy of Ancient Sumer, Journal of Oman Studies, 4, 29
  35. Potts D.T., 1990, The Arabian Gulf in Antiquity: From Prehistory to the Fall of the Achaemenid Empire
  36. 10.2307/4200436 · DOI
  37. Potts D.T., 2000, Ancient Magan: The Secrets of Tell Abraq
  38. 10.1057/9780230618459_2 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Schreiber J., 2004, Archaeological Reconnaissance at Izki and the Jebel Akhdar: Transformation Processes of Oasis Settlement in Oman 2004, Third Stage: A Preliminary Report, Occident & Orient, 9, 6
  40. Schreiber J., 2005, Archaeological Survey at Ibra in the Sharqiyah, Sultanate of Oman, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 35, 255
  41. Schreiber J., 2007, ‘Transformation processes in oasis settlements in Oman’ 2005 archaeological survey at the oasis of Nizwā: a preliminary report, Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 37, 263
  42. Schreiber J., 2007, Transformationsprozesse in Oasensidelungen Omans. Die Vorislamische Zeit Am Beispiel Von Izki, Nizwa und Dem Jebel Akhdar
  43. Schreiber J., 2004, Archaeological survey at Tiwi and its hinterland (Central Oman), Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 34, 319
  44. Al‐Tikriti W.Y., 1981, Reconsideration of the Late Fourth and Third Millennium B.C. in the Arabian Gulf with Special Reference to the United Arab Emirates, vols 1–2
  45. Weeks L.R., 2004, Early Metallurgy of the Persian Gulf: Technology, Trade, and the Bronze Age World
  46. Weisgerber G., 1980, ‘…und Kupfer in Oman’— Das Oman‐Projekt des Deutschen Bergbau‐Museums, Der Anschnitt, 2, 62
  47. Weisgerber G., 1981, Mehr als Kupfer in Oman: Ergebnisse der Expedition 1981, Der Anschnitt, 5, 174
  48. Weisgerber G., 1983, Copper Production during the Third Millennium BC in Oman and the Question of Makran, Journal of Oman Studies, 6, 269
  49. Weisgerber G., 2007, Proceedings of the International Symposium: Archaeology of the Arabian Peninsula through the Ages (7th–9th May 2006)
  50. Weisgerber G., 2007, In the Shadow of the Ancestors: The Prehistoric Foundations of the Early Arabian Civilization in Oman, 277
  51. 10.2307/j.ctv1jf2ddx · DOI · Paper page
  52. Willcox G., 1995, The Island of Umm an‐Nar: Vol.2 the Third Millennium Settlement, 257

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Al‐Jahwari, N. S.
Venue
Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10-26
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
122-133
ISSN
  • 0905-7196
  • 1600-0471
Cited by
32
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review