Cited by 52Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Cognitively healthy centenarians are genetically protected against Alzheimer's disease

Open access
Tesi, Niccolo’, van der Lee, Sven, Hulsman, Marc, van Schoor, Natasja M., Huisman, Martijn, Pijnenburg, Yolande, van der Flier, Wiesje M., Reinders, Marcel +1 more·2024·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) prevalence increases with age, yet a small fraction of the population reaches ages > 100 years without cognitive decline. We studied the genetic factors associated with such resilience against AD. METHODS: Genome‐wide association studies identified 86 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with AD risk. We estimated SNP frequency in 2281 AD cases, 3165 age‐matched controls, and 346 cognitively healthy centenarians. We calculated a polygenic risk score (PRS) for each individual and investigated the functional properties of SNPs enriched/depleted in centenarians. RESULTS: Cognitively healthy centenarians were enriched with the protective alleles of the SNPs associated with AD risk. The protective effect concentrated on the alleles in/near ANKH, GRN, TMEM106B, SORT1, PLCG2, RIN3 , and APOE genes. This translated to >5‐fold lower PRS in centenarians compared to AD cases ( P = 7.69 × 10 −71 ), and 2‐fold lower compared to age‐matched controls ( P = 5.83 × 10 −17 ). DISCUSSION: Maintaining cognitive health until extreme ages requires complex genetic protection against AD, which concentrates on the genes associated with the endolysosomal and immune systems. Highlights: Cognitively healthy cent enarians are enriched with the protective alleles of genetic variants associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The protective effect is concentrated on variants involved in the immune and endolysosomal systems. Combining variants into a polygenic risk score (PRS) translated to > 5‐fold lower PRS in centenarians compared to AD cases, and ≈ 2‐fold lower compared to middle‐aged healthy controls.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alz.13810

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. [3]2012 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimer's & Dementia. 2012; 8: 131‐ 168. 22404854
  2. [4]Perls T. Dementia‐free centenarians. Exp Gerontol. 2004; 39: 1587‐ 1593. 15582273
  3. [5]Holstege H, Beker N, Dijkstra T, et al. The 100‐plus Study of cognitively healthy centenarians: rationale, design and cohort description. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018; 33: 1229‐ 1249. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0451-3 30362018 PMC6290855 · DOI
  4. [6]Winblad B, Amouyel P, Andrieu S, et al. Defeating Alzheimer's disease and other dementias: a priority for European science and society. The Lancet Neurology. 2016; 15: 455‐ 532. 26987701
  5. [8]Holstege H, Hulsman M, Charbonnier C, et al. Exome sequencing identifies rare damaging variants in ATP8B4 and ABCA1 as risk factors for Alzheimer's disease. Nat Genet. 2022; 54: 1786‐ 1794. 36411364 PMC9729101
  6. [9]Gatz M, Reynolds CA, Fratiglioni L, et al. Role of genes and environments for explaining Alzheimer disease. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006; 63: 168‐ 174. 16461860
  7. [10]Bellenguez C, Küçükali F, Jansen IE, et al. New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Nat Genet. 2022; 54: 412‐ 436. 35379992 PMC9005347
  8. [11]Malik M, Simpson JF, Parikh I, et al. CD33 Alzheimer's risk‐altering polymorphism, CD33 expression, and exon 2 splicing. J Neurosci. 2013; 33: 13320‐ 13325. 23946390 PMC3742922
  9. [12]Sebastiani P, Perls TT. The genetics of extreme longevity: lessons from the new England centenarian study. Front Genet. 2012; 3: 277. 23226160 PMC3510428
  10. [13]Seto M, Weiner RL, Dumitrescu L, Hohman TJ. Protective genes and pathways in Alzheimer's disease: moving towards precision interventions. Mol Neurodegeneration. 2021; 16: 29. PMC8086309 33926499
  11. [14]Joshi PK, Pirastu N, Kentistou KA, et al. Genome‐wide meta‐analysis associates HLA‐DQA1/DRB1 and LPA and lifestyle factors with human longevity. Nat Commun. 2017; 8(1): 910. 29030599 PMC5715013
  12. [17]van der Flier WM, Scheltens P. Amsterdam dementia cohort: performing research to optimize care. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. 2018; 62: 1091‐ 1111. PMC5870023 29562540
  13. [18]Dreves MAE, van Harten AC, Visser LNC, et al. Rationale and design of the ABOARD project (A Personalized Medicine Approach for Alzheimer's Disease). A&D Transl Res & Clin Interv. 2023; 9: e12401. PMC10242186 37287472
  14. [19]van der Flier WM, de Vugt ME, Smets EMA, Blom M, Teunissen CE. Towards a future where Alzheimer's disease pathology is stopped before the onset of dementia. Nat Aging. 2023; 3: 494‐ 505. 37202515
  15. [21]Hoogendijk EO, Deeg DJH, Poppelaars J, et al. The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam: cohort update 2016 and major findings. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016; 31: 927‐ 945. 27544533 PMC5010587
  16. [22]Willemsen G, de Geus EJC, Bartels M, et al. The Netherlands twin register biobank: a resource for genetic epidemiological studies. Twin Research and Human Genetics. 2010; 13: 231‐ 245. 20477721
  17. [23]de Rojas I, Moreno‐Grau S, Tesi N, et al. Common variants in Alzheimer's disease and risk stratification by polygenic risk scores. Nat Commun. 2021; 12: 3417. 34099642 PMC8184987
  18. [25]Anderson CA, Pettersson FH, Clarke GM, Cardon LR, Morris AP, Zondervan KT. Data quality control in genetic case‐control association studies. Nat Protoc. 2010; 5: 1564‐ 1573. 21085122 PMC3025522
  19. [26]1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Auton A, Brooks LD, et al, 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015; 526: 68‐ 74. 26432245 PMC4750478
  20. [27]Tesi N, van der Lee S, Hulsman M, Holstege H, Reinders MJT. snpXplorer: a web application to explore human SNP‐associations and annotate SNP‐sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49: W603‐ W612. 34048563 PMC8262737
  21. [28]Moore CM, Jacobson SA, Fingerlin TE. Power and sample size calculations for genetic association studies in the presence of genetic model misspecification. Hum Hered. 2019; 84: 256‐ 271. 32721961 PMC7666027
  22. [29]Slot RER, Verfaillie SCJ, Overbeek JM, et al. Subjective Cognitive Impairment Cohort (SCIENCe): study design and first results. Alzheimer's Research & Therapy. 2018; 10(1): 76. PMC6080529 30081935
  23. [30]Katsumata Y, Shade LM, Hohman TJ, et al. Multiple gene variants linked to Alzheimer's‐type clinical dementia via GWAS are also associated with non‐Alzheimer's neuropathologic entities. Neurobiol Dis. 2022; 174: 105880. 36191742 PMC9641973
  24. [31]Nugent S, Potvin O, Cunnane SC, Chen T‐H, Duchesne S. Associating Type 2 diabetes risk factor genes and FDG‐PET brain metabolism in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020; 12: 580633. 33192474 PMC7661639
  25. [32]Pendleton A, Johnson MD, Hughes A, et al. Mutations in ANKH cause chondrocalcinosis. Am Hum Genet. 2002; 71: 933‐ 940. PMC378546 12297987
  26. [33]Rhinn H, Abeliovich A. Differential aging analysis in human cerebral cortex identifies variants in TMEM106B and GRN that Regulate Aging Phenotypes. Cell Syst. 2017; 4: 404‐ 415..e5. 28330615
  27. [34]Finch N, Carrasquillo MM, Baker M, et al. TMEM106B regulates progranulin levels and the penetrance of FTLD in GRN mutation carriers. Neurology. 2011; 76: 467‐ 474. 21178100 PMC3034409
  28. [35]Simon MJ, Logan T, DeVos SL, Di Paolo G. Lysosomal functions of progranulin and implications for treatment of frontotemporal dementia. Trends Cell Biol. 2023; 33: 324‐ 339. 36244875
  29. [36]Van Deerlin VM, Sleiman PMA, Martinez‐Lage M, et al. Common variants at 7p21 are associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP‐43 inclusions. Nat Genet. 2010; 42: 234‐ 239. 20154673 PMC2828525
  30. [38]Shen R, Zhao X, He L, et al. Upregulation of RIN3 induces endosomal dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Transl Neurodegener. 2020; 9: 26. 32552912 PMC7301499
  31. [39]Shashoua VE. Ependymin, a brain extracellular glycoprotein, and CNS plasticity. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1991; 627: 94‐ 114. 1831964
  32. [40]Li M, Geng R, Li C, et al. Dysregulated gene‐associated biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease and aging. Translational Neuroscience. 2021; 12: 83‐ 95. 33623715 PMC7885957
  33. [41]Xing L, Martyniuk CJ, Esau C, Da Fonte DF, Trudeau VL. Proteomic profiling reveals dopaminergic regulation of progenitor cell functions of goldfish radial glial cells in vitro. J Proteomics. 2016; 144: 123‐ 132. 27185549
  34. [42]Tesi N, van der Lee SJ, Hulsman M, et al. Polygenic risk score of longevity predicts longer survival across an age continuum. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A. 2020; 76(5): 750‐ 759. PMC8087277 33216869
  35. [45]Zhong L, Chen X‐F, Wang T, et al. Soluble TREM2 induces inflammatory responses and enhances microglial survival. J Exp Med. 2017; 214: 597‐ 607. 28209725 PMC5339672
  36. [46]Diks AM, Teodosio C, De Mooij B, et al. Carriers of the p.P522R variant in PLCγ2 have a slightly more responsive immune system. Mol Neurodegeneration. 2023; 18: 25. PMC10116473 37081539
  37. [48]Mishra S, Knupp A, Szabo MP, et al. The Alzheimer's gene SORL1 is a regulator of endosomal traffic and recycling in human neurons. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2022; 79: 162. 35226190 PMC8885486
  38. [49]Zhang M, Ganz AB, Rohde S, et al. The correlation between neuropathology levels and cognitive performance in centenarians. Alzheimer's & Dementia. 2023; 19(11): 5036‐ 5047. 37092333
  39. [51]Arboleda‐Velasquez JF, Lopera F, O'Hare M, et al. Resistance to autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease in an APOE3 Christchurch homozygote: a case report. Nat Med. 2019; 25: 1680‐ 1683. 31686034 PMC6898984
  40. [52]Beker N, Sikkes SAM, Hulsman M, et al. Longitudinal maintenance of cognitive health in centenarians in the 100‐plus Study. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3: e200094. 32101309 PMC7137688
  41. [53]Deelen J, Beekman M, Uh H‐W, et al. Genome‐wide association meta‐analysis of human longevity identifies a novel locus conferring survival beyond 90 years of age. Hum Mol Genet. 2014; 23: 4420‐ 4432. 24688116 PMC4103672
  42. [55]Timmers PR, Mounier N, Lall K, et al. Genomics of 1 million parent lifespans implicates novel pathways and common diseases and distinguishes survival chances. eLife. 2019; 8: e39856. 30642433 PMC6333444
  43. [56]Timmers PRHJ, Wilson JF, Joshi PK, Deelen J. Multivariate genomic scan implicates novel loci and haem metabolism in human ageing. Nat Commun. 2020; 11: 3570. 32678081 PMC7366647
  44. [57]Poon LW, Woodard JL, Stephen Miller L, et al. Understanding dementia prevalence among centenarians. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2012; 67A: 358‐ 365. PMC3309877 22389466
  45. [58]Sherva R, Zhang R, Sahelijo N, et al. African ancestry GWAS of dementia in a large military cohort identifies significant risk loci. Mol Psychiatry. 2023; 28: 1293‐ 1302. 36543923 PMC10066923

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tesi, N., van der Lee, S., Hulsman, M., van Schoor, N. M., Huisman, M., Pijnenburg, Y., van der Flier, W. M., Reinders, M., & Holstege, H.
Affiliations
  • Delft Bioinformatics Lab Delft University of Technology Delft The Netherlands
  • Department of Clinical Genetics Section Genomics of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Aging Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam The Netherlands
  • Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
  • Department of Epidemiology and Data Sciences Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Department of Neurology Alzheimer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam The Netherlands
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Holstege, Henne
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-04-18
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
3864-3875
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W4394917769
Cited by
52
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 8
FWCI
14.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • ZonMw (LSHM20106, #73305095007)
  • Hersenstichting
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, centenarians
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Case-Control Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Multifactorial Inheritance, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review