TRAILBLAZER‐ALZ 4: A phase 3 trial comparing donanemab with aducanumab on amyloid plaque clearance in early, symptomatic Alzheimer's disease
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: The phase 3, open‐label TRAILBLAZER‐ALZ 4 study compared the effect of donanemab versus aducanumab on amyloid plaque (AP) clearance in participants with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: Participants ( n = 148) were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous donanemab (700 mg every 4 weeks for three doses, then 1400 mg every 4 weeks thereafter) or aducanumab (per label). AP was measured with florbetapir F 18 positron emission tomography. AP clearance was defined as < 24.1 Centiloids. RESULTS: At 6, 12, and 18 months, AP clearance was achieved in 37.9%, 70.0%, and 76.8%, respectively, of donanemab‐treated participants versus 1.6%, 24.6%, and 43.1% of aducanumab‐treated participants ( P < 0.001). Median time to clearance was 359 versus 568 days for donanemab‐ versus aducanumab‐treated participants ( P < 0.001). Amyloid‐related imaging abnormality (ARIA)‐edema/effusion occurred in 23.9% and 34.8% of donanemab‐ and aducanumab‐treated participants, respectively. DISCUSSION: Donanemab treatment resulted in earlier and greater AP clearance compared to aducanumab. ARIA frequencies were consistent with prior studies. Clinical trial registration: No: NCT05108922, TRAILBLAZER‐ALZ 4 Highlights: Here we report the first direct comparator study of two amyloid‐targeting therapies. This was the first investigation of donanemab on biomarker efficacy regardless of tau levels. Donanemab demonstrated superiority over aducanumab in amyloid plaque (AP) clearance. The depth and speed of AP removal did not affect amyloid‐related imaging abnormality risk or incidence.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease
Jack, C. R., Bennett, D. A., Blennow, K., Carrillo, M. C., Dunn, B., Haeberlein, S. B., Holtzman, D. M., Jagust, W., Jessen, F., Karlawish, J., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 · Cited by 10,537 · see citing works
Donanemab in Early Alzheimer’s Disease
Mintun, M. A., Lo, A. C., Duggan Evans, C., Wessels, A. M., Ardayfio, P. A., Andersen, S. W., Shcherbinin, S., Sparks, J., Sims, J. R., Brys, M., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2100708 · Cited by 1,728 · cited 1× · see citing works
“13,14,19,20 The key secondary outcomes”
Self-citationFleisher, A. S., Pontecorvo, M. J., Devous, M. D., Lu, M., Arora, A. K., Truocchio, S. P., Aldea, P., Flitter, M., Locascio, T., Devine, M., et al. (2020) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0528 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Self-citationJeremic, D., Jiménez-Díaz, L., & Navarro-López, J. D. (2021) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2021.101496 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Ferrero, J., Williams, L., Stella, H., Leitermann, K., Mikulskis, A., O'Gorman, J., & Sevigny, J. (2016) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.trci.2016.06.002 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Liu, H.-J., Wang, M., Wang, Y., Shi, S., Hu, X., Zhang, D.-B., Fan, D., Mintzer, J., & Xu, P. (2025) · Cell Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.celbio.2025.100158 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Salloway, S., Pain, A., Lee, E., Papka, M., Ferguson, M. B., Wang, H., Hu, H., Lu, M., Oru, E., Ardayfio, P. A., Hoban, D. B., Collins, E. C., Brooks, D. A., & Sims, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Brown University (US)
- Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
- Irvine Clinical Research Irvine California USA
- The Cognitive and Research Center of New Jersey LLC Springfield New Jersey USA
- Corresponding author
- Pain, Andrew
- ORCID
- Venue
- Alzheimer's & Dementia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e70293-e70293
- ISSN
- 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5279
- PMC
- PMC12089073
- OpenAlex
- W4410510363
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 11
- FWCI
- 20.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- donanemab, aducanumab
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Positron-Emission Tomography, Plaque, Amyloid, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review