Positron Emission Tomography Imaging With [ 18 F]flortaucipir and Postmortem Assessment of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Positron emission tomography (PET) may increase the diagnostic accuracy and confirm the underlying neuropathologic changes of Alzheimer disease (AD). Objective: To determine the accuracy of antemortem [ 18 F]flortaucipir PET images for predicting the presence of AD-type tau pathology at autopsy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study (A16 primary cohort) was conducted from October 2015 to June 2018 at 28 study sites (27 in US sites and 1 in Australia). Individuals with a terminal illness who were older than 50 years and had a projected life expectancy of less than 6 months were enrolled. All participants underwent [ 18 F]flortaucipir PET imaging, and scans were interpreted by 5 independent nuclear medicine physicians or radiologists. Supplemental autopsy [ 18 F]flortaucipir images and pathological samples were also collected from 16 historically collected cases. A second study (FR01 validation study) was conducted from March 26 to April 26, 2019, in which 5 new readers assessed the original PET images for comparison to autopsy. Main Outcomes and Measures: [ 18 F]flortaucipir PET images were visually assessed and compared with immunohistochemical tau pathology. An AD tau pattern of flortaucipir retention was assessed for correspondence with a postmortem B3-level (Braak stage V or VI) pathological pattern of tau accumulation and to the presence of amyloid-β plaques sufficient to meet the criteria for high levels of AD neuropathological change. Success was defined as having at least 3 of the 5 readers above the lower bounds of the 95% CI for both sensitivity and specificity of 50% or greater. Results: A total of 156 patients were enrolled in the A16 study and underwent [ 18 F]flortaucipir PET imaging. Of these, 73 died during the study, and valid autopsies were performed for 67 of these patients. Three autopsies were evaluated as test cases and removed from the primary cohort (n = 64). Of the 64 primary cohort patients, 34 (53%) were women and 62 (97%) were white; mean (SD) age was 82.5 (9.6) years; and 49 (77%) had dementia, 1 (2%) had mild cognitive impairment, and 14 (22%) had normal cognition. Prespecified success criteria were met for the A16 primary cohort. The flortaucipir PET scans predicted a B3 level of tau pathology, with sensitivity ranging from 92.3% (95% CI, 79.7%-97.3%) to 100.0% (95% CI, 91.0%-100.0%) and specificity ranging from 52.0% (95% CI, 33.5%-70.0%) to 92.0% (95% CI, 75.0%-97.8%). A high level of AD neuropathological change was predicted with sensitivity of 94.7% (95% CI, 82.7%-98.5%) to 100.0% (95% CI, 90.8%-100.0%) and specificity of 50.0% (95% CI, 32.1%-67.9%) to 92.3% (95% CI, 75.9%-97.9%). The FR01 validation study also met prespecified success criteria. Addition of the supplemental autopsy data set and 3 test cases, which comprised a total of 82 patients and autopsies for both the A16 and FR01 studies, resulted in improved specificity and comparable overall accuracy. Among the 156 enrolled participants, 14 (9%) experienced at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event. Conclusions and Relevance: This study’s findings suggest that PET imaging with [ 18 F]flortaucipir could be used to identify the density and distribution of AD-type tau pathology and the presence of high levels of AD neuropathological change, supporting a neuropathological diagnosis of AD.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a prospective autopsy-validated diagnostic study, [18F]flortaucipir PET visual reads detected B3-level tau neurofibrillary tangles and high Alzheimer disease neuropathologic change with high sensitivity and moderate-to-high specificity. A second independent reader validation study confirmed the findings, and quantitative SUVR analysis also showed high specificity.
Key findings
In the A16 primary cohort (n = 64), flortaucipir PET met prespecified success criteria for detecting B3 NFT score: sensitivity ranged from 92.3% (95% CI, 79.7%-97.3%) to 100.0% (95% CI, 91.0%-100.0%) and specificity from 52.0% (95% CI, 33.5%-70.0%) to 92.0% (95% CI, 75.0%-97.8%) across 5 readers; majority read sensitivity was 92.3% and specificity 80.0%. For high ADNC, sensitivity ranged from 94.7% (95% CI, 82.7%-98.5%) to 100.0% (95% CI, 90.8%-100.0%) and specificity from 50.0% (95% CI, 32.1%-67.9%) to 92.3% (95% CI, 75.9%-97.9%); majority read sensitivity was 94.7% and specificity 80.8%.
- In the full autopsy data set (n = 82), B3 sensitivity ranged from 89.1% (95% CI, 77.0%-95.3%) to 93.5% (95% CI, 82.5%-97.8%) and specificity from 66.7% (95% CI, 50.3%-79.8%) to 94.4% (95% CI, 81.9%-98.5%); high ADNC sensitivity ranged from 95.1% (95% CI, 83.9%-98.7%) to 97.6% (95% CI, 87.4%-99.6%) and specificity from 65.9% (95% CI, 50.5%-78.4%) to 90.2% (95% CI, 77.5%-96.1%). Majority read results were B3 sensitivity 89.1% and specificity 86.1%, and high ADNC sensitivity 95.1% and specificity 82.9%.
- The FR01 validation study also met prespecified success criteria. Interrater reliability was high: A16 all read scans (n = 105) showed 89.9% agreement (Fleiss κ, 0.80; P < .001), A16 primary cohort scans (n = 64) showed 88.4% agreement (Fleiss κ, 0.74; P < .001), and FR01 (n = 82) had Fleiss κ 0.82 (P < .001).
- Quantitative SUVR analysis in 60 of 67 scans meeting quality criteria established an optimal cut point greater than 1.113, yielding sensitivity of 84.2% for B3 NFT score and 86.5% for high ADNC, with 100% specificity for both. Safety: 14 of 156 enrolled participants (9%) had at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event; agitation (n = 3) and headache (n = 2) were most common, and 3 participants (2%) had serious adverse events within 48 hours, including 2 deaths reported as not associated with study drug or procedure.
Methods
This multicenter diagnostic study (A16 primary cohort; NCT02516046) enrolled participants older than 50 years with terminal illness and projected life expectancy less than 6 months, ranging from clinically normal cognition to dementia, at 28 sites (27 US, 1 Australia) from October 2015 through June 2018. The A16 primary cohort included 64 participants with valid evaluable flortaucipir images and autopsy; the full autopsy data set included 82 cases (64 primary cohort, 2 evaluable test cases, 16 supplemental historically collected autopsy cases), and a separate FR01 validation study (NCT03901092) reinterpreted 82 images.
- PET imaging was acquired for 20 minutes (4 × 5-minute frames) beginning approximately 80 minutes after intravenous 370 (±10%) MBq [18F]flortaucipir; scans were visually rated by 5 blinded nuclear medicine physicians or radiologists as negative, moderate, or advanced AD tau pattern, and quantitative SUVRs used a PERSI white matter reference region and a weighted neocortical target.
- Neuropathological assessment was performed by 2 blinded authors using NIA–AA guidelines, with AT8 immunohistochemistry for Braak NFT staging and 6E10 for amyloid plaque; primary comparisons were flortaucipir PET classification against B3 NFT score (Braak V-VI) and high ADNC level. Analyses calculated sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, predictive values, and likelihood ratios per reader and for majority read, with Wilson 95% CIs, Fleiss and simple κ statistics, and ROC analysis for the SUVR cut point.
Limitations
The paper states that the A16 cohort was older than typical symptomatic AD trial populations, had more advanced clinical disease with only 1 case of mild cognitive impairment, and lacked racial/ethnic diversity; visual reads showed best accuracy for the most advanced NFT tau load and ADNC, and earlier AD stages may meet intermediate pathological criteria or have neuritic plaque without substantial tau. The paper also states that up to 2 of 5 readers did not meet statistical specificity criteria for primary outcomes, largely from overcalling small noncontiguous temporal lobe activity, and that read errors may relate to imprecise cerebellar reference region drawing; subcortical [18F]flortaucipir retention appeared to represent off-target binding of unknown source.
- The paper states that larger sample sizes are needed to confirm high specificity for distinguishing AD from non-AD tau pathologies.
- Evident from the text: the primary cohort lacked structural imaging and used PET-to-PET registration; the full autopsy data set combined primary, test-case, and historically collected supplemental cases, and cognitively normal participants could remain eligible for autopsy regardless of time from scan to autopsy, which may introduce heterogeneity.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 75 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Flortaucipir PET imaging demonstrated statistically significant sensitivity and specificity for detecting an NFT score of B3, as determined by the interpretations of at least 3 of the 5 physician readers.
“The A16 primary cohort analysis of 64 patients met prespecified success criteria, with flortaucipir PET imaging demonstrating statistically significant sensitivity and specificity for detecting both NFT score of B3 and high level of ADNC, as determined by the interpretations of at least 3 of the 5 physican readers of the PET scans (Table 2; Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Tau pathology does not change substantially between antemortem flortaucipir positron emission tomography imaging and postmortem assessment.
- Findingown data
Among the 156 enrolled participants, 14 (9%) experienced at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event.
“Among the 156 enrolled participants, 14 (9%) experienced at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (eTable 2 in the Supplement).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The A16 primary cohort analysis of 64 patients met prespecified success criteria.
“The A16 primary cohort analysis of 64 patients met prespecified success criteria, with flortaucipir PET imaging demonstrating statistically significant sensitivity and specificity for detecting both NFT score of B3 and high level of ADNC, as determined by the interpretations of at least 3 of the 5 physican readers of the PET scans (Table 2; Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Tau pathology does not change substantially between antemortem flortaucipir positron emission tomography imaging and postmortem assessment.
- Findingown data
Flortaucipir PET imaging demonstrated statistically significant sensitivity and specificity for detecting a high level of Alzheimer disease neuropathologic change, as determined by the interpretations of at least 3 of the 5 physician readers.
“The A16 primary cohort analysis of 64 patients met prespecified success criteria, with flortaucipir PET imaging demonstrating statistically significant sensitivity and specificity for detecting both NFT score of B3 and high level of ADNC, as determined by the interpretations of at least 3 of the 5 physican readers of the PET scans (Table 2; Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Tau pathology does not change substantially between antemortem flortaucipir positron emission tomography imaging and postmortem assessment.
- Findingown data
In the FR01 study (n=82), Fleiss κ was 0.82 (P<.001).
“In the FR01 study (n = 82), the Fleiss κ value was 0.82 (P < .001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Of the 26 impaired participants with a non-AD clinical diagnosis, 19 had less than high levels of ADNC at autopsy.
“Of these, 19 had less than high levels of ADNC at autopsy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The majority read analysis for the A16 primary cohort showed high ADNC level sensitivity of 94.7% (95% CI, 82.7%-98.5%) and specificity of 80.8% (95% CI, 62.1%-91.5%).
“The majority read analysis for the A16 primary cohort showed similar results for B3 level sensitivity (92.3%; 95% CI, 79.7%-97.3%) and specificity (80.0%; 95% CI, 60.9%-91.1%), and for high ADNC level sensitivity (94.7%; 95% CI, 82.7%-98.5%) and specificity (80.8%; 95% CI, 62.1%-91.5%) (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Tau pathology does not change substantially between antemortem flortaucipir positron emission tomography imaging and postmortem assessment.
- Findingown data
Only 2 of the B3 cases with moderate to frequent CERAD scores had normal cognition.
“Only 2 of these cases with an NFT score of B3 and moderate to frequent CERAD scores had normal cognition”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the full autopsy data set, 46 (56%) cases were classified as having an NFT score of B3.
“Specifically, 46 (56%) of the full autopsy data set cases were classified as having an NFT score of B3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Similar sensitivity and specificity results were seen for the majority read analyses in FR01.
“Similar sensitivity and specificity results were seen for the majority read analyses (eTable 3 in the Supplement).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
3 of those 8 B2 amyloid-negative cases had normal cognition.
“and 3 of those 8 had normal cognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Of the 46 B3 cases, 42 (91%) had amyloid neuritic plaque with moderate or frequent CERAD scores.
“and 42 (91%) of these cases had amyloid neuritic plaque with moderate or frequent CERAD scores.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Of the 46 cases with an AD pattern on flortaucipir scan (majority 3 of 5 readers), 43 (94%) had amyloid plaque with moderate to frequent CERAD scores.
“Of the 46 cases with an AD pattern on flortaucipir scan (by majority 3 of 5 readers), 43 (94%) had amyloid plaque with moderate to frequent CERAD scores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Interrater reliability was high in both the A16 primary cohort and FR01 validation studies.
“Interrater reliability in both the A16 primary cohort and FR01 validation studies was high.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“A high degree of interrater reliability was observed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
8 of 23 (35%) cases with B2 NFT scores were amyloid negative (CERAD none-sparse score).
“8 of 23 (35%) of cases with B2 NFT scores were amyloid negative (CERAD none-sparse score)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Receiver operator curve assessment established an optimal SUVR cut point greater than 1.113 for defining a positive scan.
“Receiver operator curve assessment established an optimal SUVR cut point greater than 1.113 for defining a positive scan.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the full autopsy data set, there were 26 impaired participants with a non-AD clinical diagnosis.
“In the full autopsy data set, there were 26 impaired participants with a non-AD clinical diagnosis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In 16 of the 19 participants with non-AD clinical diagnosis and less than high ADNC, flortaucipir PET images were accurately interpreted as not consistent with an AD pattern.
“In 16 of these 19 participants, the flortaucipir PET images were accurately interpreted as not being consistent with an AD pattern (eTable 1 in the Supplement).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“In the full autopsy data set presented herein, 16 of 19 cases with less than high levels of ADNC at autopsy had flortaucipir PET images interpreted as not consistent with an AD pattern.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
Pathological cases covered a full range of tau pathology from Braak stages I to VI NFTs.
“Pathological cases covered a full range of tau pathology from Braak stages I to VI NFTs (Figure 2, Figure 3, and eFigure 3 in the Supplement).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In this study, the presence of high levels of AD-type NFTs, as assessed by an AD pattern on flortaucipir PET, was accompanied by a probability of moderate to frequent neuritic plaque present at autopsy.
“In this study, the presence of high levels of AD-type NFTs, as assessed by an AD pattern on a PET scan with [18F]flortaucipir, was accompanied by a probability of moderate to frequent neuritic plaque present at autopsy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Administration of flortaucipir F18 was safe with relatively few adverse effects among patients enrolled in the A16 study, many of which were common events among older adults, people with dementia, and people with terminal illness.
“Administration of flortaucipir F18 was safe with relatively few adverse effects among patients enrolled in the A16 study, many of which were common events among older adults, people with dementia, and people with terminal illness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Exploratory analysis using quantitation to identify positive or negative flortaucipir PET scans similarly resulted in high accuracy of detecting the standard for both NFTs and NIA-AA neuropathological AD diagnosis.
“Exploratory analysis using quantitation to identify positive or negative flortaucipir PET scans similarly resulted in the high accuracy of detecting the standard for both NFTs and NIA–AA neuropathological AD diagnosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Up to 2 of the 5 readers did not meet the statistical accuracy criteria for specificity for the primary outcomes of the A16 primary outcome and FR01 validation studies.
“In addition, up to 2 of the 5 readers did not meet the statistical accuracy criteria for specificity for the primary outcomes of the A16 primary outcome and FR01 validation studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Visual interpretations of PET scans used in this study showed the best accuracy for detecting the most advanced stages of NFT tau load and distribution as well as ADNC.
“In addition, the visual interpretations of PET scans used in this study showed the best accuracy for detecting the most advanced stages of NFT tau load and distribution as well as ADNC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Compared with cortical amyloid-β plaque, the density and distribution of phosphorylated tau aggregated in neurofibrillary tangles correlate more closely with Alzheimer disease-associated cognitive impairment and neurodegeneration.
“Compared with cortical Aβ plaque, the density and distribution of phosphorylated tau aggregated in NFTs correlate more closely with AD-associated cognitive impairment and neurodegeneration.12,13,14”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [12] Dickson TC, Saunders HL, Vickers JC. Relationship between apolipoprotein E and the amyloid deposits and dystrophic neurites of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1997; 23(6): 483- 491. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.1997.tb01325.x 9460714 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [13] Duyckaerts C, Brion JP, Hauw JJ, Flament-Durand J. Quantitative assessment of the density of neurofibrillary tangles and senile plaques in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Comparison of immunocytochemistry with a specific antibody and Bodian’s protargol method. Acta Neuropathol. 1987; 73(2): 167- 170. doi: 10.1007/BF00693783 2440224 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Nelson PT, Alafuzoff I, Bigio EH,. Correlation of Alzheimer disease neuropathologic changes with cognitive status: a review of the literature. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2012; 71(5): 362- 381. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31825018f7 22487856 PMC3560290 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Flortaucipir is being developed as a positron emission tomography tracer for detection of the aggregated tau of Alzheimer disease.
“Flortaucipir is being developed as a PET tracer for detection of the aggregated tau of AD.19,21,22,23,24”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [19] Chien DT, Bahri S, Szardenings AK,. Early clinical PET imaging results with the novel PHF-tau radioligand [F-18]-T807. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013; 34(2): 457- 468. doi: 10.3233/JAD-122059 23234879 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Pontecorvo MJ, Fleisher AS, Devous MD,. Baseline tau accumulation, as evidenced by visual interpretation of flortaucipir PET, and longitudinal cognitive change in three trials with MCI and AD dementia subjects. Paper presented at: 14th International Conference on Alzheimer’s & Parkinson’s Diseases; March 27, 2019; Lisbon, Portugal.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [22] Southekal S, Devous MD Sr, Kennedy I,. Flortaucipir F 18 quantitation using parametric estimation of reference signal intensity. J Nucl Med. 2018; 59(6): 944- 951. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.200006 29191858 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Pontecorvo MJ, Devous MD Sr, Navitsky M,; 18F-AV-1451-A05 investigators. Relationships between flortaucipir PET tau binding and amyloid burden, clinical diagnosis, age and cognition. Brain. 2017; 140(3): 748- 763. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww334 28077397 PMC5382945 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Devous MD Sr, Joshi AD, Navitsky M,. Test-retest reproducibility for the tau PET imaging agent flortaucipir F 18. J Nucl Med. 2018; 59(6): 937- 943. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.200691 29284675 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Positron emission tomography ligands have been shown to provide a minimally invasive estimate of the neuropathological features of Alzheimer disease, such as amyloid-β neuritic plaque deposition.
“Positron emission tomography (PET) ligands have been shown to provide a minimally invasive estimate of the neuropathological features of AD, such as Aβ neuritic plaque deposition.15,16,17,18”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [15] Wong DF, Rosenberg PB, Zhou Y,. In vivo imaging of amyloid deposition in Alzheimer disease using the radioligand 18F-AV-45 (florbetapir [corrected] F 18). J Nucl Med. 2010; 51(6): 913- 920. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.069088 20501908 PMC3101877 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Clark CM, Pontecorvo MJ, Beach TG,; AV-45-A16 Study Group. Cerebral PET with florbetapir compared with neuropathology at autopsy for detection of neuritic amyloid-β plaques: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2012; 11(8): 669- 678. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70142-4 22749065 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Curtis C, Gamez JE, Singh U,. Phase 3 trial of flutemetamol labeled with radioactive fluorine 18 imaging and neuritic plaque density. JAMA Neurol. 2015; 72(3): 287- 294. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4144 25622185 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Sabri O, Sabbagh MN, Seibyl J,; Florbetaben Phase 3 Study Group. Florbetaben PET imaging to detect amyloid beta plaques in Alzheimer’s disease: phase 3 study. Alzheimers Dement. 2015; 11(8): 964- 974. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.02.004 25824567 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Imaging biomarkers for cortical tau have become available.
“Imaging biomarkers for cortical tau have become available.19,20”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [19] Chien DT, Bahri S, Szardenings AK,. Early clinical PET imaging results with the novel PHF-tau radioligand [F-18]-T807. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013; 34(2): 457- 468. doi: 10.3233/JAD-122059 23234879 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Xia CF, Arteaga J, Chen G,. [(18)F]T807, a novel tau positron emission tomography imaging agent for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2013; 9(6): 666- 676. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.008 23411393 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Comparison of tracer binding to aggregated protein in autopsy material is one method of validating a novel positron emission tomography agent.
“Comparison of tracer binding to aggregated protein in autopsy material is one method of validating a novel PET agent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
NFT levels below B3 are not as strongly associated with cognitive impairment or moderate to frequent neuritic amyloid plaque burden.
“The NFT levels below B3 are not as strongly associated with cognitive impairment or moderate to frequent neuritic amyloid plaque burden.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [6] Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K,; Contributors. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018; 14(4): 535- 562. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 29653606 PMC5958625 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [48] Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Wilson RS, Bienias JL, Arnold SE. Neurofibrillary tangles mediate the association of amyloid load with clinical Alzheimer disease and level of cognitive function. Arch Neurol. 2004; 61(3): 378- 384. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.3.378 15023815 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [49] Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Bienias JL, Evans DA, Wilson RS. Mild cognitive impairment is related to Alzheimer disease pathology and cerebral infarctions. Neurology. 2005; 64(5): 834- 841. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000152982.47274.9E 15753419 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Including mesial temporal regions in a diagnostic criterion for an AD pattern on flortaucipir PET may reduce the specificity of AD neuropathological diagnosis.
“Therefore, including these regions in a diagnostic criterion for an AD pattern on flortaucipir PET images may reduce the specificity of AD neuropathological diagnosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These results were confirmed by a second set of independent physician readers in the FR01 validation study.
“These results were confirmed by a second set of independent physician readers of the PET scans in the FR01 validation study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These findings support the potential for flortaucipir PET to assist in the diagnosis of AD as defined by the NIA-AA research framework.
“These findings support the potential for PET imaging with [18F]flortaucipir to assist in the diagnosis of AD as defined by the NIA–AA research framework.6”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K,; Contributors. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018; 14(4): 535- 562. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 29653606 PMC5958625 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Isolated tau in mesial temporal regions can represent B1-level NFTs, which are associated with not or low levels of ADNC.
“Furthermore, although these areas are key in early NFT accumulation in AD, isolated tau in these regions can represent B1-level NFTs, which are associated with not or low levels of ADNC.5”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Hyman BT, Phelps CH, Beach TG,. National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2012; 8(1): 1- 13. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.007 22265587 PMC3266529 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
These results are consistent with previously observed correspondence between elevated flortaucipir PET signal and elevated signal on amyloid PET.
“These results are consistent with previously observed correspondence between elevated flortaucipir PET signal and elevated signal on amyloid PET.23,45”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [23] Pontecorvo MJ, Devous MD Sr, Navitsky M,; 18F-AV-1451-A05 investigators. Relationships between flortaucipir PET tau binding and amyloid burden, clinical diagnosis, age and cognition. Brain. 2017; 140(3): 748- 763. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww334 28077397 PMC5382945 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [45] Johnson KA, Schultz A, Betensky RA,. Tau positron emission tomographic imaging in aging and early Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2016; 79(1): 110- 119. doi: 10.1002/ana.24546 26505746 PMC4738026 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
For visual reads of PET scans, mesial temporal regions can be challenging to interpret owing to potential bleed-in from off-target binding in the choroid plexus and atrophy-associated partial-volume effects.
“For visual reads of PET scans, the mesial temporal regions can be challenging to interpret owing to the potential bleed-in from off-target binding in the choroid plexus and atrophy-associated partial-volume effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Mesial temporal lobe NFTs in the absence of substantial Aβ or neuritic plaque can occur in older individuals without cognitive impairment, those with mild impairment, or those with cognitive impairment associated with other causes than AD.
“In addition, mesial temporal lobe NFTs in the absence of substantial Aβ or neuritic plaque can occur in older individuals without cognitive impairment, those with mild impairment, or those with cognitive impairment associated with other causes than AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [46] Nelson PT, Abner EL, Schmitt FA,. Brains with medial temporal lobe neurofibrillary tangles but no neuritic amyloid plaques are a diagnostic dilemma but may have pathogenetic aspects distinct from Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2009; 68(7): 774- 784. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181aacbe9 19535994 PMC2725359 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [47] Jellinger KA, Alafuzoff I, Attems J,. PART, a distinct tauopathy, different from classical sporadic Alzheimer disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2015; 129(5): 757- 762. doi: 10.1007/s00401-015-1407-2 25778618 PMC4534004 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Approximately 20% (19%-23%) of participants with positive amyloid PET scans have no or low levels of flortaucipir binding by quantitative or visual interpretation.
“Similarly, approximately 20% (19%-23%) of participants with positive amyloid PET scans have no or low levels of [18F]flortaucipir binding by quantitative or visual interpretation.21,23,50,51,52”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [21] Pontecorvo MJ, Fleisher AS, Devous MD,. Baseline tau accumulation, as evidenced by visual interpretation of flortaucipir PET, and longitudinal cognitive change in three trials with MCI and AD dementia subjects. Paper presented at: 14th International Conference on Alzheimer’s & Parkinson’s Diseases; March 27, 2019; Lisbon, Portugal.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [23] Pontecorvo MJ, Devous MD Sr, Navitsky M,; 18F-AV-1451-A05 investigators. Relationships between flortaucipir PET tau binding and amyloid burden, clinical diagnosis, age and cognition. Brain. 2017; 140(3): 748- 763. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww334 28077397 PMC5382945 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [50] Ossenkoppele R, Rabinovici GD, Smith R,. Discriminative accuracy of [18F]flortaucipir positron emission tomography for Alzheimer disease vs other neurodegenerative disorders. JAMA. 2018; 320(11): 1151- 1162. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12917 30326496 PMC6233630 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
A pattern not consistent with AD on flortaucipir PET would not rule out the presence of AD-associated amyloid pathology or lower levels of NFT pathology.
“However, a pattern not consistent with AD on flortaucipir PET scan (which may include isolated uptake in the mesial, anterior lateral temporal, or frontal lobes) would not rule out the presence of AD-associated amyloid pathology or lower levels of NFT pathology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
An AD pattern on flortaucipir PET, as defined here, and the presence of B3-level NFTs is associated with the presence of both key AD pathologies.
“As such, an AD pattern on a flortaucipir PET scan, as defined here, and the presence of B3-level NFTs is associated with the presence of both key AD pathologies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Together, these results suggest the potential use of quantitative analysis to support visual read interpretation of flortaucipir F18 scan images.
“Together, these results suggest the potential use of quantitative analysis to support visual read interpretation of flortaucipir F18 scan images.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Flortaucipir appears to bind poorly to non-AD tau pathologies such as those seen in frontotemporal dementias, progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, and chronic traumatic encephalopathy.
“[18F]flortaucipir appears to bind poorly to non-AD tau pathologies such as those seen in frontotemporal dementias, progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, and chronic traumatic encephalopathy.27,30,32,50,56,57”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [27] Marquié M, Normandin MD, Meltzer AC,. Pathological correlations of [F-18]-AV-1451 imaging in non-Alzheimer tauopathies. Ann Neurol. 2017; 81(1): 117- 128. doi: 10.1002/ana.24844 27997036 PMC5319193 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [30] Smith R, Puschmann A, Schöll M,. 18F-AV-1451 tau PET imaging correlates strongly with tau neuropathology in MAPT mutation carriers. Brain. 2016; 139(pt 9): 2372- 2379. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww163 27357347 PMC4995360 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [32] Day GS, Gordon BA, Perrin RJ,. In vivo [18F]-AV-1451 tau-PET imaging in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neurology. 2018; 90(10): e896- e906. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005064 29438042 PMC5863493 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A recent study of 26 cases comparing flortaucipir PET image and autopsy findings demonstrated sensitivity 87% and specificity 82% for identifying AD-spectrum pathological diagnoses, using quantitative analysis of a mesial, inferior, or middle temporal lobe region of interest.
“In support of this finding and the quantitative data presented herein, a recent study of 26 cases comparing flortaucipir PET image and autopsy findings demonstrated a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 82% for identifying AD-spectrum pathological diagnoses, using quantitative analysis of a mesial, inferior, or middle temporal lobe region of interest.25”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Lowe VJ, Lundt ES, Albertson SM,. Tau-positron emission tomography correlates with neuropathology findings. Alzheimers Dement. 2020; 16(3): 561- 571. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.09.079 31784374 PMC7067654 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Previously published report of 3 test cases in the A16 study demonstrated regional relationships between quantitative flortaucipir PET signal and neocortical phosphorylated paired helical filament tau concentrations (Pearson r=0.81; P<.001).
“Our previously published report of the 3 test cases in the A16 study demonstrated regional relationships between quantitative flortaucipir PET signal and neocortical phosphorylated paired helical filament tau concentrations (Pearson r = 0.81; P < .001).53”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] Siderowf AD, Keene CD, Beach TG,. Comparison of regional flortaucipir PET to quantitative tau and amyloid immunoassay in patients with Alzheimer’s disease pathology: a pilot clinico-pathological study. Alzheimers Dement. 2017; 13(7): 776. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.1038 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Twelve of these autopsy-confirmed cases had pathological evidence of Braak stages IV to VI NFTs (2 cases with Braak stage IV) with moderate to frequent neuritic plaques and were above the SUVR threshold for positivity for the flortaucipir temporal lobe region of interest.
“Twelve of these autopsy-confirmed cases had pathological evidence of Braak stages IV to VI NFTs (2 cases with Braak stage IV) with moderate to frequent neuritic plaques and were above the SUVR threshold for positivity for the [18F]flortaucipir temporal lobe region of interest.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Lowe VJ, Lundt ES, Albertson SM,. Tau-positron emission tomography correlates with neuropathology findings. Alzheimers Dement. 2020; 16(3): 561- 571. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.09.079 31784374 PMC7067654 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A multinational flortaucipir F18 imaging study that evaluated 719 participants with clinical diagnoses of AD dementia, non-AD neurodegenerative disorders, and mild cognitive impairment as well as controls with normal cognition demonstrated a high level of discriminative accuracy of flortaucipir for AD compared with other neurocognitive disorders.
“A multinational flortaucipir F18 imaging study that evaluated 719 participants with clinical diagnoses of AD dementia, non-AD neurodegenerative disorders, and mild cognitive impairment as well as controls with normal cognition demonstrated a high level of discriminative accuracy of [18F]flortaucipir for AD compared with other neurocognitive disorders.50”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Ossenkoppele R, Rabinovici GD, Smith R,. Discriminative accuracy of [18F]flortaucipir positron emission tomography for Alzheimer disease vs other neurodegenerative disorders. JAMA. 2018; 320(11): 1151- 1162. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12917 30326496 PMC6233630 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
These non-AD clinical diagnosis cases support the high specificity of flortaucipir PET for distinguishing AD from non-AD tau pathologies.
“Overall, these non-AD clinical diagnosis cases support the high specificity of PET imaging with [18F]flortaucipir for distinguishing AD from non-AD tau pathologies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This finding was largely associated with overcalling small, noncontiguous foci of activity in the temporal lobes, resulting in a false-positive AD pattern read.
“This finding was largely associated with overcalling small, noncontiguous foci of activity in the temporal lobes, resulting in a false-positive AD pattern read.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Results of this study support the hypothesis that, with high sensitivity and moderate to high specificity, flortaucipir PET is able to identify the underlying presence of NFTs at the B3 level and a high level of ADNC per the NIA-AA criteria, consistent with a neuropathological diagnosis of AD.
“Results of this study support the hypothesis that, with a high sensitivity and moderate to high specificity, PET imaging with [18F]flortaucipir is able to identify the underlying presence of NFTs at the B3 level and a high level of ADNC per the NIA–AA criteria, consistent with a neuropathological diagnosis of AD.5”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Hyman BT, Phelps CH, Beach TG,. National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2012; 8(1): 1- 13. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.007 22265587 PMC3266529 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
In appropriate clinical cases of adults who have undergone adequate neurological assessment and have been evaluated for AD or other causes of cognitive decline, flortaucipir PET may help in establishing a diagnosis of AD.
“In appropriate clinical cases of adults who have undergone adequate neurological assessment and have been evaluated for AD or other causes of cognitive decline, PET imaging with [18F]flortaucipir may help in establishing a diagnosis of AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
- May combine two claims. 32
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter removal of the 3 test cases, the remaining 64 participants were included in the A16 primary cohort, with autopsy occurring a mean (SD) 16.2 (15.0) hours from the recorded time of death and 2.6 (2.14) months after [18F]flortaucipir imaging.
“After removal of the 3 test cases, the remaining 64 participants were included in the A16 primary cohort, with autopsy occurring a mean (SD) 16.2 (15.0) hours from the recorded time of death and 2.6 (2.14) months after [18F]flortaucipir imaging.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBefore study completion, 73 participants died within 9 months of imaging, of whom 67 (92%) had a valid study autopsy.
“Before study completion, 73 participants died within 9 months of imaging, of whom 67 (92%) had a valid study autopsy (eFigure 2 in the Supplement).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe majority read analysis for the A16 primary cohort showed B3 level sensitivity of 92.3% (95% CI, 79.7%-97.3%) and specificity of 80.0% (95% CI, 60.9%-91.1%).
“The majority read analysis for the A16 primary cohort showed similar results for B3 level sensitivity (92.3%; 95% CI, 79.7%-97.3%) and specificity (80.0%; 95% CI, 60.9%-91.1%), and for high ADNC level sensitivity (94.7%; 95% CI, 82.7%-98.5%) and specificity (80.8%; 95% CI, 62.1%-91.5%) (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Tau pathology does not change substantially between antemortem flortaucipir positron emission tomography imaging and postmortem assessment.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA total of 156 participants were enrolled, underwent flortaucipir imaging, and were included in a safety assessment.
“A total of 156 participants were enrolled in this diagnostic study, underwent flortaucipir imaging, and were included in a safety assessment (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThree participants (2%) experienced serious adverse events within 48 hours of the flortaucipir scan: death from acute kidney failure, death from malignant neoplasm, and nonfatal myocardial infarction during hemodialysis.
“Three participants (2%) experienced serious adverse events within 48 hours of the flortaucipir scan: death from acute kidney failure, death from malignant neoplasm, and nonfatal myocardial infarction during hemodialysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor the B3 level, sensitivity ranged from 92.3% (95% CI, 79.7%-97.3%) to 100.0% (95% CI, 91.0%-100.0%), and specificity ranged from 52.0% (95% CI, 33.5%-70.0%) to 92.0% (95% CI, 75.0%-97.8%).
“For the B3 level, sensitivity ranged from 92.3% (95% CI, 79.7%-97.3%) to 100.0% (95% CI, 91.0%-100.0%), and specificity ranged from 52.0% (95% CI, 33.5%-70.0%) to 92.0% (95% CI, 75.0%-97.8%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Tau pathology does not change substantially between antemortem flortaucipir positron emission tomography imaging and postmortem assessment.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAgitation (n=3) and headache (n=2) were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events.
“Agitation (n = 3) and headache (n = 2) were the most common of these events.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the 64 primary cohort patients, 49 (77%) had dementia, 1 (2%) had mild cognitive impairment, and 14 (22%) had normal cognition.
“Of the 64 primary cohort patients, 49 (77%) had dementia, 1 (2%) had mild cognitive impairment, and 14 (22%) had normal cognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the 49 patients with dementia, 33 had a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease and 16 had a non-Alzheimer disease clinical diagnosis at baseline.
“Of the 49 patients with dementia, 33 had a clinical diagnosis of AD based on medical history and 16 had non-AD clinical diagnosis at baseline (eTable 1 in the Supplement).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor the high ADNC level, sensitivity was 94.7% (95% CI, 82.7%-98.5%) to 100.0% (95% CI, 90.8%-100.0%) and specificity was 50.0% (95% CI, 32.1%-67.9%) to 92.3% (95% CI, 75.9%-97.9%).
“For the high ADNC level, sensitivity was 94.7% (95% CI, 82.7%-98.5%) to 100.0% (95% CI, 90.8%-100.0%) and specificity was 50.0% (95% CI, 32.1%-67.9%) to 92.3% (95% CI, 75.9%-97.9%) (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Tau pathology does not change substantially between antemortem flortaucipir positron emission tomography imaging and postmortem assessment.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth death events were reported by the investigator as severe adverse events that were not associated with the study drug or procedure.
“Both death events were reported by the investigator as severe adverse events that were not associated with the study drug or procedure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor quantitative analysis, 60 (90%) of 67 scans (primary cohort plus test cases) met scan quality criteria for SUVR calculation; 6 scans (9%) had severe inter- and within-frame motion, and 1 scan (2%) was acquired outside the allowable postinjection acquisition time window.
“For quantitative analysis, 60 (90%) of 67 scans (primary cohort plus test cases) met the scan quality criteria for SUVR calculation; 6 scans (9%) had severe inter- and within-frame motion, and 1 scan (2%) was acquired outside of the allowable postinjection acquisition time window.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the full autopsy data set, success criteria were met for high level of ADNC, with sensitivity ranging from 95.1% to 97.6% and specificity ranging from 65.9% to 90.2%.
“Success criteria were also met for high level of ADNC with sensitivity ranging from 95.1% (95% CI, 83.9%-98.7%) to 97.6% (95% CI 87.4%-99.6%) and specificity ranging from 65.9% (95% CI, 50.5%-78.4%) to 90.2% (95% CI, 77.5%-96.1%) (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe FR01 validation study met prespecified success criteria for both the FR01 primary cohort (n=64) and full autopsy data set (n=82), demonstrating statistically significant sensitivity and specificity (95% CI lower limits >50%) of flortaucipir PET for detecting B3 NFT and high ADNC by at least 3 of 5 readers.
“The FR01 validation study also met the prespecified success criteria for both the FR01 primary cohort (n = 64) and full autopsy data set (n = 82) analyses, demonstrating statistically significant sensitivity and specificity (above 95% CI lower limits >50%) of flortaucipir PET imaging for detecting both the NFT score of B3 NFT and high ADNC level by at least 3 of the 5 readers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the A16 full autopsy data set majority read analysis, B3 level sensitivity was 89.1% and specificity 86.1%; high ADNC level sensitivity 95.1% and specificity 82.9%.
“The majority read analysis for the A16 full autopsy data set showed similar results for B3 level sensitivity (89.1%; 95% CI, 77.0%-95.3%) and specificity (86.1%; 95% CI, 71.3%-93.9%), and for high ADNC level sensitivity (95.1%; 95% CI, 83.9%-98.7%) and specificity (82.9%; 95% CI, 68.7%-91.5%) (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor the A16 study, all read scans (n=105) showed 89.9% agreement (Fleiss κ=0.80; P<.001); primary cohort scans (n=64) showed 88.4% agreement (Fleiss κ=0.74; P<.001).
“For the A16 study, all read scans (n = 105 of enrolled patients) showed 89.9% agreement (Fleiss κ, 0.80; P < .001); the primary cohort scans (n = 64) showed 88.4% agreement (Fleiss κ, 0.74; P < .001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the full autopsy data set (n = 82), all 5 readers met success criteria (lower confidence limits of sensitivity and specificity >50%) for detecting NFT score B3, with sensitivity ranging from 89.1% to 93.5% and specificity ranging from 66.7% to 94.4%.
“For the full autopsy data set (n = 82), all 5 readers met success criteria with lower confidence limits of sensitivity and specificity greater than 50% for the NFT score of B3 with sensitivity ranging from 89.1% (95% CI, 77.0%-95.3%) to 93.5% (95% CI, 82.5%-97.8%) and specificity ranging from 66.7% (95% CI, 50.3%-79.8%) to 94.4% (95% CI, 81.9%-98.5%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe quantitative cut point >1.113 yielded sensitivity 84.2% for NFT score B3 and 86.5% for high ADNC, with 100% specificity for both autopsy measures.
“This quantitative cut point yielded a sensitivity of 84.2% for an NFT score of B3 and 86.5% for a high level of ADNC, with 100% specificity for both autopsy measures (eFigure 3 in the Supplement).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAlthough flortaucipir retention in the neocortex appeared to match the distribution of aggregated tau in AD at autopsy, flortaucipir retention in subcortical structures also appeared to represent off-target binding.
“Although [18F]flortaucipir retention in the neocortex appeared to match the distribution of aggregated tau in AD at autopsy, [18F]flortaucipir retention in subcortical structures also appeared to represent off-target binding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNeuropathological criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease were established by the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer Association and were updated in 2012.
“Neuropathological criteria for the diagnosis of AD were established by the National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer Association (NIA–AA)4 and were updated in 2012 to reflect the current thinking on AD pathological assessment.5,6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [4] Hyman BT. The neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: clinical-pathological studies. Neurobiol Aging. 1997; 18(4)(suppl): S27- S32. doi: 10.1016/S0197-4580(97)00066-3 9330982
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Hyman BT, Phelps CH, Beach TG,. National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2012; 8(1): 1- 13. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.007 22265587 PMC3266529 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [6] Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K,; Contributors. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018; 14(4): 535- 562. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 29653606 PMC5958625 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPathological accumulation of aggregated hyperphosphorylated tau protein in neurons and glia underlies a wide range of neurodegenerative disorders.
“Pathological accumulation of aggregated hyperphosphorylated tau protein in neurons and glia underlies a wide range of neurodegenerative disorders.11”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Querfurth HW, LaFerla FM. Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(4): 329- 344. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0909142 20107219 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAlzheimer disease is now commonly accepted as a clinicopathological entity that can be diagnosed without histopathological examination, in the presence of appropriate biomarker evidence of an underlying condition.
“With the advent of biomarkers that enable in vivo identification of underlying AD pathological conditions, and the acceptance that AD begins years before the emergence of cognitive impairment, AD is now commonly accepted as a clinicopathological entity7,8 that can be diagnosed without histopathological examination, in the presence of appropriate biomarker evidence of an underlying condition.6,8,9”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [7] Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C,. Revising the definition of Alzheimer’s disease: a new lexicon. Lancet Neurol. 2010; 9(11): 1118- 1127. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70223-4 20934914
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H,. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7(3): 263- 269. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 21514250 PMC3312024 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [6] Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K,; Contributors. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018; 14(4): 535- 562. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 29653606 PMC5958625 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Knopman DS, Petersen RC, Jack CR Jr. A brief history of “Alzheimer disease”: multiple meanings separated by a common name. Neurology. 2019; 92(22): 1053- 1059. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007583 31028129 PMC6556090
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTau is an intracellular protein that binds to and stabilizes axonal microtubules in neurons, thereby regulating intracellular transport.
“Tau is an intracellular protein that binds to and stabilizes axonal microtubules in neurons, thereby regulating intracellular transport.10”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Avila J, Lucas JJ, Perez M, Hernandez F. Role of tau protein in both physiological and pathological conditions. Physiol Rev. 2004; 84(2): 361- 384. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00024.2003 15044677
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlzheimer disease is characterized by aggregated tau-containing neurofibrillary tangles and by amyloid plaque composed largely of aggregated amyloid-β fragments.
“Alzheimer disease (AD) is characterized by aggregated tau–containing neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs)1 and by amyloid plaque composed largely of aggregated amyloid-β (Aβ) fragments.2,3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [1] Goedert M, Jakes R. Mutations causing neurodegenerative tauopathies. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005; 1739(2-3): 240- 250. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2004.08.007 15615642
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] Kidd M. Paired helical filaments in electron microscopy of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 1963; 197: 192- 193. doi: 10.1038/197192b0 14032480
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [3] Masters CL, Multhaup G, Simms G, Pottgiesser J, Martins RN, Beyreuther K. Neuronal origin of a cerebral amyloid: neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer’s disease contain the same protein as the amyloid of plaque cores and blood vessels. EMBO J. 1985; 4(11): 2757- 2763. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb04000.x 4065091 PMC554575
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationLarge autopsy studies have demonstrated a high sensitivity and specificity for amyloid positron emission tomography to distinguish individuals with subsequent autopsy findings of no or sparse neuritic plaque from individuals with moderate to frequent plaque.
“For example, large autopsy studies have demonstrated a high sensitivity and specificity for amyloid PET to distinguish individuals with subsequent autopsy findings of no or sparse neuritic plaque from individuals with moderate to frequent plaque.16,17,18”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [16] Clark CM, Pontecorvo MJ, Beach TG,; AV-45-A16 Study Group. Cerebral PET with florbetapir compared with neuropathology at autopsy for detection of neuritic amyloid-β plaques: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2012; 11(8): 669- 678. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70142-4 22749065 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Curtis C, Gamez JE, Singh U,. Phase 3 trial of flutemetamol labeled with radioactive fluorine 18 imaging and neuritic plaque density. JAMA Neurol. 2015; 72(3): 287- 294. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4144 25622185 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Sabri O, Sabbagh MN, Seibyl J,; Florbetaben Phase 3 Study Group. Florbetaben PET imaging to detect amyloid beta plaques in Alzheimer’s disease: phase 3 study. Alzheimers Dement. 2015; 11(8): 964- 974. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.02.004 25824567 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataNeuropathological assessment was performed by 2 authors blinded to clinical and imaging results.
“Neuropathological assessment was performed by 2 authors (T.G.B. and T.J.M.) blinded to clinical and imaging results and using NIA–AA diagnostic scoring guidelines.5,40”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn vitro autoradiography studies of brain tissue from symptomatic patients with Alzheimer disease have found that [18F]flortaucipir signal correlates with the level of paired helical filament tau by immunohistochemistry and binds with a dissociation constant in the approximately 0.5 nM range.
“In vitro autoradiography studies of brain tissue from symptomatic patients with AD have found that [18F]flortaucipir signal correlates with the level of paired helical filament tau by immunohistochemistry and binds with a dissociation constant in the approximately 0.5 nM range.20”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Xia CF, Arteaga J, Chen G,. [(18)F]T807, a novel tau positron emission tomography imaging agent for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2013; 9(6): 666- 676. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.008 23411393
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationStudies comparing antemortem tau positron emission tomography imaging with autopsy have begun assessing the ability of flortaucipir to detect underlying neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer disease and non-Alzheimer disease dementias.
“Studies comparing antemortem tau PET imaging with autopsy have begun assessing the ability of flortaucipir to detect underlying NFTs in AD and non-AD dementias.25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 9 sources checked- cites [25] Lowe VJ, Lundt ES, Albertson SM,. Tau-positron emission tomography correlates with neuropathology findings. Alzheimers Dement. 2020; 16(3): 561- 571. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.09.079 31784374 PMC7067654 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] Josephs KA, Whitwell JL, Tacik P,. [18F]AV-1451 tau-PET uptake does correlate with quantitatively measured 4R-tau burden in autopsy-confirmed corticobasal degeneration. Acta Neuropathol. 2016; 132(6): 931- 933. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1618-1 27645292 PMC5107140 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Marquié M, Normandin MD, Meltzer AC,. Pathological correlations of [F-18]-AV-1451 imaging in non-Alzheimer tauopathies. Ann Neurol. 2017; 81(1): 117- 128. doi: 10.1002/ana.24844 27997036 PMC5319193 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [28] Marquié M, Verwer EE, Meltzer AC,. Lessons learned about [F-18]-AV-1451 off-target binding from an autopsy-confirmed Parkinson’s case. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2017; 5(1): 75. doi: 10.1186/s40478-017-0482-0 29047416 PMC5648451 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] McMillan CT, Irwin DJ, Nasrallah I,. Multimodal evaluation demonstrates in vivo 18F-AV-1451 uptake in autopsy-confirmed corticobasal degeneration. Acta Neuropathol. 2016; 132(6): 935- 937. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1640-3 27815633 PMC5154298 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [30] Smith R, Puschmann A, Schöll M,. 18F-AV-1451 tau PET imaging correlates strongly with tau neuropathology in MAPT mutation carriers. Brain. 2016; 139(pt 9): 2372- 2379. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww163 27357347 PMC4995360 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [31] Smith R, Schöll M, Honer M, Nilsson CF, Englund E, Hansson O. Tau neuropathology correlates with FDG-PET, but not AV-1451-PET, in progressive supranuclear palsy. Acta Neuropathol. 2017; 133(1): 149- 151. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1650-1 27900460 PMC5209394 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [32] Day GS, Gordon BA, Perrin RJ,. In vivo [18F]-AV-1451 tau-PET imaging in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neurology. 2018; 90(10): e896- e906. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005064 29438042 PMC5863493 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [33] Smith R, Wibom M, Pawlik D, Englund E, Hansson O. Correlation of in vivo [18F]flortaucipir with postmortem Alzheimer disease tau pathology. JAMA Neurol. 2019; 76(3): 310- 317. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3692 30508025 PMC6439731 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenFlortaucipir positron emission tomography scans were evaluated by 5 readers who were blinded to clinical and neuropathological results.
“The flortaucipir PET scans were evaluated by 5 readers who were blinded to clinical and neuropathological results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationNeuropathological assessment used National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer Association diagnostic scoring guidelines.
“Neuropathological assessment was performed by 2 authors (T.G.B. and T.J.M.) blinded to clinical and imaging results and using NIA–AA diagnostic scoring guidelines.5,40”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [5] Hyman BT, Phelps CH, Beach TG,. National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2012; 8(1): 1- 13. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.007 22265587 PMC3266529 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [40] Montine TJ, Phelps CH, Beach TG,; National Institute on Aging; Alzheimer’s Association. National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease: a practical approach. Acta Neuropathol. 2012; 123(1): 1- 11. doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0910-3 22101365 PMC3268003 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenFleiss κ statistics were calculated to assess overall interreader agreement.
“To assess overall interreader agreement, Fleiss κ statistics were calculated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataScans that were considered unevaluable by at least 3 of the 5 readers were not used in any analyses.
“Scans that were considered unevaluable (eg, head out of field of view, severe motion, acquisition start time offsets, and low counts) by at least 3 of the 5 readers were not used in any analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenSuccess was defined as having at least 3 of the 5 readers above the lower bounds of the 95% CI for both sensitivity and specificity of 50% or greater.
“Success was defined as having at least 3 of the 5 readers above the lower bounds of the 95% CI for both sensitivity and specificity of 50% or greater.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenIn the FR01 validation study, a second set of 5 nuclear medicine physicians or radiologists reinterpreted all available scan data.
“In a subsequent validation study (18F-AV-1415-FR01; NCT03901092), hereafter referred to as the FR01 validation study, a second set of 5 nuclear medicine physicians or radiologists reinterpreted all available scan data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe preplanned A16 primary cohort included all enrolled participants who had valid and evaluable flortaucipir images and who had an autopsy (n=64), and excluded the 3 test cases and 16 supplemental historically collected autopsy cases.
“The preplanned A16 primary cohort included all enrolled participants who had valid and evaluable flortaucipir images and who had an autopsy (n = 64), and excluded the 3 test cases and 16 supplemental historically collected autopsy cases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataA preplanned exploratory analysis was performed on the full autopsy data set (n=82).
“A preplanned exploratory analysis was performed on the full autopsy data set (n = 82), which included the 64 patients in the primary cohort, 2 evaluable autopsies from the 3 test cases, and the 16 supplemental autopsy cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenFive board-certified nuclear medicine physicians or radiologists independently visually rated flortaucipir positron emission tomography scans as either having or not having a pattern of flortaucipir retention consistent with Alzheimer disease.
“Five board-certified nuclear medicine physicians or radiologists (eAppendix in the Supplement) independently visually rated flortaucipir PET scans as either having or not having a pattern of flortaucipir retention consistent with AD (Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmyloid and tau pathologies may begin independently but are highly associated with each other in symptomatic stages of AD.
“Amyloid and tau pathologies may begin independently6,43 but are highly associated with each other in symptomatic stages of AD.44”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [6] Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K,; Contributors. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018; 14(4): 535- 562. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 29653606 PMC5958625 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [43] Mungas D, Tractenberg R, Schneider JA, Crane PK, Bennett DA. A 2-process model for neuropathology of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2014; 35(2): 301- 308. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.08.007 24080173 PMC3977862
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [44] Monsell SE, Mock C, Roe CM,. Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic persons with Alzheimer disease neuropathology. Neurology. 2013; 80(23): 2121- 2129. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318295d7a1 23645594 PMC3716351
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe primary study results were further strengthened in secondary exploratory analyses that included 16 supplemental autopsy cases, establishing high specificity for detecting AD tau.
“The primary study results were further strengthened in secondary exploratory analyses that included 16 supplemental autopsy cases, establishing a high specificity for detecting AD tau.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe A16 study demonstrated statistically significant sensitivity and specificity of flortaucipir PET for detecting tau neurofibrillary pathology (NFT score B3 corresponding to Braak stages V and VI) and high levels of ADNC neuropathologic changes (NIA-AA criteria).
“The A16 study demonstrated statistically significant sensitivity and specificity of PET imaging with [18F]flortaucipir for detecting tau neurofibrillary pathology (NFT score of B3 corresponding with Braak stages V and VI) and high levels of ADNC neuropathologic changes (according to NIA–AA criteria).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnalyses from the National Alzheimer Coordinating Center pathological database indicated that individuals with a B2 score had clinically normal result at a rate of 25.3% (34 of 134), and 41 (37.6%) of 109 people with Aβ at autopsy had a B2 score.
“Analyses from the National Alzheimer Coordinating Center pathological database have indicated that individuals with a B2 score had clinically normal result at a rate of 25.3% (34 of 134), and 41 (37.6%) of 109 people with Aβ at autopsy had a B2 score.5”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Hyman BT, Phelps CH, Beach TG,. National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2012; 8(1): 1- 13. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.007 22265587 PMC3266529 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough B3 score may predict substantial amyloid plaque, amyloid plaque is often present in the absence of B3-level NFTs, particularly in earlier stages of AD.
“Although the presence of B3 score may predict the presence of substantial amyloid plaque, amyloid plaque is often present in the absence of B3-level NFTs, particularly in earlier stages of AD.6,48,49”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [6] Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K,; Contributors. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018; 14(4): 535- 562. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 29653606 PMC5958625 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [48] Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Wilson RS, Bienias JL, Arnold SE. Neurofibrillary tangles mediate the association of amyloid load with clinical Alzheimer disease and level of cognitive function. Arch Neurol. 2004; 61(3): 378- 384. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.3.378 15023815 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [49] Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Bienias JL, Evans DA, Wilson RS. Mild cognitive impairment is related to Alzheimer disease pathology and cerebral infarctions. Neurology. 2005; 64(5): 834- 841. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000152982.47274.9E 15753419 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationFurther method improvements, including quantitative analysis of mesial temporal structures, may alter the sensitivity of flortaucipir to detect earlier pathological stages of NFTs.
“Further method improvements, including quantitative analysis of mesial temporal structures,25,54,55 may alter the sensitivity of [18F]flortaucipir to detect earlier pathological stages of NFTs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [25] Lowe VJ, Lundt ES, Albertson SM,. Tau-positron emission tomography correlates with neuropathology findings. Alzheimers Dement. 2020; 16(3): 561- 571. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.09.079 31784374 PMC7067654
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [54] Southekal S, Kotari V, Devous MD Sr,. Temporal lobe quantitation of flortaucipir PET images may improve detection of intermediate neurofibrillary tangle pathology in autopsy-validated cases. Alzheimers Dement. 2019; 15(7): P1486- P1487. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.08.008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [55] Kotari V, Navitsky M, Southekal S,. Early tau detection and implications for disease progression. Alzheimers Dement. 2019; 15(7):P 1614- P1615. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.06.4839 PMC9972744 36855201
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThese cohort characteristics may have implications for the visual and quantitative interpretation of PET scans and for the associations with underlying pathological features.
“These characteristics may have implications for the visual and quantitative interpretation of PET scans and for the associations with underlying pathological features.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCortical flortaucipir PET signal in patients with non-AD dementias is generally lower than expected than that seen in typical patients with AD and, when present, tends to be greatest in anterior temporal lobes, frontal lobe and striatum/globus pallidus, and in some reports of white matter foci.
“Cortical [18F]flortaucipir PET signal in patients with non-AD dementias is generally lower than expected than that seen in typical patients with AD and, when present, tends to be greatest in anterior temporal lobes, frontal lobe and striatum/globus pallidus, and in some reports of white matter foci.27,28,30,31,32”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [27] Marquié M, Normandin MD, Meltzer AC,. Pathological correlations of [F-18]-AV-1451 imaging in non-Alzheimer tauopathies. Ann Neurol. 2017; 81(1): 117- 128. doi: 10.1002/ana.24844 27997036 PMC5319193
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [28] Marquié M, Verwer EE, Meltzer AC,. Lessons learned about [F-18]-AV-1451 off-target binding from an autopsy-confirmed Parkinson’s case. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2017; 5(1): 75. doi: 10.1186/s40478-017-0482-0 29047416 PMC5648451
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [30] Smith R, Puschmann A, Schöll M,. 18F-AV-1451 tau PET imaging correlates strongly with tau neuropathology in MAPT mutation carriers. Brain. 2016; 139(pt 9): 2372- 2379. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww163 27357347 PMC4995360
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe A16 study cohort was older than typical symptomatic patients with AD recruited into clinical trials, had more advanced clinical disease with only 1 case of mild cognitive impairment, and lacked racial/ethnic diversity.
“The A16 study cohort was older than the typical symptomatic patients with AD recruited into clinical trials, had more advanced clinical disease with only 1 case of mild cognitive impairment, and lacked racial/ethnic diversity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThis level of activity may represent noise or early spread of tau.
“This level of activity may represent noise or early spread of tau.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEarlier stages of AD may meet intermediate pathological diagnostic criteria or have neuritic plaque with moderate or frequent CERAD scores in the absence of substantial tau.
“Earlier stages of AD may meet intermediate pathological diagnostic criteria or have neuritic plaque with moderate or frequent CERAD scores in the absence of substantial tau.6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K,; Contributors. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018; 14(4): 535- 562. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 29653606 PMC5958625 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenPET scan read errors may also have been associated with imprecise drawing of the cerebellar reference region, resulting in reduced mean cerebellar counts and relatively increased cortical signal above the threshold.
“PET scan read errors may also have been associated with imprecise drawing of the cerebellar reference region, resulting in reduced mean cerebellar counts and relatively increased cortical signal above the threshold.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe source of this binding is unknown, but given these locations, it can typically be distinguished from neocortical binding in regions associated with AD pathology.
“The source of this binding is unknown, but given these locations, it can typically be distinguished from neocortical binding in regions associated with AD pathology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThese types of scan read errors are potentially mitigated through improved reader training or procedural automation.
“These types of scan read errors are potentially mitigated through improved reader training or procedural automation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Tau pathology does not change substantially between antemortem flortaucipir positron emission tomography imaging and postmortem assessment.
“Participants with cognitive impairment who did not come to autopsy within 9 months after the flortaucipir scan were either removed from the study or required to undergo a repeat flortaucipir scan for comparison with the neuropathological result. Cognitively normal patients remained eligible for autopsy, regardless of the time from scan to autopsy.”
“After removal of the 3 test cases, the remaining 64 participants were included in the A16 primary cohort, with autopsy occurring a mean (SD) 16.2 (15.0) hours from the recorded time of death and 2.6 (2.14) months after [18F]flortaucipir imaging.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies combining antemortem imaging with neuropathological validation have shown 18F-flortaucipir PET is highly sensitive for presence of high levels of AD neuropathological change, with visual rating positivity corresponding to Braak levels IV or greater.
“Studies combining antemortem imaging with neuropathological validation have shown that 18F-flortaucipir PET is highly sensitive for presence of high levels of AD neuropathological change with visual rating positivity corresponding to Braak levels IV or greater [184, 185].”
From The use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia (2023) · cites this paper as [184]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCurrent in-vivo detection of tau positivity using 18F-flortaucipir PET seems to correspond only to widespread tau pathology (Braak stages ≥IV), whereas CSF phosphorylated tau elevation can reflect earlier stages of tauopathy.
“The current in-vivo detection of tau positivity using 18F-flortaucipir PET seems to correspond only to widespread tau pathology in the brain (ie, Braak stages ≥IV),69 whereas CSF phosphorylated tau elevation can reflect earlier stages of tauopathy.70”
From Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations of the International Working Group (2021) · cites this paper as [69]
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282 · see citing works
Hirono, N., Mori, E., Ikejiri, Y., Imamura, T., Shimomura, T., Hashimoto, M., Yamashita, H., & Ikeda, M. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 21,010 · see citing works
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589 · see citing works
Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place
Peek, S. T. M., Luijkx, K. G., Rijnaard, M. D., Nieboer, M. E., van der Voort, C. S., Aarts, S., van Hoof, J., Vrijhoef, H. J., & Wouters, E. (2015) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000430949 · Cited by 19,803 · see citing works
Sensitivity and False Alarm Rate of a Fall Sensor in Long-Term Fall Detection in the Elderly
Kangas, M., Korpelainen, R., Vikman, I., Nyberg, L., & Jämsä, T. J. (2014) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000362720 · Cited by 19,003 · see citing works
McKhann, G. M., Knopman, D. S., Chertkow, H., Hyman, B. T., Jack, C. R., Kawas, C. H., Klunk, W. E., Koroshetz, W. J., Manly, J. J., Mayeux, R., et al. (2011) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 · Cited by 18,657 · see citing works
Cook, R. J., Dickens, B. M., & Fathalla, M. F. (2003) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199241323.003.0025 · Cited by 10,813 · see citing works
NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease
Jack, C. R., Bennett, D. A., Blennow, K., Carrillo, M. C., Dunn, B., Haeberlein, S. B., Holtzman, D. M., Jagust, W., Jessen, F., Karlawish, J., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 · Cited by 10,537 · see citing works
Self-citationMirra, S. S., Heyman, A., McKeel, D., Sumi, S. M., Crain, B. J., Brownlee, L. M., Vogel, F. S., Hughes, J. P., Belle, G. V., Berg, L., et al. (1991) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.41.4.479 · Cited by 4,961 · see citing works
Querfurth, H. W., & LaFerla, F. M. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0909142 · Cited by 4,569 · see citing works
Phases of Aβ-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD
Thal, D. R., Rüb, U., Orantes, M., & Braak, H. (2002) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.58.12.1791 · Cited by 3,490 · see citing works
Braak, H., Alafuzoff, I., Arzberger, T., Kretzschmar, H., & Del Tredici, K. (2006) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-006-0127-z · Cited by 3,172 · see citing works
Hyman, B. T., Phelps, C. H., Beach, T. G., Bigio, E. H., Cairns, N. J., Carrillo, M. C., Dickson, D. W., Duyckaerts, C., Frosch, M. P., Masliah, E., et al. (2012) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.007 · Cited by 3,092 · see citing works
Self-citationMontine, T. J., Phelps, C. H., Beach, T. G., Bigio, E. H., Cairns, N. J., Dickson, D. W., Duyckaerts, C., Frosch, M. P., Masliah, E., Mirra, S. S., et al. (2012) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-011-0910-3 · Cited by 2,992 · see citing works
Self-citationNelson, P. T., Alafuzoff, I., Bigio, E. H., Bouras, C., Braak, H., Cairns, N. J., Castellani, R. J., Crain, B. J., Davies, P., Tredici, K. D., et al. (2012) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/nen.0b013e31825018f7 · Cited by 2,050 · see citing works
Self-citationRevising the definition of Alzheimer's disease: a new lexicon
Dubois, B., Feldman, H. H., Jacova, C., Cummings, J. L., DeKosky, S. T., Barberger-Gateau, P., Delacourte, A., Frisoni, G., Fox, N. C., Galasko, D., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70223-4 · Cited by 1,869 · see citing works
Self-citationJorm, A. F. (1994) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329170002691x · Cited by 1,197 · see citing works
Masters, C. L., Multhaup, G., Simms, G., Pottgiesser, J., Martins, R. N., & Beyreuther, K. T. (1985) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb04000.x · Cited by 1,043 · see citing works
Paired Helical Filaments in Electron Microscopy of Alzheimer's Disease
KIDD, M. (1963) · Nature · doi:10.1038/197192b0 · Cited by 1,012 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Both the A16 primary cohort and FR01 validation studies tested the primary hypotheses (1) that an antemortem pattern of [18F]flortaucipir retention consistent with AD would correspond with a postmortem B3-level (Braak stage V or VI) pattern of tau pathology accumulation at autopsy34 and (2) that the AD pattern would o…”
BackgroundRole of tau protein in both physiological and pathological conditions
AVILA, J., LUCAS, J. J., PÉREZ, M., & HERNÁNDEZ, F. (2004) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00024.2003 · Cited by 1,005 · see citing works
Tau positron emission tomographic imaging in aging and early <scp>A</scp> lzheimer disease
Johnson, K. A., Schultz, A., Betensky, R. A., Becker, J. A., Sepulcre, J., Rentz, D., Mormino, E., Chhatwal, J., Amariglio, R., Papp, K., et al. (2016) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24546 · Cited by 986 · see citing works
Clark, C. M., Pontecorvo, M. J., Beach, T. G., Bedell, B. J., Coleman, R. E., Doraiswamy, P. M., Fleisher, A. S., Reiman, E. M., Sabbagh, M. N., Sadowsky, C. H., et al. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70142-4 · Cited by 855 · see citing works
Self-citationWong, D. F., Rosenberg, P. B., Zhou, Y., Kumar, A., Raymont, V., Ravert, H. T., Dannals, R. F., Nandi, A., Brašić, J. R., Ye, W., et al. (2010) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.109.069088 · Cited by 684 · see citing works
Self-citationEarly Clinical PET Imaging Results with the Novel PHF-Tau Radioligand [F18]-T808
Chien, D. T., Szardenings, A. K., Bahri, S., Walsh, J. C., Mu, F., Xia, C. A., Shankle, W. R., Lerner, A. J., Su, M., Elizarov, A. M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-130098 · Cited by 676 · see citing works
Early clinical PET imaging results with the novel PHF-tau radioligand [F-18]-T807
Chien, D. T., Bahri, S., Szardenings, A. K., Walsh, J. C., Mu, F., Su, M.-Y., Shankle, W. R., Elizarov, A., & Kolb, H. C. (2013) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-122059 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
Xia, C., Arteaga, J., Chen, G., Gangadharmath, U., Gomez, L. F., Kasi, D., Lam, C., Liang, Q., Liu, C., Mocharla, V. P., et al. (2013) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.008 · Cited by 605 · see citing works
Florbetaben PET imaging to detect amyloid beta plaques in Alzheimer's disease: Phase 3 study
Sabri, O., Sabbagh, M. N., Seibyl, J., Barthel, H., Akatsu, H., Ouchi, Y., Senda, K., Murayama, S., Ishii, K., Takao, M., et al. (2015) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2015.02.004 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Self-citationBerendsen, A. A. M., Kang, J. H., van de Rest, O., Jankovic, N., Kampman, E., Jong, J. C. K., Franco, O. H., Ikram, M. A., Pikhart, H., Nilsson, L. M., et al. (2017) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000464269 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Mild cognitive impairment is related to Alzheimer disease pathology and cerebral infarctions
Bennett, D. A., Schneider, J. A., Bienias, J. L., Evans, D. A., & Wilson, R. S. (2005) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000152982.47274.9e · Cited by 537 · see citing works
Bennett, D. A., Schneider, J. A., Wilson, R. S., Bienias, J. L., & Arnold, S. E. (2004) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.61.3.378 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONIZATION GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE
Dixon, J. R. (1999) · Quality Assurance · doi:10.1080/105294199277860 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
Ossenkoppele, R., Rabinovici, G. D., Smith, R., Cho, H., Schöll, M., Strandberg, O., Palmqvist, S., Mattsson, N., Janelidze, S., Santillo, A., et al. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.12917 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Mutations causing neurodegenerative tauopathies
Goedert, M., & Jakes, R. (2005) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2004.08.007 · Cited by 438 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Both the A16 primary cohort and FR01 validation studies tested the primary hypotheses (1) that an antemortem pattern of [18F]flortaucipir retention consistent with AD would correspond with a postmortem B3-level (Braak stage V or VI) pattern of tau pathology accumulation at autopsy34 and (2) that the AD pattern would o…”
BackgroundPontecorvo, M. J., Devous, M. D., Navitsky, M., Lu, M., Salloway, S., Schaerf, F. W., Jennings, D., Arora, A. K., McGeehan, A., Lim, N. C., et al. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aww334 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Self-citationCurtis, C., Gamez, J. E., Singh, U., Sadowsky, C. H., Villena, T., Sabbagh, M. N., Beach, T. G., Duara, R., Fleisher, A. S., Frey, K. A., et al. (2015) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4144 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Self-citationPontecorvo, M. J., Devous, M. D., Kennedy, I., Navitsky, M., Lu, M., Galante, N., Salloway, S., Doraiswamy, P. M., Southekal, S., Arora, A. K., et al. (2019) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awz090 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Self-citationTau-positron emission tomography correlates with neuropathology findings.
Lowe, V. J., Lundt, E. S., Albertson, S. M., Min, H., Fang, P., Przybelski, S. A., Senjem, M. L., Schwarz, C. G., Kantarci, K., Boeve, B., et al. (2020) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2019.09.079 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Self-citationPathological correlations of [F‐18]‐AV‐1451 imaging in non‐alzheimer tauopathies
Marquié, M., Normandin, M. D., Meltzer, A. C., Siao Tick Chong, M., Andrea, N. V., Antón‐Fernández, A., Klunk, W. E., Mathis, C. A., Ikonomovic, M. D., Debnath, M., et al. (2017) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24844 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Self-citationSchonhaut, D. R., McMillan, C. T., Spina, S., Dickerson, B. C., Siderowf, A., Devous, M. D., Tsai, R., Winer, J., Russell, D. S., Litvan, I., et al. (2017) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.25060 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Self-citationPART, a distinct tauopathy, different from classical sporadic Alzheimer disease.
Jellinger, K. A., Alafuzoff, I., Attems, J., Beach, T. G., Cairns, N. J., Crary, J. F., Dickson, D. W., Hof, P. R., Hyman, B. T., Jack, C. R., et al. (2015) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-015-1407-2 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Self-citationSmith, R., Puschmann, A., Schöll, M., Ohlsson, T., van Swieten, J., Honer, M., Englund, E., & Hansson, O. (2016) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aww163 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
The Neuropathological Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease: Clinical-Pathological Studies
Hyman, B. T. (1997) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/s0197-4580(97)00066-3 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Lessons learned about [F-18]-AV-1451 off-target binding from an autopsy-confirmed Parkinson’s case.
Marquié, M., Verwer, E. E., Meltzer, A. C., Kim, S. J. W., Agüero, C., Gonzalez, J., Makaretz, S. J., Siao Tick Chong, M., Ramanan, P., Amaral, A. C., et al. (2017) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-017-0482-0 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Josephs, K. A., Whitwell, J. L., Tacik, P., Duffy, J. R., Senjem, M. L., Tosakulwong, N., Jack, C. R., Lowe, V., Dickson, D. W., & Murray, M. E. (2016) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1618-1 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationNelson, P. T., Abner, E. L., Schmitt, F. A., Kryscio, R. J., Jicha, G. A., Santacruz, K., Smith, C. D., Patel, E., & Markesbery, W. R. (2009) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/nen.0b013e3181aacbe9 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Correlation of In Vivo [<sup>18</sup>F]Flortaucipir With Postmortem Alzheimer Disease Tau Pathology
Smith, R., Wibom, M., Pawlik, D., Englund, E., & Hansson, O. (2019) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3692 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
A brief history of “Alzheimer disease”
Knopman, D. S., Petersen, R. C., & Jack, C. R. (2019) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000007583 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Flortaucipir F 18 quantitation using parametric estimation of reference signal intensity.
Southekal, S., Devous, M. D., Kennedy, I., Navitsky, M., Lu, M., Joshi, A. D., Pontecorvo, M. J., & Mintun, M. A. (2018) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.117.200006 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationDuyckaerts, C., Brion, J. P., Hauw, J. J., & Flament-Durand, J. (1987) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00693783 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
McMillan, C. T., Irwin, D. J., Nasrallah, I., Phillips, J. S., Spindler, M., Rascovsky, K., Ternes, K., Jester, C., Wolk, D. A., Kwong, L. K., et al. (2016) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1640-3 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationTest-retest reproducibility for the tau PET imaging agent flortaucipir F 18.
Devous, M. D., Joshi, A. D., Navitsky, M., Southekal, S., Pontecorvo, M. J., Shen, H., Lu, M., Shankle, W. R., Seibyl, J. P., Marek, K., et al. (2018) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.117.200691 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationDickstein, D. L., Pullman, M. Y., Fernandez, C., Short, J. A., Kostakoğlu, L., Knešaurek, K., Soleimani, L., Jordan, B. D., Gordon, W. A., Dams-O’Connor, K., et al. (2016) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2016.175 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Tau neuropathology correlates with FDG-PET, but not AV-1451-PET, in progressive supranuclear palsy.
Smith, R., Schöll, M., Honer, M., Nilsson, C. F., Englund, E., & Hansson, O. (2017) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1650-1 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
A 2-process model for neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease
Mungas, D., Tractenberg, R., Schneider, J. A., Crane, P. K., & Bennett, D. A. (2014) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.08.007 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic persons with Alzheimer disease neuropathology
Monsell, S. E., Mock, C., Roe, C. M., Ghoshal, N., Morris, J. C., Cairns, N. J., & Kukull, W. A. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e318295d7a1 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Dickson, T. C., Saunders, H. L., & Vickers, J. C. (1997) · Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2990.1997.tb01325.x · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Abdi, H., Williams, L. J., Beaton, D., Posamentier, M. T., Harris, T. S., Krishnan, A., & Devous, M. D. (2012) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-2012-112111 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationIn vivo [ <sup>18</sup> F]-AV-1451 tau-PET imaging in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease
Day, G. S., Gordon, B. A., Perrin, R. J., Cairns, N. J., Beaumont, H., Schwetye, K., Ferguson, C., Sinha, N., Bucelli, R., Musiek, E. S., et al. (2018) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000005064 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Kotari, V., Southekal, S. S., Navitsky, M. A., Kennedy, I. A., Lu, M., Morris, A., Zimmer, J. A., Fleisher, A., Mintun, M. A., Devous, M. D., et al. (2023) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-023-01160-6 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationO5‐01‐06: EARLY TAU DETECTION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR DISEASE PROGRESSION
Kotari, V., Navitsky, M. A., Southekal, S. S., et al. (2019) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2019.06.4839 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationSiderowf, A. D., Dirk Keene, C., Beach, T. G., Montine, T. J., Arora, A., Devous, M. D., Navitsky, M., Kennedy, I., Joshi, A. D., Pontecorvo, M. J., et al. (2017) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.1038 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationSouthekal, S., Kotari, V., Devous, M. D., Navitsky, M., Kennedy, I., Beach, T. G., Montine, T. J., Arora, A., Flitter, M. L., Fleisher, A. S., et al. (2019) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2019.08.008 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Fleisher, 2018, Tau PET imaging as a screening tool for clinical trials of disease modifying therapies., J Prev Alzheimers Dis, 5, S17
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Donanemab in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease: The TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 Randomized Clinical Trial
Sims, J. R., Zimmer, J. A., Evans, C. D., Lu, M., Ardayfio, P., Sparks, J., Wessels, A. M., Shcherbinin, S., Wang, H., Monkul Nery, E. S., et al. (2023) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.13239 · Cited by 2,932 · see citing works
Self-citationRevised criteria for diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer's disease: Alzheimer's Association Workgroup
Jack, C. R., Andrews, J. S., Beach, T. G., Buracchio, T., Dunn, B., Graf, A., Hansson, O., Ho, C., Jagust, W., McDade, E., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13859 · Cited by 2,803 · see citing works
Self-citationDonanemab in Early Alzheimer’s Disease
Mintun, M. A., Lo, A. C., Duggan Evans, C., Wessels, A. M., Ardayfio, P. A., Andersen, S. W., Shcherbinin, S., Sparks, J., Sims, J. R., Brys, M., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2100708 · Cited by 1,728 · see citing works
Self-citationBiomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases
Hansson, O. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01382-x · Cited by 1,159 · see citing works
Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations of the International Working Group
Dubois, B., Villain, N., Frisoni, G. B., Rabinovici, G. D., Sabbagh, M., Cappa, S., Bejanin, A., Bombois, S., Epelbaum, S., Teichmann, M., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00066-1 · Cited by 1,051 · see citing works
“The current in-vivo definition ability of tau PET to detect ‘tau positivity’ using flortaucipir PET seems to correspond only to widespread tau pathology in the brain (i.e. Braak stages ≥IV) 43 , while CSF phospho-tau (p-tau) elevation may reflect earlier stages of tauopathy 44 .”
BackgroundSelf-citationFour distinct trajectories of tau deposition identified in Alzheimer’s disease
Initiative, T. A. D. N., Vogel, J. W., Young, A. L., Oxtoby, N. P., Smith, R., Ossenkoppele, R., Strandberg, O. T., La Joie, R., Aksman, L. M., Grothe, M. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01309-6 · Cited by 741 · see citing works
Self-citationTau biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease: towards implementation in clinical practice and trials
Ossenkoppele, R., van der Kant, R., & Hansson, O. (2022) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00168-5 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
Blood biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease in clinical practice and trials
Hansson, O., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., & Dage, J. (2023) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-023-00403-3 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Ossenkoppele, R., Pichet Binette, A., Groot, C., Smith, R., Strandberg, O., Palmqvist, S., Stomrud, E., Tideman, P., Ohlsson, T., Jögi, J., et al. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-02049-x · Cited by 496 · see citing works
Economic burden of Alzheimer disease and managed care considerations
Winston Wong, P. (2020) · The American Journal of Managed Care · doi:10.37765/ajmc.2020.88482 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Ossenkoppele, R., Smith, R., Mattsson-Carlgren, N., Groot, C., Leuzy, A., Strandberg, O., Palmqvist, S., Olsson, T., Jögi, J., Stormrud, E., et al. (2021) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.1858 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Self-citationBlood phospho-tau in Alzheimer disease: analysis, interpretation, and clinical utility
Karikari, T. K., Ashton, N. J., Brinkmalm, G., Brum, W. S., Benedet, A. L., Montoliu‐Gaya, L., Lantero‐Rodriguez, J., Pascoal, T. A., Suárez‐Calvet, M., Rosa‐Neto, P., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-022-00665-2 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
Tauopathies: new perspectives and challenges
Zhang, Y., Wu, K.-M., Yang, L., Dong, Q., & Yu, J.-T. (2022) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-022-00533-z · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Biomarker modeling of Alzheimer’s disease using PET-based Braak staging
Therriault, J., Pascoal, T. A., Lussier, F. Z., Tissot, C., Chamoun, M., Bezgin, G., Servaes, S., Benedet, A. L., Ashton, N. J., Karikari, T. K., et al. (2022) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-022-00204-0 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
“Case-to-autopsy studies have suggested that [ 18 F]Flortaucipir PET cannot reliably detect the presence of tau neurofibrillary tangles in early Braak regions at autopsy 41,42 .”
Schindler, S. E., Galasko, D. R., Pereira, A. C., Rabinovici, G. D., Salloway, S., Suárez‐Calvet, M., Khachaturian, A. S., Mielke, M. M., Udeh‐Momoh, C. T., Weiss, J. O., et al. (2024) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-024-00977-5 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
“A visual read of 18 F-flortaucipir PET had a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 81% for a measure of neurofibrillary tangle and amyloid pathology 67 .”
Self-citationSengupta, U., & Kayed, R. (2022) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102270 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Comorbid neuropathological diagnoses in early versus late-onset Alzheimer's disease
Spina, S., La Joie, R., Petersen, C., Nolan, A. L., Cuevas, D., Cosme, C., Hepker, M., Hwang, J.-H., Miller, Z. A., Huang, E. J., et al. (2021) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awab099 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Self-citationDubois, B., von Arnim, C. A. F., Burnie, N., Bozeat, S., & Cummings, J. (2023) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-023-01314-6 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
“Tau PET, which visualizes neurofibrillary tangles, is predominantly used in the research setting; it is the only autopsy-validated (sensitivity, 92 − 100%; specificity, 52 − 92%), direct marker of neurofibrillary tangles, as fluid markers have not demonstrated similar accuracy [33].”
BackgroundHampel, H., Hu, Y., Cummings, J., Mattke, S., Iwatsubo, T., Nakamura, A., Vellas, B., O’Bryant, S., Shaw, L. M., Cho, M., et al. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.05.017 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Soluble P‐tau217 reflects amyloid and tau pathology and mediates the association of amyloid with tau
Mattsson‐Carlgren, N., Janelidze, S., Bateman, R. J., Smith, R., Stomrud, E., Serrano, G. E., Reiman, E. M., Palmqvist, S., Dage, J. L., Beach, T. G., et al. (2021) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.202114022 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
“…(Su arez-Calvet et al, 2020), also in individuals who are tau-negative as determined by positron emission tomography (PET) (Barth elemy et al, 2020b; Mattsson-Carlgren et al, 2020) (but note that tau PET has limited sensitivity to detect very sparse tau aggregation (Fleisher et al, 2020)).”
BackgroundSelf-citationCSF MTBR-tau243 is a specific biomarker of tau tangle pathology in Alzheimer’s disease
Horie, K., Salvadó, G., Barthélemy, N. R., Janelidze, S., Li, Y., He, Y., Saef, B., Chen, C. D., Jiang, H., Strandberg, O., et al. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02443-z · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Donanemab: Appropriate use recommendations
Rabinovici, G. D., Selkoe, D. J., Schindler, S. E., Aisen, P., Apostolova, L. G., Atri, A., Greenberg, S. M., Hendrix, S. B., Petersen, R. C., Weiner, M., et al. (2025) · The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100150 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
“In settings where amyloid PET is not available to monitor treatment response, clinicians may choose to limit the duration of treatment, for example limit treatment to 18 months based on the knowledge that over 75 % of patients in TRAILBLAZER-ALZ2 achieved amyloid clearance on PET in that timeframe.”
Self-citationShcherbinin, S., Evans, C. D., Lu, M., Andersen, S. W., Pontecorvo, M. J., Willis, B. A., Gueorguieva, I., Hauck, P. M., Brooks, D. A., Mintun, M. A., et al. (2022) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2793 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Self-citationThe use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia
Chouliaras, L., & O’Brien, J. T. (2023) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-023-02215-8 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
“Studies combining antemortem imaging with neuropathological validation have shown that 18 F-fl ortaucipir PET is highly sensitive for presence of high levels of AD neuropathological change with visual rating positivity corresponding to Braak levels IV or greater [184, 185].”
MethodSoleimani‐Meigooni, D. N., Iaccarino, L., Joie, R. L., Baker, S. L., Bourakova, V., Boxer, A. L., Edwards, L., Eser, R. A., Gorno‐Tempini, M., Jagust, W. J., et al. (2020) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awaa276 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Self-citationBiel, D., Brendel, M., Rubinski, A., Büerger, K., Janowitz, D., Dichgans, M., Franzmeier, N., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2021) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-021-00880-x · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Dissecting the clinical heterogeneity of early-onset Alzheimer’s disease
Sirkis, D. W., Bonham, L. W., Johnson, T. P., La Joie, R., & Yokoyama, J. S. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01531-9 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
“PET-toautopsy studies [89, 110, 111] have shown that tau-PET can reliably detect advanced levels of tau pathology that are believed to account for cognitive impairment and dementia (Braak stages IV–VI).”
Predicting amyloid PET and tau PET stages with plasma biomarkers
Jack, C. R., Wiste, H. J., Algeciras‐Schimnich, A., Figdore, D. J., Schwarz, C. G., Lowe, V. J., Ramanan, V. K., Vemuri, P., Mielke, M. M., Knopman, D. S., et al. (2023) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awad042 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Self-citationRecent update on the heterogeneity of the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum
Jellinger, K. A. (2021) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-021-02449-2 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Chalcone and its analogs: Therapeutic and diagnostic applications in Alzheimer’s disease
Thapa, P., Upadhyay, S. P., Suo, W. Z., Singh, V., Gurung, P., Lee, E. S., Sharma, R., & Sharma, M. (2021) · Bioorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.104681 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Rabinovici, G. D., Knopman, D. S., Arbizu, J., Benzinger, T. L. S., Donohoe, K. J., Hansson, O., Herscovitch, P., Kuo, P. H., Lingler, J. H., Minoshima, S., et al. (2025) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.14338 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Self-citationTauvid™: The First FDA-Approved PET Tracer for Imaging Tau Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease
Jie, C. V. M. L., Treyer, V., Schibli, R., & Mu, L. (2021) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph14020110 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
“The PET scans of previously acquired studies (Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, NCT02516046 and NCT02016560) were used to evaluate the interpretation of the scans by independent, blinded readers [40].”
MethodWeiner, M. W., Veitch, D. P., Miller, M. J., Aisen, P. S., Albala, B., Beckett, L. A., Green, R. C., Harvey, D., Jack, C. R., Jagust, W., et al. (2023) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12797 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Tau PET Imaging in Neurodegenerative Disorders
Groot, C., Villeneuve, S., Smith, R., Hansson, O., & Ossenkoppele, R. (2022) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.121.263196 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Ossenkoppele, R., Reimand, J., Smith, R. A., Leuzy, A., Strandberg, O. T., Palmqvist, S., Stomrud, E., Zetterberg, H., Initiative, T. A. D. N., Scheltens, P., et al. (2021) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.202114398 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
“Additionally, in light of the recent FDA approval of one of the tau PET tracers (i.e. [18F]flortaucipir, Fleisher et al, 2020), and the rapid development of blood-based p-tau biomarkers, clinicians in specialized care settings may soon have multiple tau biomarker options at their disposal.”
BackgroundBinette, A. P., Gaiteri, C., Wennström, M., Kumar, A., Hristovska, I., Spotorno, N., Salvadó, G., Strandberg, O. T., Mathys, H., Tsai, L., et al. (2024) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01737-w · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Research Criteria for the Behavioral Variant of Alzheimer Disease
Ossenkoppele, R., Singleton, E., Groot, C., Dijkstra, A., Eikelboom, W., Seeley, W., Miller, B., Laforce, R., Scheltens, P., Papma, J., et al. (2021) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.4417 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Self-citationPET Neuroimaging of Alzheimer's Disease: Radiotracers and Their Utility in Clinical Research
Bao, W., Xie, F., Zuo, C., Guan, Y., & Huang, Y. H. (2021) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.624330 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
“…brain regions, starting from the medial temporal lobe, i.e., hippocampus and entorhinal cortex (Braak stage I–II), to the adjacent neocortices (Braak stage III–IV), and finally to the entire brain (Braak stage V–VI) (Cho et al., 2019; Leuzy et al., 2019; Baek et al., 2020; Fleisher et al., 2020).”
BackgroundOssenkoppele, R., Salvadó, G., Janelidze, S., Binette, A. P., Bali, D., Karlsson, L., Palmqvist, S., Mattsson, N., Stomrud, E., Therriault, J., et al. (2025) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-025-00835-z · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Pyroglutamate Aβ cascade as drug target in Alzheimer’s disease
Bayer, T. A. (2021) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01409-2 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Direct Comparison of the Tau PET Tracers18F-Flortaucipir and18F-MK-6240 in Human Subjects
Gogola, A., Minhas, D. S., Villemagne, V. L., Cohen, A. D., Mountz, J. M., Pascoal, T. A., Laymon, C. M., Mason, N. S., Ikonomović, M. D., Mathis, C. A., et al. (2021) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.120.254961 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“Flortaucipir shows high in vitro binding affinity and selectivity for paired helical filament tau (PHF-tau) constituting NFT pathology, and in vivo indices of tau load correlate well with postmortem AD-related tau pathology (10).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationThe Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS): Framework and methodology
Apostolova, L. G., Aisen, P. S. S., Eloyan, A., Fagan, A. M., Fargo, K. N., Foroud, T., Gatsonis, C. A., Grinberg, L. T., Jack, C. R., Kramer, J. H., et al. (2021) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12350 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
“75 Scans will be quantitatively classified as tau-positive or tau-negative based on an SUVR threshold of 1.27 76 using a temporal “meta region-of-interest.””
InfluentialSelf-citationAlosco, M. L., Mariani, M. L., Adler, C. H., Balcer, L. J., Bernick, C. B., Au, R., Banks, S. J., Barr, W., Sylvain Bouix, A., Cantu, R. C., et al. (2021) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-021-00872-x · Cited by 90 · see citing works
“For instance, the PET radiotracer flortaucipir (AV1451; T807) demonstrates high affinity binding to the mixed 3R/4R tau isoforms in AD [92].”
Network structure and transcriptomic vulnerability shape atrophy in frontotemporal dementia
Shafiei, G., Bazinet, V., Dadar, M., Manera, A. L., Collins, D. L., Dagher, A., Borroni, B., Sánchez‐Valle, R., Moreno, F., Laforce, R. J., et al. (2022) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awac069 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationAmyloid, tau and metabolic PET correlates of cognition in early and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease
Tanner, J. A., Iaccarino, L., Edwards, L., Asken, B. M., Gorno‐Tempini, M. L., Kramer, J. H., Pham, J. Q., Perry, D. C., Possin, K. L., Malpetti, M., et al. (2022) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awac229 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Young, C. B., Winer, J. R., Younes, K., Cody, K. A., Betthauser, T. J., Johnson, S. C., Schultz, A., Sperling, R. A., Greicius, M. D., Cobos, I., et al. (2022) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.0676 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationThal, D. R., & Tomé, S. O. (2022) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2022.10.006 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Neuropathological assessment of the Alzheimer spectrum
Jellinger, K. A. (2020) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-020-02232-9 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Leuzy, A., Pascoal, T. A., Strandberg, O. T., Insel, P. S., Smith, R. A., Mattsson, N., Benedet, A. L., Cho, H., Lyoo, C. H., Joie, R. L., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-021-05401-4 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Boccalini, C., Ribaldi, F., Hristovska, I., Arnone, A., Peretti, D. E., Mu, L., Scheffler, M., Perani, D., Frisoni, G. B., & Garibotto, V. (2024) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13355 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
“31 A Centiloid value of 19 was used as the cut-off point to define A + versus A. 32 T : Tau distribution was visually assessed by two expert nuclear medicine physicians (V.G., D.P.), according to published recommendations, 33 describing regions of increased [ 18 F]flortaucipir uptake.”
MethodCurrent directions in tau research: Highlights from Tau 2020
Sexton, C. E., Snyder, H. M., Beher, D., Boxer, A. L., Brannelly, P., Brion, J., Buée, L., Cacace, A. M., Chételat, G., Citron, M., et al. (2021) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12452 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Lesman‐Segev, O. H., Joie, R. L., Iaccarino, L., Lobach, I. V., Rosen, H. J., Seo, S. W., Janabi, M., Baker, S. L., Edwards, L., Pham, J. Q., et al. (2020) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.25968 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationOverview of tau PET molecular imaging
Petersen, G. C., Roytman, M., Chiang, G. C.-Y., Li, Y., Gordon, M. L., & Franceschi, A. M. (2022) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0000000000001035 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Peet, B. T., Spina, S., Mundada, N., & La Joie, R. (2021) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-021-01101-x · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Iaccarino, L., Burnham, S. C., Dell’Agnello, G., Dowsett, S. A., & Epelbaum, S. (2023) · The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.14283/jpad.2023.43 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“More recently, given the high predictive value of amyloid- and tau-PET techniques versus the respective pathologies at autopsy (12-15), fluidbased biomarkers are also being validated using PETbased findings as the surrogate SoT.”
BackgroundMethodRabinovici, G. D., Knopman, D. S., Arbizu, J., Benzinger, T. L. S., Donohoe, K. J., Hansson, O., Herscovitch, P., Kuo, P. H., Lingler, J. H., Minoshima, S., et al. (2025) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.124.268756 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationStructural mechanism for specific binding of chemical compounds to amyloid fibrils
Tao, Y., Xia, W., Zhao, Q., Xiang, H., Han, C., Zhang, S., Gu, W., Tang, W., Li, Y., Tan, L., et al. (2023) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-023-01370-x · Cited by 74 · see citing works
CenTauR: Toward a universal scale and masks for standardizing tau imaging studies
Villemagne, V. L., Leuzy, A., Bohorquez, S. M. S., Bullich, S., Shimada, H., Rowe, C. C., Bourgeat, P., Lopresti, B. J., Huang, K., Krishnadas, N., et al. (2023) · Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring · doi:10.1002/dad2.12454 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Leuzy, A., Ashton, N. J., Mattsson, N., Dodich, A., Boccardi, M., Corre, J., Drzezga, A. E., Nordberg, A. K., Ossenkoppele, R., Zetterberg, H., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-021-05258-7 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
“Overall, these studies suggest that CSF Aβ42 and P-tau reflect the intensity of the AD process (stage markers) with amyloid and Tau PET, by contrast, reflecting how the density and distribution of AD pathology [124, 125] (i.”
BackgroundPositronium image of the human brain in vivo
Moskal, P., Baran, J., Bass, S. D., Choiński, J., Chug, N., Curceanu, C., Czerwiński, E., Dadgar, M., Das, M., Dulski, K., et al. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adp2840 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Pathobiological Subtypes of Alzheimer Disease
Jellinger, K. (2021) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000508625 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Current and evolving treatment strategies for the Alzheimer disease continuum
Marasco, R. (2020) · The American Journal of Managed Care · doi:10.37765/ajmc.2020.88481 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Clinical Spectrum of Tauopathies
Olfati, N., Shoeibi, A., & Litvan, I. (2022) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.944806 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“Despite having high sensitivity and specificity for higher stages of AD pathology (230), flortaucipir showed much lower, but still significant, affinity to non-AD tau fibrils and, in this regard, significant off-target binding that is seen with this tracer (231) is a greater challenge in non-AD tau imaging.”
BackgroundFrequency and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Tau Positron Emission Tomography Positivity
Moscoso, A., Heeman, F., Raghavan, S., Costoya‐Sánchez, A., van Essen, M., Mainta, I., Camacho, V., Fonseca, O. D. R., Silva‐Rodríguez, J., Perissinotti, A., et al. (2025) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2025.7817 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationTau PET imaging with 18F-PI-2620 in aging and neurodegenerative diseases
Mormino, E. C., Toueg, T. N., Azevedo, E. C., Castillo, J. B., Guo, W., Nadiadwala, A., Corso, N. K., Hall, J. N., Fan, A. P., Trelle, A. N., et al. (2020) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-020-04923-7 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“(18)F-Flortaucipir (previously known as (18)F-T807 and (18)F-AV-1451) was the first promising tau PET ligand with initial publications beginning in 2013 [2], with recent work showing correspondence between in vivo imaging and postmortem tau aggregations within the same participants [3].”
BackgroundGroot, C., Smith, R. A., Collij, L. E., Mastenbroek, S. E., Stomrud, E., Binette, A. P., Leuzy, A., Palmqvist, S., Mattsson, N., Strandberg, O. T., et al. (2024) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1612 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Towards clinical application of tau PET tracers for diagnosing dementia due to Alzheimer's disease
Ossenkoppele, R., & Hansson, O. (2021) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12356 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: a field-test in a memory clinic
Altomare, D., Stampacchia, S., Ribaldi, F., Tomczyk, S., Chevalier, C., Poulain, G., Asadi, S., Bancila, B., Marizzoni, M., Martins, M., et al. (2023) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2022-330619 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“…in each patient by the same expert in nuclear medicine (VG), who visually analysed images in agreement with recently published recommendations, 26 describing regions of increased 18F-flortaucipir uptake in the regions corresponding to the pathologically defined Braak stages: medial temporal…”
MethodInternational consensus on the use of tau PET imaging agent 18F-flortaucipir in Alzheimer’s disease
Tian, M., Civelek, A. C., Carrió, I., Watanabe, Y., Kang, K. W., Murakami, K., Garibotto, V., Prior, J. O., Barthel, H., Zhou, R., et al. (2022) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-021-05673-w · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“The intensity scales, contrast, and background subtraction should be adjusted in order to obtain a predefined ratio with the cerebellar cortex used as reference [38].”
MethodAmyloid and Tau Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Tauopathies
Maschio, C., & Ni, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.838034 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Tau‐PET is superior to phospho‐tau when predicting cognitive decline in symptomatic AD patients
Smith, R., Cullen, N. C., Pichet Binette, A., Leuzy, A., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., Klein, G., Borroni, E., Ossenkoppele, R., Janelidze, S., et al. (2023) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12875 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Alzheimer’s disease and drug delivery across the blood–brain barrier: approaches and challenges
Iqbal, I., Saqib, F., Mubarak, Z., Latif, M. F., Wahid, M., Nasir, B., Shahzad, H., Sharifi-Rad, J., & Mubarak, M. S. (2024) · European Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.1186/s40001-024-01915-3 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“It had a sensitivity of 92–100% and a specificity of 52–92% for predicting tau pathology in a phase 3 postmortem validation investigation [64].”
BackgroundCummings, J. L., & Kinney, J. W. (2022) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina58070952 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“Tau protein in neurofibrillary tangles is measured with tau PET [75], and p-tau monomers are measured in CSF and plasma [76].”
MethodAguero, C., Dhaynaut, M., Amaral, A., Moon, S.-H., Neelamegam, R., Scapellato, M., Carazo-Casas, C., Kumar, S., Fakhri, G. E., Johnson, K. A., et al. (2024) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-023-02672-z · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“…tauopathies who underwent [ 18 F]-Flortaucipir PET scans while alive and came to autopsy have further shown the lack of a consistent and robust correlation between levels of in vivo tracer retention and the topographical distribution and burdens of tau lesions quantified at postmortem [15, 26, 32].”
BackgroundDeterminants of cognitive and brain resilience to tau pathology: a longitudinal analysis
Bocancea, D. I., Svenningsson, A. L., van Loenhoud, A. C., Groot, C., Barkhof, F., Strandberg, O. T., Smith, R. A., Initiative, A. D. N., Weiner, M. W., Aisen, P., et al. (2023) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awad100 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationBischof, G. N., Dodich, A., Boccardi, M., van Eimeren, T., Festari, C., Barthel, H., Hansson, O., Nordberg, A. K., Ossenkoppele, R., Sabri, O., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-020-05156-4 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
“This gold standard has recently been provided for (18)F-AV1451 [43], which addressed some challenges associated with the translation of neuropathological staging to measurement of continuous in vivo tau pathology into an accurate visual reading protocol.”
BackgroundMethodLu, M., Pontecorvo, M. J., Devous, M. D., Arora, A. K., Galante, N., McGeehan, A., Devadanam, C., Salloway, S. P., Doraiswamy, P. M., Curtis, C., et al. (2021) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.5505 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationSong, M., Beyer, L., Kaiser, L., Barthel, H., van Eimeren, T., MAREK, K. L., Nitschmann, A., Scheifele, M., Palleis, C., Respondek, G., et al. (2021) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1177/0271678x211018904 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Appleton, J., Finn, Q., Zanotti-Fregonara, P., Yu, M., Faridar, A., Nakawah, M. O., Zarate, C., Carrillo, M. C., Dickerson, B. C., Rabinovici, G. D., et al. (2025) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awae234 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationDickerson, B. C., Atri, A., Clevenger, C. K., Karlawish, J. H., Knopman, D. S., Lin, P., Norman, M., Onyike, C. U., Sano, M., Scanland, S., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.14337 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“The workgroup appreciates that imaging biomarkers, including tau PET (approved by the FDA in 2020 151 ) and plasma biomarkers 21,102 as well as digital biomarkers (e.g., wearables to monitor aspects of physiology, behavior, or sensorimotor functions 152 and self-administered remote computerized…”
Ossenkoppele, R., Coomans, E. M., Apostolova, L. G., Baker, S. L., Barthel, H., Beach, T. G., Benzinger, T. L. S., Betthauser, T. J., Bischof, G. N., Bottlaender, M., et al. (2025) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-025-02000-6 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“[ 18 F]Flortaucipir was used in most patients ( n = 6,480, 25 cohorts), followed by [ 18 F]MK6240 ( n = 3,156, 11 cohorts), [ 18 F]RO948 ( n = 1,984, 3 cohorts) and [ 18 F]PI2620 ( n = 428, 4 cohorts).”
InfluentialSelf-citationMoscoso, A., Karikari, T. K., Grothe, M. J., Ashton, N. J., Lantero‐Rodriguez, J., Snellman, A., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., & Schöll, M. (2022) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12570 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Quantification of amyloid beta and tau PET without a structural MRI
Landau, S. M., Ward, T. J., Murphy, A., Iaccarino, L., Harrison, T. M., Joie, R. L., Baker, S. L., Koeppe, R. A., Jagust, W. J., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2022) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12668 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Leuzy, A., Rakêt, L. L., Villemagne, V. L., Klein, G., Tonietto, M., Olafson, E., Baker, S. L., Saad, Z. S., Bullich, S., Lopresti, B. J., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13908 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationTimsina, J., Ali, M., Do, A. N., Wang, L., Western, D., Sung, Y. J., & Cruchaga, C. (2023) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106373 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“…Tau PET tracers (i.e., 18 F-flortaucipir, 18 F-MK6240, 18 F-RO948, and 18 F-PI2620) bind amyloid and tau aggregates, respectively, formed in AD in the more advanced pathologic state (i.e., Braak stage ≥ IV) (Fleisher et al., 2020; Klunk et al., 2004; Groot et al., 2022; Ville-magne et al., 2018).”
BackgroundThe impact of demographic, clinical, genetic, and imaging variables on tau PET status
Ossenkoppele, R., Leuzy, A., Cho, H., Sudre, C. H., Strandberg, O. T., Smith, R. A., Palmqvist, S., Mattsson, N., Olsson, T., Jögi, J., et al. (2020) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-020-05099-w · Cited by 53 · see citing works
“The greater rates of tau PET–negative statuswith higher MMSE scores may be explained by the restricted sensitivity of both tau PET tracers [5, 6] that requires a significant pathological tau burden in order to cross the quantitative threshold [44], or by an inherent limitation of PET that requires a certain density of…”
BackgroundSelf-citationAbnormal tau in amyloid PET negative individuals
Yoon, B., Guo, T., Provost, K., Korman, D., Ward, T. J., Landau, S. M., & Jagust, W. J. (2021) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.09.019 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Groot, C., Smith, R. A., Stomrud, E., Binette, A. P., Leuzy, A., Wuestefeld, A., Wisse, L. E. M., Palmqvist, S., Mattsson, N., Janelidze, S., et al. (2022) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awac329 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“12 On the other hand, tau-PET ligands bind aggregated, insoluble paired helical filaments of tau 13,14 reflecting the pathological accumulation of tau aggregates, 15 and tau-PET shows particular sensitivity to tau pathology in later stages of Alzheimer’s disease.”
Long, J. M., Coble, D. W., Xiong, C., Schindler, S. E., Perrin, R. J., Gordon, B. A., Benzinger, T. L. S., Grant, E., Fagan, A. M., Harari, O., et al. (2022) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awac250 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Erickson, P., Simrén, J., Brum, W. S., Ennis, G. E., Kollmorgen, G., Suridjan, I., Langhough, R. E., Jonaitis, E. M., Hulle, C. A. V., Betthauser, T. J., et al. (2023) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.2338 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationCostoya‐Sánchez, A., Moscoso, A., Silva‐Rodríguez, J., Pontecorvo, M. J., Devous, M. D., Aguiar, P., Schöll, M., Grothe, M. J., Initiative, A. D. N., Weiner, M. W., et al. (2023) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.2560 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationDelmotte, K., Schaeverbeke, J. M., Poesen, K., & Vandenberghe, R. R. (2021) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-021-00817-4 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“only available for [(18)F]AV1451 at the moment [20].”
BackgroundSex differences in off-target binding using tau positron emission tomography
Smith, R. A., Strandberg, O. T., Leuzy, A., Betthauser, T. J., Johnson, S. C., Pereira, J. B., & Hansson, O. (2021) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102708 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Zagotenemab
Fleisher, A., Munsie, L. M., David, P., Andersen, S. W., Higgins, I. A., Hauck, P. M., Lo, A., Sims, J. R., Bryś, M., Mintun, M. A., et al. (2024) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000208061 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationKumar, R., Waisberg, E., Ong, J., Paladugu, P., Amiri, D., Saintyl, J., Yelamanchi, J., Nahouraii, R., Jagadeesan, R., & Tavakkoli, A. (2024) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci14121266 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Koychev, I., Hofer, M., & Friedman, N. (2020) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.119.230458 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“From a clinical perspective, a recent study showed a high degree of concordance between visually rated tau PET scans and the subsequent extent and topography of NFTs (55).”
Wolters, E. E., Dodich, A., Boccardi, M., Corre, J., Drzezga, A. E., Hansson, O., Nordberg, A. K., Frisoni, G. B., Garibotto, V., & Ossenkoppele, R. (2021) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-020-05118-w · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“[(18)F]Flortaucipir binds predominantly to paired helical filaments (PHFs) typically observed in AD [29, 68, 75, 126] and was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for detection of aggregated tau pathology by visual read in persons with suspected AD dementia [27].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMalpetti, M., Joie, R. L., & Rabinovici, G. D. (2022) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.121.263694 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Evaluation of a visual interpretation method for tau‐PET with 18 F‐flortaucipir
Sonni, I., Lesman‐Segev, O. H., Baker, S. L., Iaccarino, L., Korman, D., Rabinovici, G. D., Jagust, W. J., Landau, S. M., Joie, R. L., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2020) · Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring · doi:10.1002/dad2.12133 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Boccardi, M., Dodich, A., Albanese, E., Gayet‐Ageron, A., Festari, C., Ashton, N. J., Bischof, G. N., Chiotis, K., Leuzy, A., Wolters, E. E., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-020-05120-2 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“The 2020 update formally included the possibility to admit clinical progression as a reference standard also for Phase 2 (very few studies with pathology could be performed for tau imaging to date) [34].”
- Authors
- Fleisher, A. S., Pontecorvo, M. J., Devous, M. D., Lu, M., Arora, A. K., Truocchio, S. P., Aldea, P., Flitter, M., Locascio, T., Devine, M., Siderowf, A., Beach, T. G., Montine, T. J., Serrano, G. E., Curtis, C., Perrin, A., Salloway, S., Daniel, M., Wellman, C., Joshi, A. D., Irwin, D. J., Lowe, V. J., Seeley, W. W., Ikonomovic, M. D., Masdeu, J. C., Kennedy, I., Harris, T., Navitsky, M., Southekal, S., Mintun, M. A., & A16 Study Investigators
- Affiliations
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Banner Sun Health Research Institute (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Waypoint Research, Windermere, Florida
- Banner Alzheimer’s Institute (US)
- Butler Hospital (US)
- Pacific Research Network, San Diego, California
- Hospice of the Western Reserve (US)
- ImaginAb (United States) (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh
- Houston Methodist (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fleisher, Adam S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2020-07-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 829
- ISSN
- 2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7186920
- OpenAlex
- W3019122005
- Semantic Scholar
- 7bf74768a675a4bcb10a44e43a6c38000a6a1bea
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 68 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 30
- FWCI
- 42.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG034676, U01AG006786, P01AG066597, R01AG054449, R01AG011378, P30AG019610, R01AG041851, P01AG019724, P30AG062422, P50AG023501, P50AG016574)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS089544, R21NS094489, R01NS089757, R01NS097495)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- 18F-flortaucipir, Alzheimer's disease, tau PET imaging, postmortem neuropathology, Braak stages, amyloid plaques, diagnostic accuracy, immunohistochemistry, terminal illness, dementia, neurodegeneration biomarkers, amyloid PET, FDG-PET, neuroimaging validation
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Autopsy, Brain, Carbolines, Contrast Media, Female, Humans, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Neurofibrillary Tangles, tau Proteins, Radiopharmaceuticals, Positron-Emission Tomography, Plaque, Amyloid, Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review