Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dyskinesia after fetal cell transplantation for parkinsonism: A PET study

Ma, Yilong, Feigin, Andrew, Dhawan, Vijay, Fukuda, Masafumi, Shi, Qiuhu, Greene, Paul, Breeze, Robert, Fahn, Stanley, Freed, Curt, Eidelberg, David·2002·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Persistent dyskinesias in the absence of or with only minimal amounts of dopaminergic medication have been reported after dopamine cell implantation for Parkinson's disease. In this study, we used [18 F]fluorodopa (FDOPA) and positron emission tomography to determine whether this complication resulted from specific alterations in dopamine function after transplantation. Caudate and putamen FDOPA uptake values in these patients (DYS+, n = 5) were compared with those obtained in a cohort of age‐ and disease duration‐matched transplant recipients who did not develop this complication (DYS−, n = 12). PET signal for both groups was compared at baseline and at 12 and 24 months after transplantation. We found that putamen FDOPA uptake was significantly increased (p < 0.005) in DYS+ transplant recipients. These increases were predominantly localized to two zones within the left putamen. In addition to the posterodorsal zone in which a prominent reduction in FDOPA uptake was present at baseline, the DYS+ group also displayed a relative increase ventrally, in which preoperative dopaminergic input was relatively preserved. Postoperative FDOPA uptake did not reach supranormal values over the 24‐month follow‐up period. These findings suggest that unbalanced increases in dopaminergic function can complicate the outcome of neuronal transplantation for parkinsonism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.10359

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1056/NEJM200103083441002 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Greene PE, 1999, Severe spontaneous dyskinesias: a disabling complication of embryonic dopaminergic tissue implants in a subset of transplanted patients with advanced Parkinson's disease, Mov Disord, 14, 904
  3. 10.1038/87796 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/87798 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/ana.410380406 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/ana.410420115 · DOI
  7. 10.1001/archneur.56.2.179 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/ana.1075 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S1095-0397(98)00009-0 · DOI
  10. Ishikawa T, 1996, Clinical significance of striatal DOPA decarboxylase activity in Parkinson's disease, J Nucl Med, 37, 216
  11. Dhawan V, 2001, Comparative analysis of striatal FDOPA uptake in Parkinson's disease: SOR verses Ki, J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 21, S534
  12. 10.1056/NEJM198804073181402 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S1471-1931(00)00019-7 · DOI
  14. 10.1152/jn.1985.53.6.1417 · DOI
  15. 10.1212/WNL.55.3.377 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/mds.870090103 · DOI
  17. 10.1001/archneur.1978.00500290007002 · DOI
  18. Fahn S, 2000, The spectrum of levodopa‐induced dyskinesias, Ann Neurol, 47, S2
  19. 10.1152/jn.1985.53.6.1401 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/88362 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/nn863 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ma, Y., Feigin, A., Dhawan, V., Fukuda, M., Shi, Q., Greene, P., Breeze, R., Fahn, S., Freed, C., & Eidelberg, D.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-09-27
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
628-634
ISSN
  • 0364-5134
  • 1531-8249
Cited by
219
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review