The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New England medical center posterior circulation registry
Abstract
Among 407 New England Medical Center Posterior Circulation registry patients, 59% had strokes without transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), 24% had TIAs then strokes, and 16% had only TIAs. Embolism was the commonest stroke mechanism (40% of patients including 24% cardiac origin, 14% intraarterial, 2% cardiac and arterial sources). In 32% large artery occlusive lesions caused hemodynamic brain ischemia. Infarcts most often included the distal posterior circulation territory (rostral brainstem, superior cerebellum and occipital and temporal lobes); the proximal (medulla and posterior inferior cerebellum) and middle (pons and anterior inferior cerebellum) territories were equally involved. Severe occlusive lesions (>50% stenosis) involved more than one large artery in 148 patients; 134 had one artery site involved unilaterally or bilaterally. The commonest occlusive sites were: extracranial vertebral artery (52 patients, 15 bilateral) intracranial vertebral artery (40 patients, 12 bilateral), basilar artery (46 patients). Intraarterial embolism was the commonest mechanism of brain infarction in patients with vertebral artery occlusive disease. Thirty‐day mortality was 3.6%. Embolic mechanism, distal territory location, and basilar artery occlusive disease carried the poorest prognosis. The best outcome was in patients who had multiple arterial occlusive sites; they had position‐sensitive TIAs during months to years. Ann Neurol 2004;56:389–398
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The arterial lesions underlying lacunes
Fisher, C. M. (1969) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00685305 · Cited by 755
The subclavian steal phenomenon: A common vascular disorder with rare neurologic deficits
Hennerici, M., Klemm, C., & Rautenberg, W. (1988) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.38.5.669 · Cited by 235
Cited by
ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery diseases
Endorsed by: the European Stroke Organisation (ESO), Authors/Task Force Members, Tendera, M., Aboyans, V., Bartelink, M.-L., Baumgartner, I., Clément, D., Collet, J.-P., Cremonesi, A., De Carlo, M., et al. (2011) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr211 · Cited by 1,506
De Cocker, L. J. L., van Veluw, S. J., Fowkes, M., Luijten, P. R., Mali, W. P. T. M., & Hendrikse, J. (2013) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000353668 · Cited by 1,156
Savitz, S. I., & Caplan, L. R. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra041544 · Cited by 485
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Caplan, L. R., Wityk, R. J., Glass, T. A., Tapia, J., Pazdera, L., Chang, H., Teal, P., Dashe, J. F., Chaves, C. J., Breen, J. C., Vemmos, K., Amarenco, P., Tettenborn, B., Leary, M., Estol, C., Dewitt, L. D., & Pessin, M. S.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08-31
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 389-398
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2093432039
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New England medical center posterior circulation registry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.20204
- The paper
- Caplan, L. R., Wityk, R. J., Glass, T. A., Tapia, J., Pazdera, L., Chang, H., Teal, P., Dashe, J. F., Chaves, C. J., Breen, J. C., Vemmos, K., Amarenco, P., Tettenborn, B., Leary, M., Estol, C., Dewitt, L. D., & Pessin, M. S. (2004). New England medical center posterior circulation registry. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.