Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 351

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nogo‐A antibody improves regeneration and locomotion of spinal cord–injured rats

Liebscher, Thomas, Schnell, Lisa, Schnell, Dina, Scholl, Jeannette, Schneider, Regula, Gullo, Mirjam, Fouad, Karim, Mir, Anis, Rausch, Martin, Kindler, Diana, Hamers, Frank P. T., Schwab, Martin E.·2005·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Spinal cord trauma leads to loss of motor, sensory and autonomic functions below the lesion. Recovery is very restricted, due in part to neurite growth inhibitory myelin proteins, in particular Nogo‐A. Two neutralizing antibodies against Nogo‐A were used to study recovery and axonal regeneration after spinal cord lesions. Three months old Lewis rats were tested in sensory‐motor tasks (open field locomotion, crossing of ladder rungs and narrow beams, the CatWalk® runway, reactions to heat and von Frey hairs). A T‐shaped lesion was made at T8, and an intrathecal catheter delivered highly purified anti‐Nogo‐A monoclonal IgGs or unspecific IgGs for 2 weeks. A better outcome in motor behavior was obtained as early as two weeks after lesion in the animals receiving the Nogo‐A antibodies. Withdrawal responses to heat and mechanical stimuli were not different between the groups. Histology showed enhanced regeneration of corticospinal axons in the anti‐Nogo‐A antibody groups. fMRI revealed significant cortical responses to stimulation of the hindpaw exclusively in anti‐Nogo‐A animals. These results demonstrate that neutralization of the neurite growth inhibitor Nogo‐A by intrathecal antibodies leads to enhanced regeneration and reorganization of the injured CNS, resulting in improved recovery of compromised functions in the absence of dysfunctions. Ann Neurol 2005

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.20627

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 351

Metadata

Authors
Liebscher, T., Schnell, L., Schnell, D., Scholl, J., Schneider, R., Gullo, M., Fouad, K., Mir, A., Rausch, M., Kindler, D., Hamers, F. P. T., & Schwab, M. E.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09-19
Volume
58
Issue
5
Pages
706-719
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2035616055
Cited by
351
References
39
FWCI
12.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nogo‐A antibody improves regeneration and locomotion of spinal cord–injured rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.20627
The paper
Liebscher, T., Schnell, L., Schnell, D., Scholl, J., Schneider, R., Gullo, M., Fouad, K., Mir, A., Rausch, M., Kindler, D., Hamers, F. P. T., & Schwab, M. E. (2005). Nogo‐A antibody improves regeneration and locomotion of spinal cord–injured rats. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20627

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.