Mapping functional connectivity in patients with brain lesions
Open accessAbstract
Objective: The spatial distribution of functional connectivity between brain areas and the disturbance introduced by focal brain lesions are poorly understood. Based on the rationale that damaged brain tissue is disconnected from the physiological interactions among healthy areas, this study aimed to map the functionality of brain areas according to their connectivity with other areas. Methods: Magnetoencephalography recordings of spontaneous cortical activity during resting state were obtained from 15 consecutive patients with focal brain lesions and from 14 healthy control subjects. Neural activity in the brain was estimated using an adaptive spatial filtering technique. The mean imaginary coherence between brain voxels was then calculated as an index of functional connectivity. Results: Imaginary coherence was greatest in the alpha frequency range corresponding to the human cortical idling rhythm. In healthy subjects, functionally critical brain areas such as the somatosensory and language cortices had the highest alpha coherence. When compared with healthy control subjects, all lesion patients had diffuse or scattered brain areas with decreased alpha coherence. Patients with lesion‐induced neurological deficits displayed decreased connectivity estimates in the corresponding brain area compared with intact contralateral regions. In tumor patients without preoperative neurological deficits, brain areas showing decreased coherence could be surgically resected without the occurrence of postoperative deficits. Interpretation: Resting state coherence measured with magnetoencephalography is capable of mapping the functional connectivity of the brain, and can therefore offer valuable information for use in planning resective surgeries in patients with brain lesions, as well as investigations into structural‐functional relationships in healthy subjects. Ann Neurol 2007
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A specific pattern of preoperative network disruption predicted neurocognitive outcome.
“a specific pattern of preoperative network disruption was able to predict neurocognitive outcome.43”
From Graph theory analysis of complex brain networks: new concepts in brain mapping applied to neurosurgery (2016) · cites this paper as [43]
Networks are restored to a more organized state after surgery from a more disorganized preoperative state.
“Networks have been found to be restored to a more organized state after surgery from a more disorganized preoperative state.”
From Graph theory analysis of complex brain networks: new concepts in brain mapping applied to neurosurgery (2016) · cites this paper as [43]
Regions with decreased coherence could be resected without new deficits, while increased connectivity was associated with eloquent tissue.
“Regions that showed decreased coherence could be resected without new deficits appearing, while increased connectivity was associated with eloquent tissue.”
From Graph theory analysis of complex brain networks: new concepts in brain mapping applied to neurosurgery (2016) · cites this paper as [43]
Cites
Adaptive reconfiguration of fractal small-world human brain functional networks
Bassett, D. S., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Achard, S., Duke, T., & Bullmore, E. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0606005103 · Cited by 814 · see citing works
How do brain tumors alter functional connectivity? A magnetoencephalography study
Bartolomei, F., Bosma, I., Klein, M., Baayen, J. C., Reijneveld, J. C., Postma, T. J., Heimans, J. J., van Dijk, B. W., de Munck, J. C., de Jongh, A., et al. (2006) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.20710 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Measuring functional connectivity using MEG: methodology and comparison with fcMRI
Brookes, M. J., Hale, J. R., Zumer, J. M., Stevenson, C. M., Francis, S. T., Barnes, G. R., Owen, J. P., Morris, P. G., & Nagarajan, S. S. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.054 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Self-citationMcGirt, M. J., Chaichana, K. L., Attenello, F. J., Weingart, J. D., Than, K., Burger, P. C., Olivi, A., Brem, H., & Quinoñes-Hinojosa, A. (2008) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000325729.41085.73 · Cited by 533 · see citing works
Hillebrand, A., Barnes, G. R., Bosboom, J. L., Berendse, H. W., & Stam, C. J. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.005 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Electrophysiological Imaging of Brain Activity and Connectivity—Challenges and Opportunities
He, B., Yang, L., Wilke, C., & Yuan, H. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2011.2139210 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Global and regional functional connectivity maps of neural oscillations in focal epilepsy
Englot, D. J., Hinkley, L. B., Kort, N. S., Imber, B. S., Mizuiri, D., Honma, S. M., Findlay, A. M., Garrett, C., Cheung, P. L., Mantle, M., et al. (2015) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awv130 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Self-citationPrinciples of recovery from traumatic brain injury: Reorganization of functional networks
Castellanos, N. P., Leyva, I., Buldú, J. M., Bajo, R., Paúl, N., Cuesta, P., Ordóñez, V. E., Pascua, C. L., Boccaletti, S., Maestú, F., et al. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.046 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Fellrath, J., Mottaz, A., Schnider, A., Guggisberg, A. G., & Ptak, R. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.012 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationHart, M. G., Ypma, R. J. F., Romero-Garcia, R., Price, S. J., & Suckling, J. (2016) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2015.4.jns142683 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
- Authors
- Guggisberg, A. G., Honma, S. M., Findlay, A. M., Dalal, S. S., Kirsch, H. E., Berger, M. S., & Nagarajan, S. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Bern (CH)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Guggisberg, Adrian G.
- Nagarajan, Srikantan S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-203
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- PMC
- PMC3646715
- OpenAlex
- W1987577328
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 2.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC006435, R01DC004855)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS066654, R21NS076171)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- functional connectivity, focal brain lesions, alpha rhythm, somatosensory cortex, language cortex, adaptive spatial filtering, magnetoencephalography
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Brain Mapping, Brain Neoplasms, Cerebral Cortex, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Predictive Value of Tests, Preoperative Care, Retrospective Studies, Magnetoencephalography, Neurosurgical Procedures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review