The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Primary central nervous system vasculitis: analysis of 101 patients
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To analyze the clinical findings, response to therapy, outcome, and incidence of primary central nervous system vasculitis (PCNSV) in a large cohort from a single center Methods: We retrospectively studied 101 patients with PCNSV, selected by predetermined diagnostic criteria, who were seen during a 21‐year period. This was a collaborative study by five departments at a large multispecialty clinic. Clinical findings and outcomes were compared among patients categorized by method of diagnosis, response to therapy, survival, and degree of disability. An annual incidence rate was calculated Results: Seventy patients were diagnosed by angiography and 31 by central nervous system biopsy. Three histological patterns were observed during biopsy. Although most patients responded to therapy, an increased mortality rate was observed. Relapses occurred in one fourth of patients. Mortality rate and disability at last follow‐up were greater in those who presented with a focal neurological deficit, cognitive impairment, cerebral infarctions, and angiographic large‐vessel involvement but were lower in those with prominent gadolinium‐enhanced lesions when evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. The annual incidence rate of PCNSV was 2.4 cases per 1,000,000 person‐years Interpretation: PCNSV is a rare disease that may result in serious neurological outcomes or death. Angiography and brain biopsy may complement each other when determining the diagnosis. Early recognition and treatment may reduce poor outcomes. PCNSV is a variable syndrome that appears to consist of several subsets of heterogeneous diseases. Ann Neurol 2007
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scolding, N. J. (2005) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awh379 · Cited by 372
Cited by
Kleindorfer, D. O., Towfighi, A., Chaturvedi, S., Cockroft, K. M., Gutierrez, J., Lombardi-Hill, D., Kamel, H., Kernan, W. N., Kittner, S. J., Leira, E. C., et al. (2021) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000375 · Cited by 3,237
Self-citationPrimary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System
Birnbaum, J., & Hellmann, D. B. (2009) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2009.76 · Cited by 438
Hajj-Ali, R. A., Singhal, A. B., Benseler, S., Molloy, E., & Calabrese, L. H. (2011) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70081-3 · Cited by 323
Geschwind, M. D., Haman, A., & Miller, B. L. (2007) · Neurologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2007.04.001 · Cited by 143
The Emerging Link Between Autoimmune Disorders and Neuropsychiatric Disease
Kayser, M. S., & Dalmau, J. (2011) · Journal of Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.23.1.90 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Salvarani, C., Brown, R. D., Calamia, K. T., Christianson, T. J. H., Weigand, S. D., Miller, D. V., Giannini, C., Meschia, J. F., Huston, J., & Hunder, G. G.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-10-09
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 442-451
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2160881990
- Cited by
- 631
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primary central nervous system vasculitis: analysis of 101 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.21226
- The paper
- Salvarani, C., Brown, R. D., Calamia, K. T., Christianson, T. J. H., Weigand, S. D., Miller, D. V., Giannini, C., Meschia, J. F., Huston, J., & Hunder, G. G. (2007). Primary central nervous system vasculitis: analysis of 101 patients. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21226
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.