Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Placebo‐controlled trial of rituximab in IgM anti–myelin‐associated glycoprotein antibody demyelinating neuropathy

Dalakas, Marinos C., Rakocevic, Goran, Salajegheh, Mohammad, Dambrosia, James M., Hahn, Angelika F., Raju, Raghavan, McElroy, Beverly·2009·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: Report a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of rituximab in patients with anti–MAG demyelinating polyneuropathy (A‐MAG‐DP). Methods: Twenty‐six patients were randomized to four weekly infusions of 375mg/m 2 rituximab or placebo. Sample size was calculated to detect changes of ≥1 Inflammatory Neuropathy Course and Treatment (INCAT) leg disability scores at month 8. IgM levels, anti‐MAG titers, B cells, antigen‐presenting cells, and immunoregulatory T cells were monitored every 2 months. Results: Thirteen A‐MAG‐DP patients were randomized to rituximab and 13 to placebo. Randomization was balanced for age, electrophysiology, disease duration, disability scores, and baseline B cells. After 8 months, by intention to treat, 4 of 13 rituximab‐treated patients improved by ≥1 INCAT score compared with 0 of 13 patients taking placebo ( p = 0.096). Excluding one rituximab‐randomized patient who had normal INCAT score at entry, and thus could not improve, the results were significant ( p = 0.036). The time to 10m walk was significantly reduced in the rituximab group ( p = 0.042) (intention to treat). Clinically, walking improved in 7 of 13 rituximab‐treated patients. At month 8, IgM was reduced by 34% and anti‐MAG titers by 50%. CD25 + CD4 + Foxp3 + regulatory cells significantly increased by month 8. The most improved patients were those with high anti‐MAG titers and most severe sensory deficits at baseline. Interpretation: Rituximab is the first drug that improves some patients with A‐MAG‐DP in a controlled study. The benefit may be exerted by reducing the putative pathogenic antibodies or by inducing immunoregulatory T cells. The results warrant confirmation with a larger trial. Ann Neurol 2009;65:286–293

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.21577

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Metadata

Authors
Dalakas, M. C., Rakocevic, G., Salajegheh, M., Dambrosia, J. M., Hahn, A. F., Raju, R., & McElroy, B.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-03
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
286-293
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2146002808
Cited by
312
References
2
FWCI
15.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Placebo‐controlled trial of rituximab in IgM anti–myelin‐associated glycoprotein antibody demyelinating neuropathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.21577
The paper
Dalakas, M. C., Rakocevic, G., Salajegheh, M., Dambrosia, J. M., Hahn, A. F., Raju, R., & McElroy, B. (2009). Placebo‐controlled trial of rituximab in IgM anti–myelin‐associated glycoprotein antibody demyelinating neuropathy. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21577

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.