Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 563

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuromyelitis optica: Pathogenicity of patient immunoglobulin in vivo

Bradl, Monika, Misu, Tatsuro, Takahashi, Toshiyuki, Watanabe, Mitsutoshi, Mader, Simone, Reindl, Markus, Adzemovic, Milena, Bauer, Jan, Berger, Thomas, Fujihara, Kazuo, Itoyama, Yasuto, Lassmann, Hans·2009·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: Severe inflammation and astrocyte loss with profound demyelination in spinal cord and optic nerves are typical pathological features of neuromyelitis optica (NMO). A diagnostic hallmark of this disease is the presence of serum autoantibodies against the water channel aquaporin‐4 (AQP‐4) on astrocytes. Methods: We induced acute T‐cell–mediated experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in Lewis rats and confronted the animals with an additional application of immunoglobulins from AQP‐4 antibody–positive and –negative NMO patients, multiple sclerosis patients, and control subjects. Results: The immunoglobulins from AQP‐4 antibody–positive NMO patients are pathogenic. When they reach serum titers in experimental animals comparable with those seen in NMO patients, they augment clinical disease and induce lesions in the central nervous system that are similar in structure and distribution to those seen in NMO patients, consisting of AQP‐4 and astrocyte loss, granulocytic infiltrates, T cells and activated macrophages/microglia cells, and an extensive immunoglobulin and complement deposition on astrocyte processes of the perivascular and superficial glia limitans. AQP‐4 antibody containing NMO immunoglobulin injected into naïve rats, young rats with leaky blood–brain barrier, or after transfer of a nonencephalitogenic T‐cell line did not induce disease or neuropathological alterations in the central nervous system. Absorption of NMO immunoglobulins with AQP‐4–transfected cells, but not with mock‐transfected control cells, reduced the AQP‐4 antibody titers and was associated with a reduction of astrocyte pathology after transfer. Interpretation: Human anti–AQP‐4 antibodies are not only important in the diagnosis of NMO but also augment disease and induce NMO‐like lesions in animals with T‐cell–mediated brain inflammation. Ann Neurol 2009;66:630–643

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.21837

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 563

Metadata

Authors
Bradl, M., Misu, T., Takahashi, T., Watanabe, M., Mader, S., Reindl, M., Adzemovic, M., Bauer, J., Berger, T., Fujihara, K., Itoyama, Y., & Lassmann, H.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11
Volume
66
Issue
5
Pages
630-643
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2149429081
Cited by
563
References
1
FWCI
40.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuromyelitis optica: Pathogenicity of patient immunoglobulin in vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.21837
The paper
Bradl, M., Misu, T., Takahashi, T., Watanabe, M., Mader, S., Reindl, M., Adzemovic, M., Bauer, J., Berger, T., Fujihara, K., Itoyama, Y., & Lassmann, H. (2009). Neuromyelitis optica: Pathogenicity of patient immunoglobulin in vivo. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21837

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.