Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 514

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase define a form of limbic encephalitis

Malter, Michael P., Helmstaedter, Christoph, Urbach, Horst, Vincent, Angela, Bien, Christian G.·2010·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: Antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) have been described in a few patients with temporal lobe epilepsies consistent with limbic encephalitis (LE). We studied a cohort of patients with recent‐onset temporal lobe epilepsy caused by LE to test for GAD antibody positivity and response to immunotherapies. Methods: Over a period of 3.75 years, 138 patients aged ≥18 years investigated at the Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn, for recent‐onset epilepsy were prospectively collected and studied for cliniconeuroradiological features of LE, autoantibodies, and treatment responses. Results: Fifty‐three adult patients fulfilled the criteria for LE: (1) limbic signs and symptoms for ≤5 years and (2) brain MRI revealing mediotemporal encephalitis (T2/fluid attenuated inversion recovery hyperintensity without atrophy). Nine had high‐titer GAD antibodies; 10 had voltage‐gated potassium channel (VGKC) antibodies. Patients with GAD antibodies were younger (median age, 23 years; range, 17‐66 years) (p = 0.003) and presented with seizures only, whereas polymorphic limbic features were more common in the VGKC antibody‐positive group (p < 0.001). None had tumors. Patients with GAD antibodies more frequently had cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal bands (p = 0.009) and intrathecal secretion of the specific antibody (p = 0.01). Following monthly intravenous methylprednisolone pulses, GAD antibodies remained highly elevated in 6/6 patients, whereas VGKC antibodies normalized in 6/9 patients (p = 0.03). Despite more intense anticonvulsive treatment in the GAD antibody‐positive group (p = 0.01), none of these patients became seizure free, unlike all of the patients with VGKC antibodies (p < 0.001). Interpretation: High‐titer GAD antibodies define a form of nonparaneoplastic LE. This is a chronic, nonremitting disorder and should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with TLE and mediotemporal encephalitis. Therapeutic trials of other immunotherapies should be undertaken. ANN NEUROL 2010;67:470–478

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.21917

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 514

Metadata

Authors
Malter, M. P., Helmstaedter, C., Urbach, H., Vincent, A., & Bien, C. G.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
470-478
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W1983883744
Cited by
514
References
2
FWCI
12.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase define a form of limbic encephalitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.21917
The paper
Malter, M. P., Helmstaedter, C., Urbach, H., Vincent, A., & Bien, C. G. (2010). Antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase define a form of limbic encephalitis. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21917

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.