Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Seven‐tesla phase imaging of acute multiple sclerosis lesions: A new window into the inflammatory process

Open access
Absinta, Martina, Sati, Pascal, Gaitán, María I., Maggi, Pietro, Cortese, Irene C. M., Filippi, Massimo, Reich, Daniel S.·2013·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: In multiple sclerosis (MS), accurate, in vivo characterization of dynamic inflammatory pathological changes occurring in newly forming lesions could have major implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and mechanisms of tissue destruction. Here, we investigated the potential of ultrahigh‐field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; 7T), particularly phase imaging combined with dynamic contrast enhancement, to provide new insights in acute MS lesions. Methods: Sixteen active MS patients were studied at 7T. Noncontrast, high‐resolution T2* magnitude and phase scans, T1 scans before/after gadolinium contrast injection, and dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) T1 scans were acquired. T2*/phase features and DCE pattern were determined for acute and chronic lesions. When possible, 1‐year follow‐up 7T MRI was performed. Results: Of 49 contrast‐enhancing lesions, 44 could be analyzed. Centrifugal DCE lesions appeared isointense or hypointense on phase images, whereas centripetal DCE lesions showed thin, hypointense phase rims that clearly colocalized with the initial site of contrast enhancement. This pattern generally disappeared once enhancement resolved. Conversely, in 43 chronic lesions also selected for the presence of hypointense phase rims, the findings were stable over time, and the rims were typically thicker and darker. These considerations suggest different underlying pathological processes in the 2 lesion types. Interpretation: Ultrahigh‐field MRI and, especially, phase contrast, are highly sensitive to tissue changes in acute MS lesions, which differ from the patterns seen in chronic lesions. In acute lesions, the hypointense phase rim reflects the expanding inflammatory edge and may directly correspond to inflammatory byproducts and sequelae of blood–brain barrier opening. Ann Neurol 2013;74:669–678

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.23959

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Absinta, M., Sati, P., Gaitán, M. I., Maggi, P., Cortese, I. C. M., Filippi, M., & Reich, D. S.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09-16
Volume
74
Issue
5
Pages
669-678
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W1578762211
Cited by
166
References
5
FWCI
9.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seven‐tesla phase imaging of acute multiple sclerosis lesions: A new window into the inflammatory process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.23959
The paper
Absinta, M., Sati, P., Gaitán, M. I., Maggi, P., Cortese, I. C. M., Filippi, M., & Reich, D. S. (2013). Seven‐tesla phase imaging of acute multiple sclerosis lesions: A new window into the inflammatory process. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.23959

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.