The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Seven‐tesla phase imaging of acute multiple sclerosis lesions: A new window into the inflammatory process
Open accessAbstract
Objective: In multiple sclerosis (MS), accurate, in vivo characterization of dynamic inflammatory pathological changes occurring in newly forming lesions could have major implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and mechanisms of tissue destruction. Here, we investigated the potential of ultrahigh‐field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; 7T), particularly phase imaging combined with dynamic contrast enhancement, to provide new insights in acute MS lesions. Methods: Sixteen active MS patients were studied at 7T. Noncontrast, high‐resolution T2* magnitude and phase scans, T1 scans before/after gadolinium contrast injection, and dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) T1 scans were acquired. T2*/phase features and DCE pattern were determined for acute and chronic lesions. When possible, 1‐year follow‐up 7T MRI was performed. Results: Of 49 contrast‐enhancing lesions, 44 could be analyzed. Centrifugal DCE lesions appeared isointense or hypointense on phase images, whereas centripetal DCE lesions showed thin, hypointense phase rims that clearly colocalized with the initial site of contrast enhancement. This pattern generally disappeared once enhancement resolved. Conversely, in 43 chronic lesions also selected for the presence of hypointense phase rims, the findings were stable over time, and the rims were typically thicker and darker. These considerations suggest different underlying pathological processes in the 2 lesion types. Interpretation: Ultrahigh‐field MRI and, especially, phase contrast, are highly sensitive to tissue changes in acute MS lesions, which differ from the patterns seen in chronic lesions. In acute lesions, the hypointense phase rim reflects the expanding inflammatory edge and may directly correspond to inflammatory byproducts and sequelae of blood–brain barrier opening. Ann Neurol 2013;74:669–678
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
Inflammatory cortical demyelination in early multiple sclerosis.
Lucchinetti, C. F., Popescu, B. F. G., Bunyan, R. F., Moll, N. M., Roemer, S. F., Lassmann, H., Brück, W., Parisi, J. E., Scheithauer, B. W., Giannini, C., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1100648 · Cited by 1,103
Katz, D., Taubenberger, J. K., Cannella, B., McFarlin, D. E., Raine, C. S., & McFarland, H. F. (1993) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410340507 · Cited by 387
Tracking iron in multiple sclerosis: a combined imaging and histopathological study at 7 Tesla
Bagnato, F., Hametner, S., Yao, B., van Gelderen, P., Merkle, H., Cantor, F. K., Lassmann, H., & Duyn, J. H. (2011) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awr278 · Cited by 351
Evolution of the blood–brain barrier in newly forming multiple sclerosis lesions
Gaitán, M. I., Shea, C. D., Evangelou, I. E., Stone, R. D., Fenton, K. M., Bielekova, B., Massacesi, L., & Reich, D. S. (2011) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.22472 · Cited by 174
Self-citation
Cited by
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria
Thompson, A. J., Banwell, B. L., Barkhof, F., Carroll, W. M., Coetzee, T., Comi, G., Correale, J., Fazekas, F., Filippi, M., Freedman, M. S., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30470-2 · Cited by 8,167
Self-citationMRI criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines
Filippi, M., Rocca, M. A., Ciccarelli, O., De Stefano, N., Evangelou, N., Kappos, L., Rovira, A., Sastre-Garriga, J., Tintorè, M., Frederiksen, J. L., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00393-2 · Cited by 880
Self-citationProgressive multiple sclerosis: from pathogenic mechanisms to treatment
Correale, J., Gaitán, M. I., Ysrraelit, M. C., & Fiol, M. P. (2016) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aww258 · Cited by 573
Self-citationDiagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2024 revisions of the McDonald criteria
Montalban, X., Lebrun-Frénay, C., Oh, J., Arrambide, G., Moccia, M., Pia Amato, M., Amezcua, L., Banwell, B., Bar-Or, A., Barkhof, F., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(25)00270-4 · Cited by 551
Self-citationAssociation of Chronic Active Multiple Sclerosis Lesions With Disability In Vivo
Absinta, M., Sati, P., Masuzzo, F., Nair, G., Sethi, V., Kolb, H., Ohayon, J., Wu, T., Cortese, I. C. M., & Reich, D. S. (2019) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2399 · Cited by 534
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Absinta, M., Sati, P., Gaitán, M. I., Maggi, P., Cortese, I. C. M., Filippi, M., & Reich, D. S.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-09-16
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 669-678
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W1578762211
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seven‐tesla phase imaging of acute multiple sclerosis lesions: A new window into the inflammatory process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.23959
- The paper
- Absinta, M., Sati, P., Gaitán, M. I., Maggi, P., Cortese, I. C. M., Filippi, M., & Reich, D. S. (2013). Seven‐tesla phase imaging of acute multiple sclerosis lesions: A new window into the inflammatory process. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.23959
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.