Cited by 120Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mild to moderate Alzheimer dementia with insufficient neuropathological changes

Open access

Abstract

Recently, ~16% of participants in an anti-Aβ passive immunotherapy trial for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease (AD) had a negative baseline amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scan. Whether they have AD or are AD clinical phenocopies remains unknown. We examined the 2005-2013 National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center autopsy database and found that ~14% of autopsied subjects clinically diagnosed with mild-to-moderate probable AD have no or sparse neuritic plaques, which would expectedly yield a negative amyloid PET scan. More than half of these "Aβ-negative" subjects have low neurofibrillary tangle Braak stages. These findings support the implementation of a positive amyloid biomarker as an inclusion criterion in future anti-Aβ drug trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.24125

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 23 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–120 of 120

Metadata

Authors
Serrano‐Pozo, A., Qian, J., Monsell, S. E., Blacker, D., Gómez‐Isla, T., Betensky, R. A., Growdon, J. H., Johnson, K. A., Frosch, M. P., Sperling, R. A., & Hyman, B. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Hyman, Bradley T.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04
Volume
75
Issue
4
Pages
597-601
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2171032841
Cited by
120
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3
FWCI
8.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (P50 AG0001534, U01AG016976, P50AG005134, P30AG062421)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, amyloid PET, neuritic plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, Braak stages, neuropathology, trial inclusion criteria
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Autopsy, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Status Schedule, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review