Cited by 981Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Consensus Recommendations for the Postmortem Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease

Open access
The National Institute on Aging and Reagan Institute Working Group on Diagnostic Criteria for the Neuropathological Assessment of Alzheimer’s Disease·1997·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

This report summarizes the consensus recommendations of a panel of neuropathologists from the United States and Europe to improve the postmortem diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease. The recommendations followed from a two-day workshop sponsored by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) and the Ronald and Nancy Reagan Institute of the Alzheimer’s Association to reassess the original NIA criteria for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease published in 1985 [2] . The consensus recommendations for improving the neuropathological criteria for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease are reported here, and the “position papers” by members of the Working Group that accompany this report elaborate on the research findings and concepts upon which these recommendations were based. Further, commentaries by other experts in the field also are included here to provide additional perspectives on these recommendations. Finally, it is anticipated that future meetings of the Working Group will reassess these recommendations and the implementation of postmortem diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0197-4580(97)00057-2

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
The National Institute on Aging and Reagan Institute Working Group on Diagnostic Criteria for the Neuropathological Assessment of Alzheimer’s Disease
Corresponding author
The National Institute on Aging and Reagan Institute Working Group on Diagnostic Criteria for the Neuropathological Assessment of Alzheimer’s Disease
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-07
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
S1-S2
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2725718031
Cited by
981
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 42
FWCI
13.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, postmortem diagnosis, consensus recommendations, neuropathology, diagnostic criteria revision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review