Cited by 100

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In vivo evidence of glutamate toxicity in multiple sclerosis

Azevedo, Christina J., Kornak, John, Chu, Philip, Sampat, Mehul, Okuda, Darin T., Cree, Bruce A., Nelson, Sarah J., Hauser, Stephen L., Pelletier, Daniel·2014·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: There is increasing evidence that altered glutamate (Glu) homeostasis is involved in the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo effects of excess brain Glu on neuroaxonal integrity measured by N‐acetylaspartate (NAA), brain volume, and clinical outcomes in a large, prospectively followed cohort of MS subjects. Methods: We used multivoxel spectroscopy at 3T to longitudinally estimate Glu and NAA concentrations from large areas of normal‐appearing white and gray matter (NAWM and GM) in MS patients (n = 343) with a mean follow‐up time of 5 years. Using linear mixed‐effects models, Glu was examined as a predictor of NAA decline, annualized percentage brain volume change, and evolution of clinical outcomes (Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite [MSFC], Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test‐3 [PASAT], and Expanded Disability Status Scale). Glu/NAA ratio was tested as a predictor of brain volume loss and clinical outcomes. Results: Baseline Glu [NAWM] was predictive of accelerated longitudinal decline in NAA [GM] (−0.06mM change in NAA [GM] /yr for each unit increase in Glu; p = 0.004). The sustained elevation of Glu [NAWM] was predictive of a loss of 0.28mM/yr in NAA [NAWM] ( p < 0.001) and 0.15mM/yr in NAA [GM] ( p = 0.056). Each 10% increase in Glu/NAA [NAWM] was associated with a loss of 0.33% brain volume/yr ( p = 0.001), 0.009 standard deviations/yr in MSFC z ‐score ( p < 0.001), and 0.17 points/yr on the PASAT ( p < 0.001). Interpretation: These results indicate that higher Glu concentrations increase the rate of NAA decline, and higher Glu/NAA [NAWM] ratio increases the rate of decline of brain volume, MSFC, and PASAT. This provides evidence of a relationship between brain Glu and markers of disease progression in MS. Ann Neurol 2014;76:269–278

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.24202

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1002/glia.20275 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/ana.1077 · DOI
  3. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000090564.88719.37 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/brain/awg179 · DOI
  5. 10.1001/archneur.60.8.1082 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1046/j.1365-2362.1997.2250774.x · DOI
  7. 10.1093/hmg/ddp120 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/71555 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/71548 · DOI
  10. 10.1155/MI/2006/93684 · DOI
  11. 10.1172/JCI33464 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/mrm.20007 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/ana.10052 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/brain/awh467 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.048 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/brain/awq192 · DOI
  17. 10.1136/jnnp‐2013‐306662 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0730-725X(02)00533-7 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/ana.20703 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1212/WNL.46.4.907 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1109/42.906424 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/mrm.1910360106 · DOI
  24. 10.1006/nimg.2002.1040 · DOI
  25. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a609f8 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/brain/awn301 · DOI
  27. 10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1002/ana.410420318 · DOI
  29. McCulloch CE, 2008, Generalized, linear, and mixed models
  30. 10.1002/sim.1909 · DOI
  31. 10.1136/bmj.324.7348.1271 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.09.005 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/jnr.490410209 · DOI
  34. Merrill JE, 1993, Microglial cell cytotoxicity of oligodendrocytes is mediated through nitric oxide, J Immunol, 151, 2132, 10.4049/jimmunol.151.4.2132 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0022-510X(00)00343-9 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/0022-510X(79)90142-4 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/0304-3940(91)90559-C · DOI
  38. 10.1002/ana.21533 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/ana.21539 · DOI
  40. 10.1212/WNL.54.3.552 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.mri.2009.06.008 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/s00415-005-0964-z · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 100

Metadata

Authors
Azevedo, C. J., Kornak, J., Chu, P., Sampat, M., Okuda, D. T., Cree, B. A., Nelson, S. J., Hauser, S. L., & Pelletier, D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Neurology Yale University New Haven CT
  • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of California San Francisco San Francisco, CA
  • Department of Medicine University of California San Francisco San Francisco, CA
  • Department of Neurology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX
  • Department of Neurology University of California San Francisco San Francisco, CA
  • Department of Radiology University of California San Francisco San Francisco, CA
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-09
Volume
76
Issue
2
Pages
269-278
ISSN
  • 0364-5134
  • 1531-8249
Cited by
100
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • Biogen-Idec
  • GlaxoSmithKline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review