Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preservation of electroencephalographic organization in patients with impaired consciousness and imaging‐based evidence of command‐following

Open access
Forgacs, Peter B., Conte, Mary M., Fridman, Esteban A., Voss, Henning U., Victor, Jonathan D., Schiff, Nicholas D.·2014·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: Standard clinical characterization of patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) relies on observation of motor output and may therefore lead to the misdiagnosis of vegetative state or minimally conscious state in patients with preserved cognition. We used conventional electroencephalographic (EEG) measures to assess a cohort of DOC patients with and without functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)‐based evidence of command‐following, and correlated the findings with standard clinical behavioral evaluation and brain metabolic activity. Methods: We enrolled 44 patients with severe brain injury. Behavioral diagnosis was established using standardized clinical assessments. Long‐term EEG recordings were analyzed to determine wakeful background organization and presence of elements of sleep architecture. A subset of patients had fMRI testing of command‐following using motor imagery paradigms (26 patients) and resting brain metabolism measurement using 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (31 patients). Results: All 4 patients with fMRI evidence of covert command‐following consistently demonstrated well‐organized EEG background during wakefulness, spindling activity during sleep, and relative preservation of cortical metabolic activity. In the entire cohort, EEG organization and overall brain metabolism showed no significant association with bedside behavioral testing, except in a few cases when EEG was severely abnormal. Interpretation: These findings suggest that conventional EEG is a simple strategy that complements behavioral and imaging characterization of DOC patients. Preservation of specific EEG features may be used to assess the likelihood of unrecognized cognitive abilities in severely brain‐injured patients with very limited or no motor responses. Ann Neurol 2014;76:869–879

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.24283

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Forgacs, P. B., Conte, M. M., Fridman, E. A., Voss, H. U., Victor, J. D., & Schiff, N. D.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10-24
Volume
76
Issue
6
Pages
869-879
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W1958363885
Cited by
165
References
4
FWCI
11.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preservation of electroencephalographic organization in patients with impaired consciousness and imaging‐based evidence of command‐following. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.24283
The paper
Forgacs, P. B., Conte, M. M., Fridman, E. A., Voss, H. U., Victor, J. D., & Schiff, N. D. (2014). Preservation of electroencephalographic organization in patients with impaired consciousness and imaging‐based evidence of command‐following. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24283

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.