Cited by 101Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

Longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging in frontotemporal dementia

Open access
Mahoney, Colin J., Simpson, Ivor J. A., Nicholas, Jennifer M., Fletcher, Phillip D., Downey, Laura E., Golden, Hannah L., Clark, Camilla N., Schmitz, Nicole +6 more·2015·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: Novel biomarkers for monitoring progression in neurodegenerative conditions are needed. Measurement of microstructural changes in white matter (WM) using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) may be a useful outcome measure. Here we report trajectories of WM change using serial DTI in a cohort with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Methods: Twenty‐three patients with bvFTD (12 having genetic mutations), and 18 age‐matched control participants were assessed using DTI and neuropsychological batteries at baseline and ∼1.3 years later. Baseline and follow‐up DTI scans were registered using a groupwise approach. Annualized rates of change for DTI metrics, neuropsychological measures, and whole brain volume were calculated. DTI metric performances were compared, and sample sizes for potential clinical trials were calculated. Results: In the bvFTD group as a whole, rates of change in fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) within the right paracallosal cingulum were greatest (FA: −6.8%/yr, p < 0.001; MD: 2.9%/yr, p = 0.01). MAPT carriers had the greatest change within left uncinate fasciculus (FA: −7.9%/yr, p < 0.001; MD: 10.9%/yr, p < 0.001); sporadic bvFTD and C9ORF72 carriers had the greatest change within right paracallosal cingulum (sporadic bvFTD, FA: −6.7%/yr, p < 0.001; MD: 3.8%/yr, p = 0.001; C9ORF72 , FA: −6.8%/yr, p = 0.004). Sample size estimates using FA change were substantially lower than neuropsychological or whole brain measures of change. Interpretation: Serial DTI scans may be useful for measuring disease progression in bvFTD, with particular trajectories of WM damage emerging. Sample size calculations suggest that longitudinal DTI may be a useful biomarker in future clinical trials. ANN NEUROL 2015;77:33–46

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.24296

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mahoney, C. J., Simpson, I. J. A., Nicholas, J. M., Fletcher, P. D., Downey, L. E., Golden, H. L., Clark, C. N., Schmitz, N., Rohrer, J. D., Schott, J. M., Zhang, H., Ourselin, S., Warren, J. D., & Fox, N. C.
Affiliations
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Dementia Research Centre UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London London United Kingdom
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-11-17
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
33-46
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W1556842271
Cited by
101
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (G0801306)
  • Wellcome Trust (091673/Z/10/Z)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, white matter microstructure, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, disease progression biomarkers, uncinate fasciculus, genetic frontotemporal dementia, sample size determination, clinical trial outcome measures
MeSH terms
Aged, Brain, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Case-Control Studies, Anisotropy, Disease Progression, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Frontotemporal Dementia, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review