The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of brain age suggests accelerated atrophy after traumatic brain injury
Open accessAbstract
Objective: The long‐term effects of traumatic brain injury (TBI) can resemble observed in normal ageing, suggesting that TBI may accelerate the ageing process. We investigate this using a neuroimaging model that predicts brain age in healthy individuals and then apply it to TBI patients. We define individuals' differences in chronological and predicted structural "brain age," and test whether TBI produces progressive atrophy and how this relates to cognitive function. Methods: A predictive model of normal ageing was defined using machine learning in 1,537 healthy individuals, based on magnetic resonance imaging–derived estimates of gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM). This ageing model was then applied to test 99 TBI patients and 113 healthy controls to estimate brain age. Results: The initial model accurately predicted age in healthy individuals ( r = 0.92). TBI brains were estimated to be "older," with a mean predicted age difference (PAD) between chronological and estimated brain age of 4.66 years (±10.8) for GM and 5.97 years (±11.22) for WM. This PAD predicted cognitive impairment and correlated strongly with the time since TBI, indicating that brain tissue loss increases throughout the chronic postinjury phase. Interpretation: TBI patients' brains were estimated to be older than their chronological age. This discrepancy increases with time since injury, suggesting that TBI accelerates the rate of brain atrophy. This may be an important factor in the increased susceptibility in TBI patients for dementia and other age‐associated conditions, motivating further research into the age‐like effects of brain injury and other neurological diseases. Ann Neurol 2015;77:571–581
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition
Salthouse, T. A. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.403 · Cited by 5,902 · cited 2×
“information processing speed measures, and impairments in this domain have been posited as central to the cognitive decline associated with typical ageing.(20) The nature of our sample did not permit an exhaustive examination of TBI-related and age-related cognitive dysfunction; however, our interpretation of results…”
BackgroundResultMapping cortical change across the human life span
Sowell, E. R., Peterson, B. S., Thompson, P. M., Welcome, S. E., Henkenius, A. L., & Toga, A. W. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1008 · Cited by 2,328
Insights into the ageing mind: a view from cognitive neuroscience
Hedden, T., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1323 · Cited by 2,223
Inflammation after trauma: Microglial activation and traumatic brain injury
Ramlackhansingh, A. F., Brooks, D. J., Greenwood, R. J., Bose, S. K., Turkheimer, F. E., Kinnunen, K. M., Gentleman, S., Heckemann, R. A., Gunanayagam, K., Gelosa, G., et al. (2011) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.22455 · Cited by 999
Self-citationChronic neuropathologies of single and repetitive TBI: substrates of dementia?
Smith, D. H., Johnson, V. E., & Stewart, W. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2013.29 · Cited by 699
Widespread tau and amyloid-beta pathology many years after a single traumatic brain injury in humans
Johnson, V. E., Stewart, W., & Smith, D. H. (2012) · Brain Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.2011.00513.x · Cited by 620
Neuroanatomical Assessment of Biological Maturity
Brown, T. T., Kuperman, J. M., Chung, Y., Erhart, M., McCabe, C., Hagler, D. J., Venkatraman, V. K., Akshoomoff, N., Amaral, D. G., Bloss, C. S., et al. (2012) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.002 · Cited by 332
Cited by
Cole, J. H., Poudel, R. P. K., Tsagkrasoulis, D., Caan, M. W. A., Steves, C., Spector, T. D., & Montana, G. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.059 · Cited by 872
Self-citationAlbizu, A., Fang, R., Indahlastari, A., O’Shea, A., Stolte, S. E., See, K. B., Boutzoukas, E. M., Kraft, J. N., Nissim, N. R., & Woods, A. J. (2020) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2020.10.001 · Cited by 79
A federated learning architecture for secure and private neuroimaging analysis
Stripelis, D., Gupta, U., Saleem, H., Dhinagar, N., Ghai, T., Anastasiou, C., Sánchez, R., Steeg, G. V., Ravi, S., Naveed, M., et al. (2024) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2024.101031 · Cited by 31
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Affects Orexin/Hypocretin Physiology Differently in Male and Female Mice
Somach, R. T., Jean, I. D., Farrugia, A. M., & Cohen, A. S. (2023) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2023.0125 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Cole, J. H., Leech, R., Sharp, D. J., & Initiative, F. T. A. D. N.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-03-25
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 571-581
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2137229374
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 13.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of brain age suggests accelerated atrophy after traumatic brain injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.24367
- The paper
- Cole, J. H., Leech, R., Sharp, D. J., & Initiative, F. T. A. D. N. (2015). Prediction of brain age suggests accelerated atrophy after traumatic brain injury. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24367
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.