Cited by 2,223Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Functions and Memory

Insights into the ageing mind: a view from cognitive neuroscience

Hedden, Trey, Gabrieli, John D. E.·2004·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn1323

Cites

158 of 158 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hedden, T., & Gabrieli, J. D. E.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Hedden, Trey
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2004-02
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
87-96
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2171776652
Cited by
2,223
References
148
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 142 · 2020: 133 · 2019: 141 · 2018: 124 · 2017: 134 · 2016: 132 · 2015: 127 · 2014: 118 · 2013: 123 · 2012: 114
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
cognitive aging, age-related memory decline, cognitive slowing, prefrontal cortex, medial temporal lobe, white matter tracts
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Atrophy, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Memory Disorders, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Neural Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review