The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regional cerebral blood flow and glucose metabolism following transient forebrain ischemia
Abstract
Progressive brain damage after transient cerebral ischemia may be related to changes in postischemic cerebral blood flow and metabolism. Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and cerebral glucose utilization (rCGU) were measured in adult rats prior to, during (only rCBF), and serially after transient forebrain ischemia. Animals were subjected to 30 minutes of forebrain ischemia by occluding both common carotid arteries 24 hours after cauterizing the vertebral arteries. Regional CBF was measured by the indicator‐fractionation technique using 4‐iodo‐[14 C]‐antipyrine. Regional CGU was measured by the 2‐[14 C]deoxyglucose method. The results were correlated with the distribution and progression of ischemic neuronal damage in animals subjected to an identical ischemic insult. Cerebral blood flow to forebrain after 30 minutes of moderate to severe ischemia ( < 10% control CBF) was characterized by 5 to 15 minutes of hyperemia; rCBF then fell below normal and remained low for as long as 24 hours. Postischemic glucose utilization in the forebrain, except in the hippocampus, was depressed below control values at 1 hour and either remained low (neocortex, striatum) or gradually rose to normal (white matter) by 48 hours. In the hippocampus, glucose utilization equaled the control value at 1 hour and fell below control between 24 and 48 hours. The appearance of moderate to severe morphological damage in striatum and hippocampus coincided with a late rise of rCBF above normal and with a fall of rCGU; the late depression of rCGU was usually preceded by a period during which metabolism was increased relative to adjacent tissue. Further refinement of these studies may help identify salvageable brain after ischemia and define ways to manipulate CBF and metabolism in the treatment of stroke.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sokoloff, L., Reivich, M., Kennedy, C., Rosiers, M. H. D., Patlak, C. S., Pettigrew, K. D., Sakurada, O., & Shinohara, M. (1977) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1977.tb10649.x · Cited by 6,000
Cited by
Ischemic Cell Death in Brain Neurons
Lipton, P. (1999) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1999.79.4.1431 · Cited by 3,043
Calcium in Ischemic Cell Death
Kristián, T., & Siesjö, B. K. (1998) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.29.3.705 · Cited by 825
Rodent models of cerebral ischemia.
Ginsberg, M. D., & Busto, R. (1989) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.20.12.1627 · Cited by 659
Cerebral circulation and metabolism
Siesjö, B. K. (1984) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1984.60.5.0883 · Cited by 585
Selective vulnerability in the gerbil hippocampus following transient ischemia
Kirino, T., & Sano, K. (1984) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00691853 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Pulsinelli, W. A., Levy, D. E., & Duffy, T. E.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-05
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 499-509
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2121306155
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regional cerebral blood flow and glucose metabolism following transient forebrain ischemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410110510
- The paper
- Pulsinelli, W. A., Levy, D. E., & Duffy, T. E. (1982). Regional cerebral blood flow and glucose metabolism following transient forebrain ischemia. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410110510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.