Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PET scan investigations of Huntington's disease: Cerebral metabolic correlates of neurological features and functional decline

Young, Anne B., Penney, John B., Starosta‐Rubinstein, Simon, Markel, Dorene S., Berent, Stanley, Giordani, Bruno, Ehrenkaufer, Richard, Jewett, Douglas, Hichwa, Richard·1986·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Fifteen drug‐free patients with early to midstage Huntington's disease were evaluated with quantitative neurological examinations, scales for functional capacity, computed tomographic (CT) scans, and positron emission tomographic (PET) scans of 18 F‐2‐fluoro‐2‐deoxyglucose (18 F‐FDG) uptake. All patients had abnormal indices of caudate metabolism on PET scanning, whereas in patients with early disease indices of putamen metabolism and CT measures of caudate atrophy were normal. Indices of caudate metabolism correlated highly with the patients' overall functional capacity (r = 0.906; p < 0.001) and bradykinesia/rigidity (r = −0.692; p < 0.01). Indices of putamen metabolism correlated highly with motor functions: Chorea (r = −0.841; p < 0.01), oculomotor abnormalities (r = −0.849; p < 0.01), and fine motor coordination (r = −0.866; p < 0.01). Indices of thalamic metabolism correlated positively with dystonia (r = 0.559; p < 0.05). The data suggest that PET scanning with 18 F‐FDG is a sensitive measure of brain dysfunction in Huntington's disease and that basal ganglia metabolism is highly correlated with the overall functional capacity of individual patients and with the degree of their motor abnormalities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410200305

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1212/WNL.28.11.1196 · DOI
  2. BerentS GiordaniB YoungAB et al: Positron emission tomography (PET) of18F‐2‐fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose (18FDG) uptake in the area of the caudate nucleus of patients with Huntington's disease: findings with the Wechsler Memory Scale. International Neuropsychological Society Bulletin November 1984 p5
  3. Bruyn GW, 1968, Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 298
  4. Butters N, 1979, Advances in Neurology, 203
  5. 10.1001/archneur.1978.00500330033006 · DOI
  6. 10.1212/WNL.26.1.64 · DOI
  7. Folstein SE, 1983, The measurement of abnormal movement: methods developed for Huntington's disease, Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol, 5, 605
  8. 10.1002/9780470720882.ch7 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.6089346 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/306234a0 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/978-1-4471-1308-9 · DOI
  12. Kuhl DE, 1985, Brain Imaging and Brain Functions, 199
  13. 10.1002/ana.410150723 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/ana.410120504 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Lange HW, 1981, Quantitative changes of telencephalon, diencephalon and mesencephalon in Huntington's chorea, postencephalitic and idiopathic parkinsonism, Verh Anat Ges, 75, 923
  16. 10.1212/WNL.34.8.1059 · DOI
  17. Matsui T, 1978, An Atlas of the Human Brain for Computerized Tomography
  18. 10.1002/ana.410120505 · DOI
  19. Mazziotta JC, 1984, Cerebral metabolic responses to complex motor tasks: normal subjects versus patients with Huntington's disease, Soc Neurosci Abstr, 10, 523
  20. 10.1146/annurev.ne.06.030183.000445 · DOI
  21. Penney JB, 1984, Positron emission tomographic. (PET) scanning in Huntington's disease: studies of 18F‐2‐fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose [18F‐FDG] uptake in 12 drugfree cases, Soc Neurosci Abstracts, 10, 994
  22. 10.1002/ana.410060502 · DOI
  23. 10.1126/science.2860723 · DOI
  24. Sanberg PR, 1984, Scientific approaches to Huntington's disease, CRC Crit Rev Clin Neurobiol, 1, 1
  25. 10.3109/00207458308985874 · DOI
  26. 10.1212/WNL.31.10.1333 · DOI
  27. Shoulson I, 1982, Movement Disorders (International Medical Review Series), 277
  28. 10.1016/S0733-8619(18)31088-0 · DOI
  29. Shoulson I, 1982, Huntington's disease: caudate atrophy parallels functional impairment, Neurology (NY), 32, A143
  30. Sokoloff L, 1981, The relationship between function and energy metabolism: its use in the localization of functional activity in the nervous system, Neurosci Res Program Bull, 19, 159
  31. 10.1007/BF00328198 · DOI
  32. 10.1097/00005072-198511000-00003 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/S0733-8619(18)31082-X · DOI
  34. 10.1212/WNL.36.2.244 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Young, A. B., Penney, J. B., Starosta‐Rubinstein, S., Markel, D. S., Berent, S., Giordani, B., Ehrenkaufer, R., Jewett, D., & Hichwa, R.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-09
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
296-303
ISSN
  • 0364-5134
  • 1531-8249
Cited by
218
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review