The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neuropathological Classification of Huntingtonʼs Disease
Abstract
In postmortem brain specimens from 163 clinically diagnosed cases of Huntington's disease (HD) the striatum exhibited marked variation in the severity of neuropathological involvement. A system for grading this severity was established by macroscopic and microscopic criteria, resulting in five grades (0-4) designated in ascending order of severity. The grade correlates closely with the extent of clinical disability as assessed by a rating scale. In five cases of clinically diagnosed HD there were no discernible neuropathological abnormalities (grade 0), suggesting that the anatomical changes lag behind the development of clinical abnormalities. In eight cases, neuropathological changes could only be recognized microscopically (grade 1). The earliest changes were seen in the medial paraventricular portions of the caudate nucleus (CN), in the tail of the CN, and in the dorsal part of the putamen. Counts of neurons in the CN reveal that 50% are lost in grade 1 and that 95% are lost in grade 4; astrocytes are greatly increased in grades 2-4. These studies indicate that analyses of the CN in grade 4 would reflect mainly its astrocytic composition with a component of remote neurons projecting to the striatum. Because of the relative preservation of the lateral half of the head of the CN in grades 1-2, these regions would reflect early cellular and biochemical changes in HD.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“HD patients at early stages of striatal degeneration (grade I [17]) have normal levels of Glut3 protein, but show a decline in glucose utilization in the brain [3,8,18].”
From Glucose transporter 3 is a rab11-dependent trafficking cargo and its transport to the cell surface is reduced in neurons of CAG140 Huntington’s disease mice (2014) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“differences in miRNA expression between HD and unaffected controls, independent of cellular composition, would be difficult to assess due to the extent of neuron loss and the increase of reactive astrocytosis in HD striatal tissue [25].”
From miR-10b-5p expression in Huntington’s disease brain relates to age of onset and the extent of striatal involvement (2015) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Protein aggregation and neurodegenerative disease
Ross, C. A., & Poirier, M. A. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1066 · Cited by 3,454
Mangiarini, L., Sathasivam, K., Seller, M., Cozens, B., Harper, A., Hetherington, C., Lawton, M., Trottier, Y., Lehrach, H., Davies, S. W., et al. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81369-0 · Cited by 3,073
Frontal-subcortical circuits and human behavior
Cummings, J. L. (1993) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1993.00540080076020 · Cited by 2,262
Circuitry of Primate Prefrontal Cortex and Regulation of Behavior by Representational Memory
Goldman‐Rakic, P. S. (1987) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010509 · Cited by 1,960
Basal ganglia and cerebellar loops: motor and cognitive circuits
Middleton, F. (2000) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(99)00040-5 · Cited by 1,940
Metadata
- Authors
- VONSATTEL, J.-P., MYERS, R. H., STEVENS, T. J., FERRANTE, R. J., BIRD, E. D., & RICHARDSON, E. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985-11
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 559-577
- ISSN
- 0022-3069
- Cited by
- 2,227
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review