The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Infarcts of undetermined cause: The NINCDS stroke data bank
Abstract
In a prospective study of 1,805 hospitalized patients in the Stroke Data Bank of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke, the 1,273 with infarction were classified into diagnostic subtypes. Diagnosis was based on the clinical history, examination, and laboratory tests including computed tomography, noninvasive vascular imaging, and where safe and relevant, angiography. Five hundred and eight cases (fully 40%) were labeled as infarcts of undetermined cause (IUC), of which 138 (27%) were evaluated with both computed tomography and angiography. The clinical syndrome and computed tomographic and angiographic findings in 91 (65.9%) of these 138 IUC cases were clearly not attributable to large‐artery thrombosis and could permit reclassification of the infarct as due to some form of embolism. Failure to define a source of embolus kept them in the category of IUC. Thirty‐one cases (22.5%) could be reclassified as due to stenosis or thrombosis of a large artery, and 16 (11.6%) as lacunar infarction. To determine if those selected for angiography among the IUC patients differed from those with other final diagnoses, a stepwise multiple logistic model was used. The most important characteristics were young age, presence of a superficial infarct, prior transient ischemic attack, low weakness score, and presentation with a nonlacunar syndrome. The results of the model suggest that angiography use was determined by clinical characteristics uniformly across centers and not by final diagnosis. Continued use of the category IUC may help clarify risk factors and stroke subtypes, allow new mechanisms of ischemic stroke to be uncovered, and prevent classification categories of stroke used in clinical trials from becoming too broad.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction
Bamford, J., Sandercock, P., Dennis, M., Warlow, C., & Burn, J. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)93206-o · Cited by 3,294
Risk factors, outcome, and treatment in subtypes of ischemic stroke: the German stroke data bank
Grau, A. J., Weimar, C., Buggle, F., Heinrich, A., Goertler, M., Neumaier, S., Glahn, J., Brandt, T., Hacke, W., & Diener, H.-C. (2001) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/hs1101.098524 · Cited by 998
Stroke injury, cognitive impairment and vascular dementia
Kalaria, R. N., Akinyemi, R., & Ihara, M. (2016) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.01.015 · Cited by 647
Comparing Stroke Incidence Worldwide: What Makes Studies Comparable?
Sudlow, C. L. M., & Warlow, C. P. (1996) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.27.3.550 · Cited by 451
Patent Foramen Ovale and Stroke
Homma, S., & Sacco, R. L. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.104.524371 · Cited by 435
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sacco, R. L., Ellenberg, J. H., Mohr, J. P., Tatemichi, T. K., Hier, D. B., Price, T. R., & Wolf, P. A.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-04
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 382-390
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W1975186830
- Cited by
- 767
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infarcts of undetermined cause: The NINCDS stroke data bank. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410250410
- The paper
- Sacco, R. L., Ellenberg, J. H., Mohr, J. P., Tatemichi, T. K., Hier, D. B., Price, T. R., & Wolf, P. A. (1989). Infarcts of undetermined cause: The NINCDS stroke data bank. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410250410
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.