Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 767

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Infarcts of undetermined cause: The NINCDS stroke data bank

Sacco, R. L., Ellenberg, J. H., Mohr, J. P., Tatemichi, T. K., Hier, D. B., Price, T. R., Wolf, P. A.·1989·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

In a prospective study of 1,805 hospitalized patients in the Stroke Data Bank of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke, the 1,273 with infarction were classified into diagnostic subtypes. Diagnosis was based on the clinical history, examination, and laboratory tests including computed tomography, noninvasive vascular imaging, and where safe and relevant, angiography. Five hundred and eight cases (fully 40%) were labeled as infarcts of undetermined cause (IUC), of which 138 (27%) were evaluated with both computed tomography and angiography. The clinical syndrome and computed tomographic and angiographic findings in 91 (65.9%) of these 138 IUC cases were clearly not attributable to large‐artery thrombosis and could permit reclassification of the infarct as due to some form of embolism. Failure to define a source of embolus kept them in the category of IUC. Thirty‐one cases (22.5%) could be reclassified as due to stenosis or thrombosis of a large artery, and 16 (11.6%) as lacunar infarction. To determine if those selected for angiography among the IUC patients differed from those with other final diagnoses, a stepwise multiple logistic model was used. The most important characteristics were young age, presence of a superficial infarct, prior transient ischemic attack, low weakness score, and presentation with a nonlacunar syndrome. The results of the model suggest that angiography use was determined by clinical characteristics uniformly across centers and not by final diagnosis. Continued use of the category IUC may help clarify risk factors and stroke subtypes, allow new mechanisms of ischemic stroke to be uncovered, and prevent classification categories of stroke used in clinical trials from becoming too broad.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410250410

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 767

Metadata

Authors
Sacco, R. L., Ellenberg, J. H., Mohr, J. P., Tatemichi, T. K., Hier, D. B., Price, T. R., & Wolf, P. A.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-04
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
382-390
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W1975186830
Cited by
767
References
0
FWCI
9.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infarcts of undetermined cause: The NINCDS stroke data bank. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410250410
The paper
Sacco, R. L., Ellenberg, J. H., Mohr, J. P., Tatemichi, T. K., Hier, D. B., Price, T. R., & Wolf, P. A. (1989). Infarcts of undetermined cause: The NINCDS stroke data bank. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410250410

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.