Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 396

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Striatal D2 receptor status in patients with Parkinson's disease, striatonigral degeneration, and progressive supranuclear palsy, measured with 11C‐raclopride and positron emission tomography

Open access
Brooks, D. J., Ibanez, V., Sawle, G. V., Playford, E. D., Quinn, N., Mathias, C. J., Lees, A. J., Marsden, C. D., Bannister, R., Frackowiak, R. S. J.·1992·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Equilibrium striatal: cerebellar 11 C‐raclopride (RAC) uptake ratios reflect the density of striatal dopamine D 2 binding sites. Using positron emission tomographic scanning we have measured striatal RAC uptake in 6 untreated patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), 5 chronically treated patients with PD and a fluctuating response to L‐dopa, 10 patients with striatonigral degeneration (SND), and 9 patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Regional cerebral blood flow was determined also, with C 15 O 2. Mean strital: cerebellar RAC uptake was not significantly different from normal in untreated patients with PD, though 2 of these 6 patients showed significantly increased putamen tracer binding. Mean caudate and putamen: cerebellar RAC uptake ratios of the group with PD and fluctuating response to L‐dopa were significantly reduced by 30% and 18%, respectively. The patients with SND had lesser, but significant, 10% and 11% decreases in mean caudate and putamen: cerebellar RAC uptake ratios, respectively, whereas patients with PSP showed 24% and 9% reductions in caudate and putamen: cerebellar RAC binding. Striatal and frontal blood flow were significantly reduced in patients with PSP, but not in patients with PD or SND. In conclusion, striatal D 2 binding potential is normal or raised in untreated patients with PD, but reduced in patients with PD and a fluctuating response to L‐dopa. Patients with SND and PSP show a decrease in striatal RAC binding, but to a lesser extent than patients with PD and a fluctuating response to treatment. Failure of patients with SND and PSP to respond well to L‐dopa cannot therefore be due to losss of striatal D 2 sites alone, but must reflect loss of other basal ganglia connections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410310209

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 396

Metadata

Authors
Brooks, D. J., Ibanez, V., Sawle, G. V., Playford, E. D., Quinn, N., Mathias, C. J., Lees, A. J., Marsden, C. D., Bannister, R., & Frackowiak, R. S. J.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-02
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
184-192
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2104004822
Cited by
396
References
43
FWCI
12.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Striatal D2 receptor status in patients with Parkinson's disease, striatonigral degeneration, and progressive supranuclear palsy, measured with 11C‐raclopride and positron emission tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410310209
The paper
Brooks, D. J., Ibanez, V., Sawle, G. V., Playford, E. D., Quinn, N., Mathias, C. J., Lees, A. J., Marsden, C. D., Bannister, R., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1992). Striatal D2 receptor status in patients with Parkinson's disease, striatonigral degeneration, and progressive supranuclear palsy, measured with 11C‐raclopride and positron emission tomography. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410310209

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.