The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Large focal tumor‐like demyelinating lesions of the brain: Intermediate entity between multiple sclerosis and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis? A study of 31 patients
Abstract
Thirty‐one patients with large, focal cerebral demyelinating lesions are reported. Twenty‐four patients had solitary lesions and 7 had multiple foci, the latter apparently of identical age. The lesions presented clinically and radiologically as brain tumors (gliomas or metastases) or as multiple cysts. Six patients were older than 57 years (2 in their 70s) at the onset of their symptoms. The demyelinating nature of the lesions was established through biopsy in each patient and all improved significantly after corticosteroid therapy. Three patients developed additional lesions during the follow‐up periods ranging from 9 months to 12 years consistent with the course of multiple sclerosis. Twenty‐eight patients did not develop additional lesions. These included 6 patients with multiple lesions at the onset. In 1 of the patients, the first symptoms developed 10 days after receiving vaccination against influenza. Two patients had concomitant malignancy (chronic monomyelogenous leukemia and retroperitoneal seminoma respectively) and 1 patient developed immunoblastic sarcoma in the opposite hemisphere after biopsy diagnosis and steroid treatment of her demyelinating lesion. Tumor‐like masses of demyelination may occupy an intermediate position between multiple sclerosis and postinfectious/postvaccination encephalitis. The clinical course (history of vaccination in one instance, acute onset, good response to corticosteroids, no clinical or radiological evidence of new lesions in the great majority of patients) favored postinfectious/postvaccination encephalitis. Lesion size however greatly exceeded that of the small foci of perivenous demyelination seen in typical postinfectious/postvaccination encephalitis and tended to present as space‐occupying masses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: A long-term follow-up study of 84 pediatric patients
Tenembaum, S., Chamoles, N., & Fejerman, N. (2002) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.59.8.1224 · Cited by 710
Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: a consensus approach
Miller, D., Weinshenker, B., Filippi, M., Banwell, B., Cohen, J., Freedman, M., Galetta, S., Hutchinson, M., Johnson, R., Kappos, L., et al. (2008) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/1352458508096878 · Cited by 642
Clinical and radiographic spectrum of pathologically confirmed tumefactive multiple sclerosis
Lucchinetti, C. F., Gavrilova, R. H., Metz, I., Parisi, J. E., Scheithauer, B. W., Weigand, S., Thomsen, K., Mandrekar, J., Altintas, A., Erickson, B. J., et al. (2008) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awn098 · Cited by 493
for the MAGNIMS network, Seewann, A., Enzinger, C., Filippi, M., Barkhof, F., Rovira, A., Gass, A., Miller, D., Montalban, X., Thompson, A., et al. (2008) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-007-0754-x · Cited by 98
The Differential Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis
Rolak, L. A., & Fleming, J. O. (2007) · The Neurologist · doi:10.1097/01.nrl.0000254705.39956.34 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Kepes, J. J.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-27
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2056493652
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large focal tumor‐like demyelinating lesions of the brain: Intermediate entity between multiple sclerosis and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis? A study of 31 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410330105
- The paper
- Kepes, J. J. (1993). Large focal tumor‐like demyelinating lesions of the brain: Intermediate entity between multiple sclerosis and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis? A study of 31 patients. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410330105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.