Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for monitoring disease progression in multiple sclerosis

Arnold, Douglas L., Riess, Gerald T., Matthews, Paul M., Francis, Gordon S., Collins, D. Louis, Wolfson, Christina, Antel, Jack P.·1994·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Decreases in brain N‐acetylasparatate are associated with neuronal loss or dysfunction. We report a longitudinal study in which changes in the N‐acetylaspartate to creatine resonance intensity ratio measured by brain proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy were used to follow the progression of brain pathology in 7 patients with multiple sclerosis over an 18‐month period. Four of the patients had a history of recurrent relapses and 3 had a secondary progressive course. All had clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evidence of persistent neurological abnormalaties. At 6‐month intervals proton magnetic resonance spectra were obtained and the N‐acetylaspartate–creatine ratio was determined for each patient. The volumes of hyperintense signal from lesions on conventional magnetic resonance images and the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale scores were determined concurrently. At the onset of the study, the N‐acetylaspartate–creatine ratio was significantly (p < 0.05) lower in the central brain volumes from the patients than in 13 normal control subjects. At 12 and 18 months of follow‐up, the ratio had decreased further in all patients (p < 0.05), consistent with progressive accumulation of neuronal damage. In contrast to magnetic resonance spectra data, changes in lesion volume on magnetic resonance images or disability status did not reach significance over this period. Subgroup analysis showed that changes (increases or decreases) in the N‐acetylaspartate–creatine ratio between consecutive 6‐month examinations correlated significantly (r = –0.74, p < 0.005) with changes in lesion volume on magnetic resonance images in patients with a history of relapses. This pilot study suggests that proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy may be useful in evaluating the progression of cerebral damage in multiple sclerosis using a novel quantitative index based on neuronal damage or dysfunction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410360115

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
Arnold, D. L., Riess, G. T., Matthews, P. M., Francis, G. S., Collins, D. L., Wolfson, C., & Antel, J. P.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-07
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
76-82
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2143122654
Cited by
192
References
2
FWCI
8.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for monitoring disease progression in multiple sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410360115
The paper
Arnold, D. L., Riess, G. T., Matthews, P. M., Francis, G. S., Collins, D. L., Wolfson, C., & Antel, J. P. (1994). Use of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for monitoring disease progression in multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410360115

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.