Cited by 113Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus

Cerebrospinal fluid levels of amyloid β‐protein in alzheimer's disease: Inverse correlation with severity of dementia and effect of apolipoprotein e genotype

Nitsch, Roger M., Rebeck, G. William, Deng, Meihua, Richardson, U. Ingrid, Tennis, Marsha, Schenk, Dale B., Vigo‐Pelfrey, Carmen, Lieberburg, Ivan +3 more·1995·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by formation in brain of neurofibrillary tangles and of amyloid deposits. The major protein component of the former is tau, while the latter are composed of amyloid beta-peptides (A beta), which are derived by proteolytic cleavage of the amyloid beta-protein precursor (APP). Both tau and various secretory APP derivatives including A beta and APPS are present in human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). To investigate whether clinical signs of AD are paralleled by changes in CSF levels of these proteins, we correlated quantitative measures of dementia severity with CSF concentrations of A beta, of APPS, and of tau. We found that levels of A beta in CSF of AD patients were inversely correlated both to cognitive and to functional measures of dementia severity. In contrast, levels of APPS and of tau did not correlate with dementia severity. Apolipoprotein E (apoE) genotype did not influence CSF levels of A beta, APPS, or tau, which were similar among AD patients with Apo E epsilon 3/3, epsilon 3/4, and epsilon 4/4 alleles. These data indicate that CSF levels of A beta decrease with advancing severity of dementia in AD and suggest that they are independent of a patient's Apo E genotype.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410370414

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nitsch, R. M., Rebeck, G. W., Deng, M., Richardson, U. I., Tennis, M., Schenk, D. B., Vigo‐Pelfrey, C., Lieberburg, I., Wurtman, R. J., Hyman, B. T., & Growdon, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Nitsch, Roger M.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-04
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
512-518
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2163652052
Cited by
113
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (2P50 AG-01534)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH 28783)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 01066, M01RR001066)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, dementia severity, APOE genotype, tau protein, cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Amyloid beta-Peptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review