The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Locomotor capacity of spinal cord in paraplegic patients
Abstract
The induction of complex bilateral leg muscle activation combined with coordinated stepping movements is demonstrated in patients with complete paraplegia. This was achieved by partially unloading patients who were on a moving treadmill. In comparison to healthy subjects, the paraplegic patients displayed a less dynamic mode of muscle activation. In all other respects leg muscle electromyographic activity was modulated in a similar manner to that in healthy subjects. However, the level of electromyographic activity in the gastrocnemius (the main antigravity muscle during gait) was considerably lower in the patients. During the course of a daily locomotor training program, the amplitude of gastrocnemius electromyographic activity increased significantly during the stance phase, while inappropriate tibialis anterior activation decreased. Incompletely paraplegic patients benefited form the training with respect to performance of unsupported stepping movements on solid ground. In about half of completely paraplegic patients with low muscle tone, no beneficial effect of the training was seen. This may be due to an inhibitory effect on spinal neuronal activity by drugs patients were taking (e.g., prazosin, clonidine, cannabinoids). In this study intrathecal application of clonidine drastically reduced, while epinephrine enhanced locomotor muscle electromyographic activity. The results of this study promise to be significant in the treatment of paraplegic patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maurer, M., Henn, V., Dittrich, A., & Hofmann, A. (1990) · European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/bf02190083 · Cited by 117
Cited by
Patient- cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results
Riener, R., Lunenburger, L., Jezernik, S., Anderschitz, M., Colombo, G., & Dietz, V. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2005.848628 · Cited by 729
Self-citationLocomotor Training After Human Spinal Cord Injury: A Series of Case Studies
Behrman, A. L., & Harkema, S. J. (2000) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/80.7.688 · Cited by 593
Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI
Dobkin, B., Apple, D., Barbeau, H., Basso, M., Behrman, A., Deforge, D., Ditunno, J., Dudley, G., Elashoff, R., Fugate, L., et al. (2006) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000202600.72018.39 · Cited by 474
Spinal shock revisited: a four-phase model
Ditunno, J. F., Little, J. W., Tessler, A., & Burns, A. S. (2004) · Spinal Cord · doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101603 · Cited by 441
Do human bipeds use quadrupedal coordination?
Dietz, V. (2002) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(02)02229-4 · Cited by 417
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dietz, V., Colombo, G., Jensen, L., & Baumgartner, L.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 574-582
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2006905403
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Locomotor capacity of spinal cord in paraplegic patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410370506
- The paper
- Dietz, V., Colombo, G., Jensen, L., & Baumgartner, L. (1995). Locomotor capacity of spinal cord in paraplegic patients. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410370506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.