The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spontaneous neurological recovery after stroke and the fate of the ischemic penumbra
Abstract
We prospectively tested the hypothesis that early recovery after ischemic stroke depends on the ultimate survival of functionally impaired, critically ischemic (i.e., “penumbral”) tissue. From a series of 26 consecutive patients studied with positron emission tomography within 18 hours of first‐ever stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory, all 11 survivors to the 2‐month end point who exhibited increased oxygen extraction fraction were declared eligible. The positron emission tomographic images were compared to ultimate infarction defined by computed tomography performed during the chronic stage. The penumbra (operationally defined by increased oxygen extraction fraction and divided outcome despite uniformly reduced cerebral blood flow) was individually detected in 10 of the 11 patients; cerebral blood flow ranged from 7 to 17 ml/100 gm·min, consistent with that found in monkey studies. The volume of the penumbra that escaped infarction was highly correlated with neurological recovery (p<0.04 to p<0.0001, depending on the scale used). This longitudinal study is the first to characterize the penumbra in humans and to document one mechanism strongly influencing recovery; the surviving penumbra may offer opportunities for secondary perifocal neuronal reorganization. Therapeutic measures to prevent infarction of the penumbra (up to 16 hours in this series) may have reduced residual neurological impairment. Mapping the extent of the penumbra, according to prospective criteria, may allow one to predict each patient's potential for recovery, and to select the most appropriate candidates for therapeutic trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thresholds in cerebral ischemia - the ischemic penumbra.
Astrup, J., Siesjö, B. K., & Symon, L. (1981) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.12.6.723 · Cited by 2,820
Cited by
Pathobiology of ischaemic stroke: an integrated view
Dirnagl, U., Iadecola, C., & Moskowitz, M. A. (1999) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(99)01401-0 · Cited by 3,943
Sacco, R. L., Kasner, S. E., Broderick, J. P., Caplan, L. R., Connors, J. J. (., Culebras, A., Elkind, M. S. V., George, M. G., Hamdan, A. D., Higashida, R. T., et al. (2013) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0b013e318296aeca · Cited by 3,569
A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke
Cramer, S. C., Nelles, G., Benson, R. R., Kaplan, J. D., Parker, R. A., Kwong, K. K., Kennedy, D. N., Finklestein, S. P., & Rosen, B. R. (1997) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.28.12.2518 · Cited by 1,019
Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery
Cramer, S. C. (2008) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21393 · Cited by 875
Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: Facts and theories
Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B., & Lindeman, E. (2004) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-2004-00282 · Cited by 727
Metadata
- Authors
- Furlan, M., Marchal, G., Derlon, J., Baron, J., & Viader, F.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 216-226
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2080370764
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spontaneous neurological recovery after stroke and the fate of the ischemic penumbra. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410400213
- The paper
- Furlan, M., Marchal, G., Derlon, J., Baron, J., & Viader, F. (1996). Spontaneous neurological recovery after stroke and the fate of the ischemic penumbra. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410400213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.