Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 519

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spontaneous neurological recovery after stroke and the fate of the ischemic penumbra

Furlan, Mauro, Marchal, Gilles, Derlon, Jean‐Michel, Baron, Jean‐Claude, Viader, Fausto·1996·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

We prospectively tested the hypothesis that early recovery after ischemic stroke depends on the ultimate survival of functionally impaired, critically ischemic (i.e., “penumbral”) tissue. From a series of 26 consecutive patients studied with positron emission tomography within 18 hours of first‐ever stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory, all 11 survivors to the 2‐month end point who exhibited increased oxygen extraction fraction were declared eligible. The positron emission tomographic images were compared to ultimate infarction defined by computed tomography performed during the chronic stage. The penumbra (operationally defined by increased oxygen extraction fraction and divided outcome despite uniformly reduced cerebral blood flow) was individually detected in 10 of the 11 patients; cerebral blood flow ranged from 7 to 17 ml/100 gm·min, consistent with that found in monkey studies. The volume of the penumbra that escaped infarction was highly correlated with neurological recovery (p<0.04 to p<0.0001, depending on the scale used). This longitudinal study is the first to characterize the penumbra in humans and to document one mechanism strongly influencing recovery; the surviving penumbra may offer opportunities for secondary perifocal neuronal reorganization. Therapeutic measures to prevent infarction of the penumbra (up to 16 hours in this series) may have reduced residual neurological impairment. Mapping the extent of the penumbra, according to prospective criteria, may allow one to predict each patient's potential for recovery, and to select the most appropriate candidates for therapeutic trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410400213

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Furlan, M., Marchal, G., Derlon, J., Baron, J., & Viader, F.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-08
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
216-226
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2080370764
Cited by
519
References
1
FWCI
21.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.