The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opposite motor effects of pallidal stimulation in Parkinson's disease
Open accessAbstract
We studied the effects—on parkinsonian signs, on levodopa‐induced dyskinesias, and on levodopa response—of acute experimental high‐frequency stimulation of the internal pallidum (GPi) during off‐drug and on‐drug phases. Thirteen quadripolar electrodes were evaluated in 8 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Stimulation of the most ventral contacts, lying at the ventral margin of or just below the GPi, led to pronounced improvement in rigidity and a complete arrest of levodopa‐induced dyskinesias. The antiakinetic effect of levodopa was also blocked and the patients became severely akinetic. Stimulation of the most dorsal contacts, lying at the dorsal border of the GPi or inside the external pallidum, usually led to the moderate improvement of off‐drug akinesia and could also induce dyskinesias in some patients. When using an intermediate contact for chronic stimulation, a good compromise between these opposite effects was usually obtained, mimicking the effect of pallidotomy. We conclude that there are at least two different functional zones within the globus pallidus, at the basis of a different pathophysiology of the cardinal symptoms of PD. The opposite effects may explain the variable results of pallidal surgery reported in the literature and may also largely explain the paradox of PD surgery. A possible anatomical basis for these differential functional effects could be a functional somatotopy within the GPi, with the segregation of the pallidofugal fibers from the outer portion of the GPi, on one hand, forming the ventral ansa lenticularis and from the inner portion of the GPi, on the other hand, forming the dorsal lenticular fasciculus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing
Alexander, G. E., & Crutcher, M. D. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90107-l · Cited by 4,131
Electrical stimulation of neural tissue to evoke behavioral responses
Tehovnik, E. J. (1996) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/0165-0270(95)00131-x · Cited by 478
Cited by
The scientific and clinical basis for the treatment of Parkinson disease (2009)
Olanow, C. W., Stern, M. B., & Sethi, K. (2009) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181a1d44c · Cited by 908
Pathophysiology of bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease
Berardelli, A. (2001) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/124.11.2131 · Cited by 906
The pedunculopontine nucleus and Parkinson's disease
Pahapill, P. A. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.9.1767 · Cited by 831
Motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: A unified framework
Moustafa, A. A., Chakravarthy, S., Phillips, J. R., Gupta, A., Keri, S., Polner, B., Frank, M. J., & Jahanshahi, M. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.010 · Cited by 481
Selection of stimulus parameters for deep brain stimulation
Kuncel, A. M., & Grill, W. M. (2004) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.05.031 · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- Krack, P., Pollak, P., Limousin, P., Hoffmann, D., Benazzouz, A., Le Bas, J. F., Koudsie, A., & Benabid, A. L.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 180-192
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2078221478
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Opposite motor effects of pallidal stimulation in Parkinson's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410430208
- The paper
- Krack, P., Pollak, P., Limousin, P., Hoffmann, D., Benazzouz, A., Le Bas, J. F., Koudsie, A., & Benabid, A. L. (1998). Opposite motor effects of pallidal stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410430208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.