Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enzymes in Organic Synthesis: Application to the Problems of Carbohydrate Recognition (Part 2)

Wong, Chi‐Huey, Halcomb, Randall L., Ichikawa, Yoshitaka, Kajimoto, Tetsuya·1995·Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English

Abstract

Recognition of carbohydrates by proteins and nucleic acids is highly specific, but the dissociation constants are relatively high (generally in the m M to high μ M range) because of the lack of hydrophobic groups in the carbohydrates. The high specificity of this weak binding often comes from many hydrogen bonds and the coordination of metal ions as bridge between sugars and receptors. Though weak hydrophobic interactions between sugars and proteins have also been identified, the unique shape of a complex carbohydrate under the influence of anomeric and exo anomeric effects (the glycosidic torsion angles are therefore often not flexible but are typically somewhat restricted) and the topographic orientation of the hydroxyl and charged groups contribute most significantly to the recognition process. Studies on the structure–function relationship of a complex carbohydrate therefore require deliberate manipulation of its shape and functional groups, and synthesis of oligosaccharide analogs from modified monosaccharides is often useful to address the problem. The availability of various monosaccharides and their analogs for the synthesis of complex carbohydrates together with the information resulting from structural studies (such a NMR or X‐ray studies on sugar–protein complexes) will certainly provide a basic understanding of complex carbohydrate recognition. An ultimate goal is to develop simple and easy‐to‐make non‐carbohydrate molecules that resemble the active structure involved in carbohydrate–receptor interaction or the transition‐state of an enzyme‐catalyzed transformation (for example, glycosidase or glycosyltransferase reactions) and have the approprite bioavailability to be used to control the carbohydrate function in a specific manner. In part one of this review we described various enzymatic approaches to the synthesis of monosaccharides, analogs, and related structures. We describe in this part enzymatic and chemoenzymatic approaches to the synthesis of oligosaccarides and analogs, including those involved in E‐selectin recognition, and strategies to inhibit glycosidases and glycosyltransferases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.199505211

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
Wong, C., Halcomb, R. L., Ichikawa, Y., & Kajimoto, T.
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-03-20
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
521-546
ISSN
0570-0833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4245712284
Cited by
239
References
3
FWCI
26.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enzymes in Organic Synthesis: Application to the Problems of Carbohydrate Recognition (Part 2). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.199505211
The paper
Wong, C., Halcomb, R. L., Ichikawa, Y., & Kajimoto, T. (1995). Enzymes in Organic Synthesis: Application to the Problems of Carbohydrate Recognition (Part 2). Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.199505211

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.