The DOI matches its Crossref record; 185 of the 185 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon—Hydrogen Bonds of DNA Sugar Units as Targets for Chemical Nucleases and Drugs
Abstract
This review article focuses on the molecular aspects of DNA cleavage by synthetic chemical nucleases (transition metal complexes endowed with redox properties and DNA affinity) and natural drugs (cytotoxic agents such as bleomycins or enediynes). Unlike deoxyribonucleases, which catalyze the nucleophilic attack of water on the phosphorus atom of a particular phosphodiester entity, these nonhydrolytic DNA‐cleavers are able to oxidize the sugar units, generally by hydrogen atom abstraction. Examples of oxidative attack on each of the five different CH bonds of deoxyribose are known, depending on the nature, structure, type of activation, or mode of DNA interaction of the DNA‐cleaver. Further evolution at the site of the initial lesion leads to the release of bases, oxidized deoxyribose units, or oxidized sugar fragments appended to the base or the terminal phosphate. In most cases the loss of a part (at least) of a nucleoside, with the concomitant loss of one base information, primarily induces the cleavage of the DNA strand. For both types of DNA cleavage reagents studied within the two last decades, the modes of activation and DNA binding are presented, as well as the details on the mechanism of deoxyribose oxidative degration. Because of the need for highly efficient and highly specific reagents, the development of new artificial and selective DNA cleavers, supported by an improved knowledge of these different mechanisms of DNA cleavage, is to‐day a challenging area in the rational design of antitumoral or antiviral agents, as well as in the field of molecular biology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
[57] Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages
Maxam, A. M., & Gilbert, W. (1980) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(80)65059-9 · Cited by 14,315
Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure
Saenger, W. (1984) · Springer Advanced Texts in Chemistry · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5190-3 · Cited by 4,150
Dietary Carcinogens and Anticarcinogens: Oxygen radicals and degenerative diseases
Ames, B. N. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6351251 · Cited by 2,969
Cytochrome P-450: Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry
de Montellano, O., & Paul, R. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,663
Prooxidant States and Tumor Promotion
Cerutti, P. A. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2981433 · Cited by 2,497
Metalloporphyrins as versatile catalysts for oxidation reactions and oxidative DNA cleavage
Meunier, B. (1992) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00014a008 · Cited by 2,090
Self-citationThe Chemical Basis of Radiation Biology
O'Neill, P. (1987) · International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine · doi:10.1080/09553008714552571 · Cited by 1,835
Biochemistry of Oxidative Stress
Sies, H. (1986) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English · doi:10.1002/anie.198610581 · Cited by 1,306
Sequence-Specific Cleavage of Double Helical DNA by Triple Helix Formation
Moser, H. E., & Dervan, P. B. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3118463 · Cited by 1,284
Steenken, S. (1989) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00093a003 · Cited by 1,230
Cited by
Oxidative Nucleobase Modifications Leading to Strand Scission
Burrows, C. J., & Muller, J. G. (1998) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr960421s · Cited by 1,736
Pogozelski, W. K., & Tullius, T. D. (1998) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr960437i · Cited by 1,018
Copper Complexes as Anticancer Agents
Marzano, C., Pellei, M., Tisato, F., & Santini, C. (2009) · Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/187152009787313837 · Cited by 802
1,10-Phenanthroline: A versatile building block for the construction of ligands for various purposes
Bencini, A., & Lippolis, V. (2010) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2010.04.008 · Cited by 615
Guo, Z., & Sadler, P. J. (1999) · Advances in Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0898-8838(08)60271-8 · Cited by 354
Metadata
- Authors
- Pratviel, G., Bernadou, J., & Meunier, B.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-04-13
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 746-769
- ISSN
- 0570-0833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068256510
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 185
- FWCI
- 11.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon—Hydrogen Bonds of DNA Sugar Units as Targets for Chemical Nucleases and Drugs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.199507461
- The paper
- Pratviel, G., Bernadou, J., & Meunier, B. (1995). Carbon—Hydrogen Bonds of DNA Sugar Units as Targets for Chemical Nucleases and Drugs. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.199507461
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.