The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Can We Learn from Molecular Recognition in Protein–Ligand Complexes for the Design of New Drugs?
Abstract
The understanding of noncovalent interactions in protein–ligand complexes is essential in modern biochemistry and should contribute toward the discovery of new drugs. In the present review, we summarize recent work aimed at a better understanding of the physical nature of molecular recognition in protein–ligand complexes and also at the development and application of new computational tools that exploit our current knowledge on structural and energetic aspects of protein–ligand interactions in the design of novel ligands. These approaches are based on the exponentially growing amount of information about the geometry of protein structures and the properties of small organic molecules exposed to a structured molecular environment. The various contributions that determine the binding affinity of ligands toward a particular receptor are discussed. Their putative binding site conformations are analyzed, and some predictions are attempted. The similarity of ligands is examined with respect to their recognition properties. This information is used to understand and propose binding modes. In addition, an overview of the existing methods for the design and selection of novel protein ligands is given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cramer, R. D., Patterson, D. E., & Bunce, J. D. (1988) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00226a005 · Cited by 3,931
Rational design of potent sialidase-based inhibitors of influenza virus replication
von Itzstein, M., Wu, W.-Y., Kok, G. B., Pegg, M. S., Dyason, J. C., Jin, B., Van Phan, T., Smythe, M. L., White, H. F., Oliver, S. W., et al. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/363418a0 · Cited by 1,862
Cited by
Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions
Halperin, I., Ma, B., Wolfson, H., & Nussinov, R. (2002) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10115 · Cited by 1,294
Entropy-Enthalpy Compensation: Role and Ramifications in Biomolecular Ligand Recognition and Design
Chodera, J. D., & Mobley, D. L. (2013) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-130318 · Cited by 531
Schlothauer, T., Herter, S., Koller, C. F., Grau-Richards, S., Steinhart, V., Spick, C., Kubbies, M., Klein, C., Umaña, P., & Mössner, E. (2016) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzw040 · Cited by 425
QSAR and 3D QSAR in drug design Part 1: methodology
Kubinyi, H. (1997) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/s1359-6446(97)01079-9 · Cited by 357
Sarkhel, S., & Desiraju, G. R. (2004) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10567 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Böhm, H., & Klebe, G.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 2588-2614
- ISSN
- 0570-0833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098622919
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 33.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Can We Learn from Molecular Recognition in Protein–Ligand Complexes for the Design of New Drugs? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.199625881
- The paper
- Böhm, H., & Klebe, G. (1996). What Can We Learn from Molecular Recognition in Protein–Ligand Complexes for the Design of New Drugs? Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.199625881
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.