The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Injectable Microbubbles as Contrast Agents for Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: The Key Role of Perfluorochemicals
Abstract
Ultrasonography has, until recently, lacked effective contrast‐enhancing agents. Micrometer‐sized gas bubbles that resonate at a diagnostic frequency are ideal reflectors for ultrasound. However, simple air bubbles, when injected into the blood stream, disappear within seconds through the combined effects of Laplace pressure, blood pressure, and exposure to ultrasound energy. Use of fluorocarbon vapor, by extending the persistence of microbubbles in vivo from seconds to minutes, propelled contrast ultrasonography into clinical practice. Imaging techniques that selectively suppress tissue, but not microbubble signal, further increase image contrast. Approved products consist of C 3 F 8 or SF 6 microbubbles, and N 2 microbubbles osmotically stabilized with C 6 F 14. These agents allow the detection and characterization of cardiovascular abnormalities and solid organ lesions, such as tumors. By providing higher quality images, they improve the accuracy and confidence of disease diagnosis, and can play a decisive role in clinical decision making. New objectives include agents that target specific cells for the molecular imaging of disease, and drug and gene delivery, including ultrasound‐triggered delivery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anselmo, A. C., & Mitragotri, S. (2016) · Bioengineering & Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/btm2.10003 · Cited by 1,321
Membrane Electroporation and Electropermeabilization: Mechanisms and Models
Kotnik, T., Rems, L., Tarek, M., & Miklavčič, D. (2019) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-052118-115451 · Cited by 813
Conquering the Hypoxia Limitation for Photodynamic Therapy
Wan, Y., Fu, L., Li, C., Lin, J., & Huang, P. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202103978 · Cited by 705
Evolution of contrast agents for ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-mediated drug delivery
Paefgen, V., Doleschel, D., & Kiessling, F. (2015) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2015.00197 · Cited by 272
Recent advances in stimuli-responsive polymer systems for remotely controlled drug release
Zhang, A., Jung, K., Li, A., Liu, J., & Boyer, C. (2019) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101164 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Schutt, E. G., Klein, D. H., Mattrey, R. M., & Riess, J. G.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-07-16
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 28
- Pages
- 3218-3235
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W2153057832
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Injectable Microbubbles as Contrast Agents for Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: The Key Role of Perfluorochemicals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.200200550
- The paper
- Schutt, E. G., Klein, D. H., Mattrey, R. M., & Riess, J. G. (2003). Injectable Microbubbles as Contrast Agents for Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: The Key Role of Perfluorochemicals. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200200550
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.