The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chemical Imaging of Spatial Heterogeneities in Catalytic Solids at Different Length and Time Scales
Abstract
Catalytic solids in the spotlight: Detailed insight into the working principles of heterogeneous catalysts is essential for the design of improved or totally new ones. Such insight can be provided by making use of chemical imaging techniques, which yield spatiotemporal information about the workings of catalytic solids at different length scales: at the level of reactors, catalyst bodies, catalyst grains, and nanoparticles.magnified image Knowledge of spatiotemporal gradients in heterogeneous catalysts is of paramount importance for the rational design of new and more sustainable catalytic processes. Heterogeneities resulting in space‐ and time‐dependent phenomena occur at different length scales; that is, at the level of catalytic reactors (mm to m), catalyst bodies (μm to mm), catalyst grains (nm to μm), and active sites and metal (oxide) particles (Å to nm). This Review documents the recent advances in the development of space‐ and time‐resolved spectroscopic methods for imaging spatial heterogeneities within catalytic processes at these four length scales. Particular emphasis will be on the use of magnetic resonance, optical, and synchrotron‐based methods, their capabilities in providing spatial resolution (1D and 2D imaging) and depth profiling (3D imaging) as well as on their time‐resolved application, potential for single‐molecule and nanoparticle detection, and use under reaction conditions. The Review ends with future prospects on spectroscopic markers for catalytic activity, label‐free spectroscopy, tomography at the nanoscale, and correlative microscopic approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tian, N., Zhou, Z.-Y., Sun, S.-G., Ding, Y., & Wang, Z. L. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1140484 · Cited by 3,073
Hell, S. W. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1137395 · Cited by 2,967
Narayanan, R., & El-Sayed, M. A. (2005) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp051066p · Cited by 1,298
Cited by
Schlögl, R. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201410738 · Cited by 1,043
The concept of active site in heterogeneous catalysis
Vogt, C., & Weckhuysen, B. M. (2022) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-021-00340-y · Cited by 851
Self-citationEnhanced Raman Scattering with Dielectrics
Alessandri, I., & Lombardi, J. R. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00365 · Cited by 655
Catalytic processes monitored at the nanoscale with tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy
van Schrojenstein Lantman, E. M., Deckert-Gaudig, T., Mank, A. J. G., Deckert, V., & Weckhuysen, B. M. (2012) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.131 · Cited by 630
Self-citationAdvances in theory and their application within the field of zeolite chemistry
Van Speybroeck, V., Hemelsoet, K., Joos, L., Waroquier, M., Bell, R. G., & Catlow, C. R. A. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00029g · Cited by 516
Metadata
- Authors
- Weckhuysen, B. M.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-06-17
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 4910-4943
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W2148667390
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 35.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical Imaging of Spatial Heterogeneities in Catalytic Solids at Different Length and Time Scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.200900339
- The paper
- Weckhuysen, B. M. (2009). Chemical Imaging of Spatial Heterogeneities in Catalytic Solids at Different Length and Time Scales. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200900339
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.