Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Colorimetric Detection of Glucose in Rat Brain Using Gold Nanoparticles

Jiang, Ying, Zhao, Hong, Lin, Yuqing, Zhu, Ningning, Ma, Yurong, Mao, Lanqun·2010·Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Abstract

A gold-based assay: By taking advantage of the unique optical properties of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and the cascade reactions of glucose, a simple but effective method has been successfully developed for the direct colorimetric visualization of glucose in the rat brain. GOD=glucose oxidase.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.201001057

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Jiang, Y., Zhao, H., Lin, Y., Zhu, N., Ma, Y., & Mao, L.
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-21
Volume
49
Issue
28
Pages
4800-4804
ISSN
  • 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3773
OpenAlex
W2150355157
Cited by
276
References
4
FWCI
12.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Colorimetric Detection of Glucose in Rat Brain Using Gold Nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.201001057
The paper
Jiang, Y., Zhao, H., Lin, Y., Zhu, N., Ma, Y., & Mao, L. (2010). Colorimetric Detection of Glucose in Rat Brain Using Gold Nanoparticles. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201001057

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.