The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Highly Sensitive Detection of Ionizing Radiations by a Photoluminescent Uranyl Organic Framework
Abstract
Precise detection of low‐dose X‐ and γ‐radiations remains a challenge and is particularly important for studying biological effects under low‐dose ionizing radiation, safety control in medical radiation treatment, survey of environmental radiation background, and monitoring cosmic radiations. We report here a photoluminescent uranium organic framework, whose photoluminescence intensity can be accurately correlated with the exposure dose of X‐ or γ‐radiations. This allows for precise and instant detection of ionizing radiations down to the level of 10−4 Gy, representing a significant improvement on the detection limit of approximately two orders of magnitude, compared to other chemical dosimeters reported up to now. The electron paramagnetic resonance analysis suggests that with the exposure to radiations, the carbonyl double bonds break affording oxo‐radicals that can be stabilized within the conjugated uranium oxalate‐carboxylate sheet. This gives rise to a substantially enhanced equatorial bonding of the uranyl(VI) ions as elucidated by the single‐crystal structure of the γ‐ray irradiated material, and subsequently leads to a very effective photoluminescence quenching through phonon‐assisted relaxation. The quenched sample can be easily recovered by heating, enabling recycled detection for multiple runs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ordered porous materials for emerging applications
Davis, M. E. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00785 · Cited by 5,308
CANCER RISKS FROM MEDICAL RADIATION
Ron, E. (2003) · Health Physics · doi:10.1097/00004032-200307000-00011 · Cited by 382
Cited by
Sun, Q., Aguila, B., Earl, L. D., Abney, C. W., Wojtas, L., Thallapally, P. K., & Ma, S. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201705479 · Cited by 641
Water and Metal–Organic Frameworks: From Interaction toward Utilization
Liu, X., Wang, X., & Kapteijn, F. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00746 · Cited by 614
Li, Y., Yang, Z., Wang, Y., Bai, Z., Zheng, T., Dai, X., Liu, S., Gui, D., Liu, W., Chen, M., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01208-w · Cited by 409
Self-citationX-ray-activated nanosystems for theranostic applications
Chen, X., Song, J., Chen, X., & Yang, H. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00921j · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Xie, J., Wang, Y., Liu, W., Yin, X., Chen, L., Zou, Y., Diwu, J., Chai, Z., Albrecht‐Schmitt, T. E., Liu, G., & Wang, S.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-05-19
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 7500-7504
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W2614789155
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly Sensitive Detection of Ionizing Radiations by a Photoluminescent Uranyl Organic Framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.201700919
- The paper
- Xie, J., Wang, Y., Liu, W., Yin, X., Chen, L., Zou, Y., Diwu, J., Chai, Z., Albrecht‐Schmitt, T. E., Liu, G., & Wang, S. (2017). Highly Sensitive Detection of Ionizing Radiations by a Photoluminescent Uranyl Organic Framework. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201700919
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.