Cited by 100Protein Structure and Dynamicsvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesChemical Synthesis and Analysis

Ranking Peptide Binders by Affinity with AlphaFold**

Open access
Chang, Liwei, Perez, Alberto·2023·Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

AlphaFold has revolutionized structural biology by predicting highly accurate structures of proteins and their complexes with peptides and other proteins. However, for protein‐peptide systems, we are also interested in identifying the highest affinity binder among a set of candidate peptides. We present a novel competitive binding assay using AlphaFold to predict structures of the receptor in the presence of two peptides. For systems in which the individual structures of the peptides are well predicted, the assay captures the higher affinity binder in the bound state, and the other peptide in the unbound form with statistical significance. We test the application on six protein receptors for which we have experimental binding affinities to several peptides. We find that the assay is best suited for identifying medium to strong peptide binders that adopt stable secondary structures upon binding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.202213362

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, L., & Perez, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Department of Chemistry University of Florida Gainesville FL USA
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-01-12
Volume
62
Issue
7
Pages
e202213362-e202213362
ISSN
  • 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3773
OpenAlex
W4312065672
Cited by
100
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 11
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Cancer Society (AWD11297)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
peptide binding affinity, competitive binding assay, AlphaFold, protein-peptide complex, receptor binding, protein structure prediction, secondary structure stability
MeSH terms
Carrier Proteins, Peptides, Protein Binding, Proteins, Protein Structure, Secondary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review