Cited by 97Polymer crystallization and propertiesWaste Management and Recyclingbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

Properties of recycled and virgin poly(ethylene terephthalate) blend fibers

Lee, Joo Hyung, Lim, Ki Sub, Hahm, Wan Gyu, Kim, Seong Hun·2013·Journal of Applied Polymer Science

Abstract

Abstract Material from recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) chips obtained from used water bottles was extruded with virgin fiber‐grade PET chips in blends of 20, 40, and 70 wt %. Filament fibers from the recycled/virgin PET blends were spun using a melt spinning process and drawn by a thermal drawing process to improve their mechanical properties. As the virgin PET chips were compounded with recycled PET chips, the thermal degradation temperature ( T d ) and the melting temperature ( T m ) were increased, and the crystallization temperature ( T c ) and crystallization rate were decreased. This means that virgin PET has a better thermal stability but a lower crystallization rate than recycled PET. The double melting behavior observed in the case of the drawn fibers may have been a consequence of larger crystallites or areas of crystallites being formed during the thermal drawing process. The birefringence and mechanical properties, such as tensile strength and tensile modulus, increased and elongation at break decreased for the drawn fibers, and this was attributed to the orientation induced during crystallization. The effect of the virgin PET content in the blends on mechanical properties was investigated; 30/70 wt % recycled/virgin blended fibers showed comparable mechanical properties to virgin PET fibers. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/app.38502

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Filament fibers produced from a blend of recycled PET (sourced from used water bottles) and virgin PET demonstrated mechanical properties equivalent to those of fibers made entirely from virgin polyester.

    “In the work of Lee et al. [64], filament fibers produced from a blend of recycled PET (sourced from used water bottles) and virgin PET demonstrated mechanical properties equivalent to those of fibers made entirely from virgin polyester.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, J. H., Lim, K. S., Hahm, W. G., & Kim, S. H.
Affiliations
  • Hanyang University (KR)
  • Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Seong Hun
Venue
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-09-17
Volume
128
Issue
2
Pages
1250-1256
ISSN
  • 0021-8995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4628
OpenAlex
W2057416100
Cited by
97
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 10
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Polymer Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Keywords
recycled PET, melt spinning, thermal drawing, crystallization behavior, thermal stability, birefringence, tensile properties, fiber orientation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review