The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of processing conditions on polymorphic behavior, crystallinity, and morphology of electrospun poly(VInylidene fluoride) nanofibers
Open accessAbstract
The polymorphism and crystallinity of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) membranes, made from electrospinning of the PVDF in pure N,N‐dimethylformamide (DMF) and DMF/acetone mixture solutions are studied. Influence of the processing and solution parameters such as flow rate, applied voltage, solvent system, and mixture ratio, on nanofiber morphology, total crystallinity, and crystal phase content of the nanofibers are investigated using scanning electron microscopy, wide‐angle X‐ray scattering, differential scanning calorimetric, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The results show that solutions of 20% w/w PVDF in two solvent systems of DMF and DMF/acetone (with volume ratios of 3/1 and 1/1) are electrospinnable; however, using DMF/acetone volume ratio of 1/3 led to blockage of the needle and spinning process was stopped. Very high fraction of β‐phase (∼79%–85%) was obtained for investigated nanofiber, while degree of crystallinity increased to 59% which is quite high due to the strong influence of electrospinning on ordering the microstructure. Interestingly, ultrafine fibers with the diameter of 12 and 15 nm were obtained in this work. Uniform and bead free nanofiber was formed when a certain amount of acetone was added in to the electrospinning solution. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 42304.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Persano, L., Dagdeviren, C., Su, Y., Zhang, Y., Girardo, S., Pisignano, D., Huang, Y., & Rogers, J. A. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2639 · Cited by 1,271
Cited by
A Review of Piezoelectric PVDF Film by Electrospinning and Its Applications
Kalimuldina, G., Turdakyn, N., Abay, I., Medeubayev, A., Nurpeissova, A., Adair, D., & Bakenov, Z. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20185214 · Cited by 441
Specific targeting cancer cells with nanoparticles and drug delivery in cancer therapy
Raj, S., Khurana, S., Choudhari, R., Kesari, K. K., Kamal, M. A., Garg, N., Ruokolainen, J., Das, B. C., & Kumar, D. (2021) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.11.002 · Cited by 425
Recent trends in protein and peptide-based biomaterials for advanced drug delivery
Varanko, A., Saha, S., & Chilkoti, A. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.08.008 · Cited by 369
Fluorinated Polymers as Smart Materials for Advanced Biomedical Applications
Cardoso, V., Correia, D., Ribeiro, C., Fernandes, M., & Lanceros-Méndez, S. (2018) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym10020161 · Cited by 286
Song, K., Xu, H., Xu, L., Xie, K., & Yang, Y. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.01.070 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Baqeri, M., Abolhasani, M. M., Mozdianfard, M. R., Guo, Q., Oroumei, A., & Naebe, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Polymer Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04-25
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 30
- ISSN
- 0021-8995 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2069108803
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of processing conditions on polymorphic behavior, crystallinity, and morphology of electrospun poly(VInylidene fluoride) nanofibers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/app.42304
- The paper
- Baqeri, M., Abolhasani, M. M., Mozdianfard, M. R., Guo, Q., Oroumei, A., & Naebe, M. (2015). Influence of processing conditions on polymorphic behavior, crystallinity, and morphology of electrospun poly(VInylidene fluoride) nanofibers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.42304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
