The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping online child safety in Asia and the Pacific
Open accessAbstract
Abstract In today's age, the Internet has become essential for children's education and social development. Yet the very same technologies can expose children to online harm, which can negatively impact their well‐being and safety. These risks are becoming more serious as Internet penetration rises, particularly in emerging countries that have limited resources and capacities to tackle complex issues such as online sexual abuse, cyberbullying, and Internet addiction. As research on the entire range of risks that children are exposed to online is limited, particularly in Asia and the Pacific, this study aims to initiate the process of filling this knowledge gap and proposes a set of policy recommendations to address the challenge of balancing children's online opportunities and risks. A key finding from the study is the need for a multistakeholder and collaborative approach to ensure the online safety of children, which must include children themselves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In terms of the relationship to the victim, perpetrators included family members [23,24], educators [23,24], religious individuals [23,24], peers [23,24], neighbors [23,24], trusted individuals [23,24], and people met online as groomers [4,17,25] and cyber-bullies [13,26].”
From Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse of Children and Adolescents with Disabilities: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For victims with ASD and 22q11 deletion syndrome [26], the reported occurrences included cyber-threats, cyber-harassment, and grooming [25].”
From Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse of Children and Adolescents with Disabilities: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Specific disabilities are mentioned, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD) [17,26,27], Williams Syndrome [17,26], intellectual disabilities [22,26,27], 22q11 deletion syndrome (which involves developmental delays and may face mild intellectual disability or learning disabilities) [26], and physical disabilities [23,25] including deafness [18], and chronic health problems [25].”
From Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse of Children and Adolescents with Disabilities: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, those with Williams Syndrome and ASD [26] shared experiences of perpetrators providing them with gifts in their experience of OCSEA [23], and encountered cyber-threats, cyber-harassment, and grooming, akin to the occurrences reported by individuals with 22q11 deletion syndrome [26] and intellectual disabilities [22].”
From Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse of Children and Adolescents with Disabilities: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Studies also suggested that parents can act as protectors, as they can supervise their child's online activity, preventing OCSEA [24,26].”
From Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse of Children and Adolescents with Disabilities: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In addition, the studies analyzed reveal that perpetrators employ various techniques, such as manipulation [23,27], cyberstalking [13], coercion [27], providing gifts to victims [23], cyber-threats [13,21,23,26,27], cyber-harassment [13,26], sexting [13,21], sextortion [13], grooming [4,13,19,27], and digital alteration of images [21].”
From Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse of Children and Adolescents with Disabilities: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The parents' awareness of online risks and active supervision of children and adolescents provided by their caregivers and parents can serve as essential protective measures [26].”
From Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse of Children and Adolescents with Disabilities: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Not Just 'Revenge Pornography': Australians' Experiences of Image-Based Abuse A SUMMARY REPORT
Henry, N., Powell, A., & Flynn, A. (2018) · Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.29903.59045 · Cited by 61
Powell, A., & Henry, N. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-58047-4_5 · Cited by 16
Child Safety Issues in Cyberspace: A Critical Theory on Trends and Challenges in the ASEAN Region
Rahamathulla, M. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/ijca2015906925 · Cited by 12
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- ECPAT, 2017, Online child sexual exploitation: An analysis of emerging and selected issues, ECPAT International Journal
- ICMEC(2016).Child pornography: Model legislation and global review 8th edition.
- ICMEC(2017).Online grooming of children for sexual purposes: Model legislation & global review 1st edition.
- Ng K. C. &Ho B. C.(2015).APrIGF 2015 workshop report.
- Oxford Internet Institute(2017).How and Why is children's digital data being harvested. 10 May.
- UNESCO(2016).A policy review: Building digital citizenship in Asia‐Pacific through safe effective and responsible use of ICT. Bangkok.
- Varrella A., 2017, Live streaming of child sexual abuse: Background, legislative frameworks and the experience of the Philippines, ECPAT International Journal
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Álvarez-Guerrero, G., Fry, D., Lu, M., & Gaitis, K. K. (2024) · Disabilities · doi:10.3390/disabilities4020017 · Cited by 20
“…Williams Syndrome [17,26], intellectual disabilities [22,26,27], 22q11 deletion syndrome (which involves developmental delays and may face mild intellectual disability or learning disabilities) [26], and physical disabilities [23,25] including deafness [18], and chronic health problems [25].”
BackgroundInfluentialUsers' Perceptions of Online Child Abuse Detection Mechanisms
Deldari, E., Thakkar, P., & Yao, Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3637424 · Cited by 9
Child Online Safety in Indian Context
Andrews, D., Alathur, S., Chetty, N., & Kumar, V. (2020) · International Conference on Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS) · doi:10.1109/icccs49678.2020.9277038 · Cited by 8
Punjani, N. S., Hussain, A., Yan, W., Hartling, L., Scott, S. D., Elgaweesh, F., & Kennedy, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1765426 · Cited by 4
Technology-Based Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention Programs: A Systematic Review
ALTUNPUL, N., & Koçtürk, N. (2024) · Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar - Current Approaches in Psychiatry · doi:10.18863/pgy.1340938 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, R. D.
- Affiliations
- Internet Society (US)
- Corresponding author
- Singh, Rajnesh D.
- ORCID
- Singh, Rajnesh D.
- Venue
- Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-05-28
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 651-664
- ISSN
- 2050-2680 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2807312909
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Internet Society
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
- Keywords
- child online safety, online sexual abuse, cyberbullying, internet addiction, children's internet use, emerging markets, multi-stakeholder collaboration, children's participation, child well-being, online safety policy, Asia-Pacific region
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping online child safety in Asia and the Pacific. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/app5.247
- The paper
- Singh, R. D. (2018). Mapping online child safety in Asia and the Pacific. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.247
