Cited by 100Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementFish Ecology and Management StudiesEnvironmental Conservation and Management

Achieving Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 to improve the performance of protected areas and conserve freshwater biodiversity

Juffe‐Bignoli, Diego, Harrison, Ian, Butchart, Stuart HM, Flitcroft, Rebecca, Hermoso, Virgilio, Jonas, Harry, Lukasiewicz, Anna, Thieme, Michele +14 more·2016·Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

Abstract

The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity (2011–2020), adopted at the 10th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, sets 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets to be met by 2020 to address biodiversity loss and ensure its sustainable and equitable use. Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 describes what an improved conservation network would look like for marine, terrestrial and inland water areas, including freshwater ecosystems. To date, there is no comprehensive assessment of what needs to be achieved to meet Target 11 for freshwater biodiversity. Reports on implementation often fail to consider explicitly freshwater ecosystem processes and habitats, the pressures upon them, and therefore the full range of requirements and actions needed to sustain them. Here the current progress and key gaps for meeting Aichi Target 11 are assessed by exploring the implications of each of its clauses for freshwater biodiversity. Concerted action on Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 for freshwater biodiversity by 2020 is required in a number of areas: a robust baseline is needed for each of the clauses described here at national and global scales; designation of new protected areas or expansion of existing protected areas to cover known areas of importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, and a representative sample of biodiversity; use of Other Effective Area‐Based Conservation Measures (OECMs) in places where designating a protected area is not appropriate; and promoting and implementing better management strategies for fresh water in protected areas that consider its inherent connectivity, contextual vulnerability, and required human and technical capacity. Considering the specific requirements of freshwater systems through Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 has long‐term value to the Sustainable Development Goals discussions and global conservation policy agenda into the coming decades. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aqc.2638

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protected areas cover approximately 13% of the terrestrial world, with freshwater often included among the figure for terrestrial areas, and approximately 7.7% of the ocean.

    “Protected areas cover ∼13% of the terrestrial world (Jenkins & Joppa, 2009), with freshwater often included among the figure for terrestrial areas (Juffe‐Bignoli et al., 2016), and ∼ 7.7% of the ocean (www.protectedplanet.net); they are a key component of the societal response to environmental degradation (Gaston et al., 2008; Conroy et al., 2011).”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Juffe‐Bignoli et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Juffe‐Bignoli, D., Harrison, I., Butchart, S. H., Flitcroft, R., Hermoso, V., Jonas, H., Lukasiewicz, A., Thieme, M., Turak, E., Bingham, H., Dalton, J., Darwall, W., Deguignet, M., Dudley, N., Gardner, R., Higgins, J., Kumar, R., Linke, S., Milton, G. R., Pittock, J., Smith, K. G., & van Soesbergen, A.
Affiliations
  • UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (GB)
  • Conservation International (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • US Forest Service (US)
  • Forest Science and Technology Centre of Catalonia (ES)
  • Natural Justice: Lawyers for Communities and the Environment Cape Town Western Cape South Africa
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • World Wildlife Fund (US)
  • Australian Museum (AU)
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature (CH)
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Stetson University (US)
  • The Nature Conservancy (US)
  • Wetlands International (NL)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Government of Nova Scotia (CA)
  • United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP‐WCMC) Cambridge UK
Corresponding author
Juffe‐Bignoli, Diego
Venue
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06
Volume
26
Issue
S1
Pages
133-151
ISSN
  • 1052-7613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0755
OpenAlex
W2508573573
Cited by
100
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4
FWCI
7.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • ARC DECRA (DE130100565)
  • Ramon y Cajal (RYC-2013-13979)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Conservation and Management
Keywords
freshwater biodiversity, protected areas, other effective area-based conservation measures, conservation networks, protected area management, biodiversity policy, Sustainable Development Goals, Convention on Biological Diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review