Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluating Mask R‐CNN models to extract terracing across oceanic high islands: A case study from Sāmoa

Quintus, Seth, Davis, Dylan S., Cochrane, Ethan E.·2023·Archaeological Prospection

Abstract

Lidar datasets have been crucial for documenting the scale and nature of human ecosystem engineering and land use. Automated analysis methods, which have been rising in popularity and efficiency, allow for systematic evaluations of vast landscapes. Here, we use a Mask R‐CNN deep learning model to evaluate terracing—artificially flattened areas surrounded by steeper slopes—on islands in American Sāmoa. Mask R‐CNN is notable for its ability to simultaneously perform detection and segmentation tasks related to object recognition, thereby providing robust datasets of both geographic locations of terracing features and their spatial morphometry. Using training datasets from across American Sāmoa, we train this model to recognize terracing features and then apply it to the island of Tutuila to undertake an island‐wide survey for terrace locations, distributions and morphologies. We demonstrate that this model is effective (F1 = 0.718), but limitations are also documented that relate to the quality of the lidar data and the size of terracing features. Our data show that the islands of American Sāmoa display shared patterns of terracing, but the nature of these patterns are distinct on Tutuila compared with the Manu'a island group. These patterns speak to the different interior configurations of the islands. This study demonstrates how deep learning provides a better understanding of landscape construction and behavioural patterning on Tutuila and has the capacity to expand our understanding of these processes on other islands beyond our case study.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/arp.1909

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 93

  1. 10.1080/00934690.2019.1574159 · DOI
  2. Addison D. J.(2006).Feast or famine? Predictability drought density and irrigation: the archaeology of agriculture in Marquesas Islands Valleys. Unpublished PhD Dissertation Department of Anthropology University of Hawai'i.
  3. 10.3390/land10121365 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.jaa.2004.02.001 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/arp.1891 · DOI
  6. 10.1179/1749631414Y.0000000049 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/arco.5137 · DOI
  8. 10.1017/S0003598X00050766 · DOI
  9. 10.3390/rs13204181 · DOI
  10. Best S., 1993, At the halls of the mountain kings. Fijian and Samoan fortifications: Comparison and analysis, Journal of the Polynesian Society, 102, 385
  11. 10.1007/s10745-012-9552-x · DOI
  12. 10.1017/aap.2021.6 · DOI
  13. Bickler S. H., 2021, Scaling up deep learning to identify earthwork sites in Te Tai Tokerau, Northland, New Zealand, Archaeology in New Zealand, 64, 16
  14. 10.1002/arp.1806 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1080/00438243.2021.1891963 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/arp.1883 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jag.2018.08.008 · DOI
  18. Carson M. T., 2006, Samoan cultivation practices in archaeological perspective, People and Culture in Oceania, 22, 1
  19. 10.1080/00934690.2018.1503034 · DOI
  20. 10.1017/aap.2021.17 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.jas.2019.104998 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/arp.1738 · DOI
  23. 10.7183/2326-3768.4.3.357 · DOI
  24. Clark J. T., 1993, Prehistoric settlement system in eastern Tutuila, American Samoa, Journal of the Polynesian Society, 102, 147
  25. Cochrane E. E., 2018, LiDAR imagery confirms extensive interior land‐use on Tutuila, American Samoa, Journal of Pacific Archaeology, 9, 70
  26. 10.5194/gmd-8-1991-2015 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/arp.1730 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.jas.2021.105433 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.10.035 · DOI
  30. 10.3390/rs13183680 · DOI
  31. 10.15286/jps.127.1.55-72 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jas.2022.105557 · DOI
  33. 10.3390/ijgi9120713 · DOI
  34. 10.1117/12.2325119 · DOI
  35. 10.1017/aap.2019.42 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.jas.2016.04.011 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.02.028 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/arco.5212 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/arp.1572 · DOI
  40. Green R. C., 2002, Pacific landscapes: Archaeological approaches, 125
  41. 10.3390/rs10020225 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103027 · DOI
  43. He K. Gkioxari G. Dollár P. &GirshickR.(2017).Mask R‐CNN. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision 2961–2969. · DOI · Paper page
  44. Healy P. F., 1983, Caracol, Belize: Evidence of ancient Maya agricultural terraces, Journal of Field Archaeology, 10, 397, 10.1179/009346983791504200 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/s10816-019-09420-2 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102563 · DOI
  47. 10.3390/rs61110716 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1515/opar-2020-0136 · DOI
  49. Hunt T. L., 1988, An archaeological survey of the Manu'a islands, American Samoa, Journal of the Polynesian Society, 97, 153
  50. 10.15286/jps.127.1.73-90 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.12.018 · DOI
  52. 10.1002/j.1834-4453.1982.tb00032.x · DOI
  53. Kirch P. V., 1994, The wet and the dry: Irrigation and agricultural intensification in the Pacific
  54. 10.1126/sciadv.abf8441 · DOI
  55. 10.1017/S0003598X00049887 · DOI
  56. Kuhlken R., 1999, Agricultural terracing at Nakauvadra, Viti Levu: A late prehistoric irrigated agrosystem in Fiji, Asian Perspectives, 38, 62
  57. 10.1016/j.jas.2011.08.031 · DOI
  58. Lepofsky D. S.(1994).Prehistoric agricultural intensification in the Society Islands French Polynesia. Unpublished PhD dissertation Department of Anthropology University of California at Berkeley.
  59. 10.1002/j.1834-4453.2009.tb00047.x · DOI
  60. 10.7183/2326-3768.4.3.371 · DOI
  61. 10.1002/arp.1565 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.jas.2011.02.033 · DOI
  63. 10.3390/geosciences9030109 · DOI
  64. 10.1007/s42489-020-00049-w · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103610 · DOI
  66. Parton P., 2018, The field of war: LiDAR identification of earthwork defences on Tongatapu Island, Kingdom of Tonga, Journal of Pacific Archaeology, 9, 11
  67. Pearl F., 2004, The chronology of mountain settlements on Tutuila, American Samoa, The Journal of the Polynesian Society, 113, 331
  68. 10.1111/cuag.12062 · DOI
  69. 10.1007/s10745-013-9578-8 · DOI
  70. 10.15286/jps.127.1.15-34 · DOI
  71. Quintus S., 2020, Community relationships and integration at a small‐island scale, Journal of Pacific Archaeology, 11, 61
  72. 10.1016/j.jasrep.2014.11.010 · DOI
  73. 10.1017/aap.2017.13 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1017/RDC.2020.60 · DOI
  75. 10.1080/00934690.2021.2018259 · DOI
  76. Riley S. J., 1999, Index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity, Intermountain Journal of Sciences, 5, 23
  77. 10.1127/zfg_suppl/2016/0328 · DOI
  78. 10.1002/arp.1869 · DOI
  79. 10.1017/S0003598X00092565 · DOI
  80. 10.1080/00438243.1990.9980130 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.07.039 · DOI
  82. 10.1109/WACV.2017.58 · DOI
  83. 10.3390/rs12142215 · DOI
  84. 10.3390/rs12030500 · DOI
  85. 10.1371/journal.pone.0257550 · DOI
  86. 10.1353/asi.2000.0014 · DOI
  87. Treacy J. M., 1994, The archaeology of garden and field, 91
  88. 10.1002/arp.1731 · DOI
  89. 10.1002/arp.1889 · DOI
  90. 10.1002/arp.1833 · DOI
  91. 10.3390/ijgi9050293 · DOI · Paper page
  92. 10.1016/j.culher.2020.10.009 · DOI
  93. Yokoyama R., 2002, Visualizing topography by openness: A new application of image processing to digital elevation models, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 68, 257

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Quintus, S., Davis, D. S., & Cochrane, E. E.
Venue
Archaeological Prospection
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-07-13
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
477-492
ISSN
  • 1075-2196
  • 1099-0763
Cited by
12
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • Marsden Fund
  • National Science Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review