The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evidence for increased bone resorption in patients with progressive knee osteoarthritis: Longitudinal results from the Chingford study
Abstract
Objective: Several studies have suggested that increased subchondral bone turnover is a determinant of progression of osteoarthritis (OA). To test this hypothesis, the level of urinary N‐terminal type I collagen telopeptides (NTx) and C‐terminal type I collagen telopeptides (CTx), which are validated markers of bone resorption, was measured at 3 different time points in a subset of patients from the Chingford study. Methods: The original Chingford study population comprised 1,003 women. From this group, postmenopausal women not receiving any bone‐modifying medication who had a baseline knee radiograph and a repeat radiograph 4 years later, and for whom a baseline lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) measurement was available, were identified and separated into 4 groups as follows: controls (n = 50), progressive OA (n = 71), nonprogressive OA (n = 36), and osteoporosis (n = 59). NTx and CTx were measured in urine samples collected at baseline, year 1, and year 2. Results: Patient age and years since menopause were similar among groups at baseline. As expected, both body mass index (BMI) and BMD were lowest in patients with osteoporosis. Median resorption marker levels over the 3 time points were 31–87% higher in patients with either progressive OA or osteoporosis than in controls and patients with nonprogressive OA (P < 0.01, except for levels of CTx in patients with progressive OA versus nonprogressive OA). Levels of NTx and CTx did not differ significantly between women with progressive OA (defined either by the presence of osteophytes or by joint space narrowing) and those with osteoporosis or between controls and women with nonprogressive OA. Results were essentially unchanged after adjustment for age, BMI, BMD, and past use of hormone replacement therapy, or when NTx and CTx values at each time point were analyzed separately. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that bone resorption is increased in patients with progressive knee OA and is not increased in those with nonprogressive knee OA. The increase in bone resorption seen in patients with progressive knee OA is similar to that observed in patients with osteoporosis. Altered bone turnover may be a diagnostic or therapeutic target in patients with progressive OA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.1093/rheumatology/36.1.16 · DOI
- 10.1136/ard.52.8.557 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1063-4584(05)80003-2 · DOI
- 10.1002/art.1780380112 · doi:10.1002/art.1780380112
- Calvo MS, 1996, Molecular basis and clinical application of biological markers of bone turnover, Endocr Rev, 17, 333
- 10.1053/joca.1999.0288 · DOI
- 10.1093/rheumatology/34.8.792 · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/34.8.792
- 10.1007/s002230010068 · DOI
- Stewart A, 1999, Bone density and bone turnover in patients with osteoarthritis and osteoporosis, J Rheumatol, 26, 622
- 10.1093/rheumatology/38.2.133 · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/38.2.133
- Seibel MJ, 1989, Urinary hydroxy‐pyridinium crosslinks provide indices of cartilage and bone involvement in arthritic diseases, J Rheumatol, 16, 964
- 10.1093/rheumatology/33.1.16 · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/33.1.16
- 10.1093/rheumatology/33.1.11 · DOI
- 10.1136/ard.45.12.969 · DOI
- 10.1093/rheumatology/31.11.759 · DOI
- 10.1053/joca.1997.0090 · DOI
- 10.1093/rheumatology/37.1.46 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/rheumatology/28.5.393 · DOI
- 10.1002/1529-0131(199904)42:3<483::AID-ANR13>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI · Paper page
- Hart DJ, 1993, The relationship of obesity, fat distribution and osteoarthritis in women in the general population: the Chingford Study, J Rheumatol, 20, 331
- Burnett S, 1994, A radiographic atlas of osteoarthritis
- 10.1097/00003086-199609000-00033 · DOI
- Bettica P, 1997, Comparison of the clinical performance of the immunoenzymometric assays for N‐terminal and C‐terminal type I collagen telopeptides and the HPLC assay for pyridinium cross‐links, Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem, 35, 63
- 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.7.1124 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1053/joca.1998.0234 · doi:10.1053/joca.1998.0234
- Hart DJ, Hellgren & Lawrence grade 1 osteophytes in the knee: doubtful or definite?, Osteoarthritis Cartilage
- 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00273-0 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.307.6897.172 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Hayami, T., Pickarski, M., Zhuo, Y., Wesolowski, G. A., Rodan, G. A., & Duong, L. T. (2006) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2005.08.007 · Cited by 624
Biological markers in osteoarthritis
Rousseau, J.-C., & Delmas, P. D. (2007) · Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/ncprheum0508 · Cited by 237
Hunter, D. J., Gerstenfeld, L., Bishop, G., Davis, A. D., Mason, Z. D., Einhorn, T. A., Maciewicz, R. A., Newham, P., Foster, M., Jackson, S., et al. (2009) · Arthritis Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/ar2601 · Cited by 214
Bellido, M., Lugo, L., Roman-Blas, J. A., Castañeda, S., Calvo, E., Largo, R., & Herrero-Beaumont, G. (2011) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2011.07.003 · Cited by 134
Cheng, T., Zhang, L., Fu, X., Wang, W., Xu, H., Song, H., & Zhang, Y. (2013) · Connective Tissue Research · doi:10.3109/03008207.2012.760549 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Bettica, P., Cline, G., Hart, D. J., Meyer, J., & Spector, T. D.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3178-3184
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W2005692528
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for increased bone resorption in patients with progressive knee osteoarthritis: Longitudinal results from the Chingford study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.10630
- The paper
- Bettica, P., Cline, G., Hart, D. J., Meyer, J., & Spector, T. D. (2002). Evidence for increased bone resorption in patients with progressive knee osteoarthritis: Longitudinal results from the Chingford study. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10630
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.